Elections Election Fraud update V.2 - more evidence?

Oh look, the "I know what you are but what am I" tactic.

Fitting for the bunch of children you are.

Oh, look at the "I know what you are but what am I" tactic. Thanks, Child.

You are the only one lying in these threads. I am sorry the terminology hurts your precious ego.
 
please cite your sources.
it was in the Texas case which got dismissed by scotus on standing. the case was then filed individually in the concerned states. executive branch violated election law when they bypassed state legislatures. it’s all in the case which you can view online. the concerned articles and amendments are cited
 
It's so funny.

I post one answer around here these days, and 2-5 radical leftists quote me immediately. It's like they're being paid. What kind of vermin spends all day trying to obstruct truth like this?

Look at this loaded question bullshit. I already made the point. No possible way all the evidence was presented in a hasty brief court hearing.

Laughable.

the law understander
 
it was in the Texas case which got dismissed by scotus on standing. the case was then filed individually in the concerned states. executive branch violated election law when they bypassed state legislatures. it’s all in the case which you can view online. the concerned articles and amendments are cited

Wow, you don't say, it was dismissed by the SCOTUS yet here you are still arguing it. I guess maybe the claim didn't lack merit. I also remember the PA SCOPA ruled against this as well. It's dead, man.

What's your next little tidbit. Maybe see what lying Sidney Powel is doing? I'm sure she's got a veterinarian to explain to you how electors work.
 
It's so funny.

I post one answer around here these days, and 2-5 radical leftists quote me immediately. It's like they're being paid. What kind of vermin spends all day trying to obstruct truth like this?

Look at this loaded question bullshit. I already made the point. No possible way all the evidence was presented in a hasty brief court hearing.

Laughable.

So, they can come back with evidence later. What they submitted so far, according to the judge, is nothing. If, and when, they come back with better evidence then the courts and I will consider it. Until then, it's just wackjobs blaming Hugo Chavez on national tv to me.
 
So, they can come back with evidence later. What they submitted so far, according to the judge, is nothing. If, and when, they come back with better evidence then the courts and I will consider it. Until then, it's just wackjobs blaming Hugo Chavez on national tv to me.

You are clearly too stupid to understand how this stuff works.

Anyway, I just made another comment and BOOM! Another 4 quotes from the resident leftists.

How much are they paying you?

Honest question.
 
Imagine the precedent if Mitchie Boy's crew voted to approve this crap, knowing it won't pass the house. Might as well get rid of the presidential election and let congress pick one every 4 years (not a terrible idea, btw).

Ya that would be horrendous lol but the thing is the GOP wouldn't care, they'd actually applaud McConnell and everyone that voted with Trump. We're getting close to hyper partisanship where all sensible discourse is thrown out the window.
 
Ya that would be horrendous lol but the thing is the GOP wouldn't care, they'd actually applaud McConnell and everyone that voted with Trump. We're getting close to hyper partisanship where all sensible discourse is thrown out the window.
you mean McConnell the one married to CCP spy? he’s like a less handsome version of the other sellout, Eric Swalwell.

chao262way_wide-302fde22072910f2c4bf8c629c52ad2279673450.jpg
 
It's so funny.

I post one answer around here these days, and 2-5 radical leftists quote me immediately. It's like they're being paid. What kind of vermin spends all day trying to obstruct truth like this?

Look at this loaded question bullshit. I already made the point. No possible way all the evidence was presented in a hasty brief court hearing.

Laughable.

Correct, they presented about 8000 pages of evidence, and it was dismissed within a couple hours lol.

Again, the NV democratic senator in the hearing on Wednesday did not refute anything the lawyer said. If she wanted to prove the democratic POV, you would think she would have come prepared to at least debunk some of it.
 
you mean McConnell the one married to CCP spy? he’s like a less handsome version of the other sellout, Eric Swalwell.

chao262way_wide-302fde22072910f2c4bf8c629c52ad2279673450.jpg

LOL!

So do you understand now how electors work and how Pence can only read the certified ones from the state legislatures?
 
Ya that would be horrendous lol but the thing is the GOP wouldn't care, they'd actually applaud McConnell and everyone that voted with Trump. We're getting close to hyper partisanship where all sensible discourse is thrown out the window.
Agreed.
 
You are clearly too stupid to understand how this stuff works.

Anyway, I just made another comment and BOOM! Another 4 quotes from the resident leftists.

How much are they paying you?

Honest question.
Soros sent out a memo that he won't be paying his people to dunk on the trolls itt anymore. It's just too easy.
 

Historically, most Taiwanese people originated from China (under regimes before the PRC). Taiwanese people (of Chinese descent) have traveled between China and Taiwan throughout history. Taiwanese Aborigines also have a minor presence in China (PRC).
 
Back
Top