I don't have to prove anything to you, the courts are already doing that.
I followed a number of these proceedings until it was apparent trump was just putting on a show to milk the rubes. I "feel like an expert" because I made cases for a decade and understand the process, where you clearly don't. You're making declarations from ignorance and I'm clearing things up for you.
Anyone saying 8,000 pages means the issue couldn't have possibly have been processed quickly and properly is a fool or a liar, and I've explained why.
I don't need to spend any time looking into the specifics to say that definitively, it's a fact, irregardless of the case.
A number of cases have been dismissed with prejudice. That's a pretty severe rebuke, and it's a court's way of saying "stop wasting our time with nonsense cases".
And now your position is that they're being rejected by liberal judges, completely ignoring the fact several have been rejected by Trump appointees, including at the highest level.
You're actually making some pretty serious accusations here.
Please name the judge you're accusing of treason, the case you're referring to, the cause that was presented and rejected, what vital evidence was ignored, and how pertinent it was to proving the case.