Elections Election Fraud update - evidence coming in so fast we can't keep up

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plus juan.

Should have posted an important stat:

"The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commissionguidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity"

Posted this in another thread. Here is an article with the full, actual report as well.

https://saraacarter.com/antrim-fore...purposefully-designed-to-influence-elections/

edit: they also determined this was not human error and/or random glitch, as previously reported.
 
Plus juan.

Should have posted an important stat:

"The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commissionguidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity"

Posted this in another thread. Here is an article with the full, actual report as well.

https://saraacarter.com/antrim-fore...purposefully-designed-to-influence-elections/

edit: they also determined this was not human error and/or random glitch, as previously reported.
THIS IS IT!
 
But he made a thread saying he was just trolling all along, and definitely NOT getting his hopes raised and shattered over and over and over and over and over again every single day for over a month! So who is the idiot now?

<{Heymansnicker}>

oh, so now "he was just trolling"

sure sure. clearly its not because he cant walk back all the stupid predictions and really bad takes on reality he said after he bought into the grift and all of those nothing burgers, he knows his cult messiah is done, theres nothing else to pivot to or anything else to try to save face, but somehow he just needs to feel like he' still the winner here, despite going so hard on championing a loser and watching diaper don get his shit pushed in endlessly
 
Last edited:


lmfao. now he wants to get the hands from New Mexico.

i wonder if New California and New Nevada will be on board with this lawsuit?
 
what happened to that fake news thread about nevada and michigan casting their votes for trump?

that got debunked rather quick.
 
I know, right?

At this point, screw it.

The Dems have completed the steal MASTERFULLY and one can only sit back and marvel at how sophisticated and widespread that the level of corruption truly is.

So...moving on, I wonder how long Biden lasts? One month? 6 months before he's "convinced" to step down and let Kamala take over? <Manning1>


"Elections have consequences."

- Sen. Mitch McConnell
 
Plus juan.

Should have posted an important stat:

"The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commissionguidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity"

Posted this in another thread. Here is an article with the full, actual report as well.

https://saraacarter.com/antrim-fore...purposefully-designed-to-influence-elections/

edit: they also determined this was not human error and/or random glitch, as previously reported.
tenor.gif
 
Plus juan.

Should have posted an important stat:

"The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commissionguidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity"

Posted this in another thread. Here is an article with the full, actual report as well.

https://saraacarter.com/antrim-fore...purposefully-designed-to-influence-elections/

edit: they also determined this was not human error and/or random glitch, as previously reported.

@Holic by the way, one thing I forgot to mention is that the 68.05% with the error, those then go to the adjudication process. That brings up the whole adjudication the algorithm they have continued to mentioned in these various hearings, where Biden gets 1.3 votes, and Trump gets .7. That is what is accounting for these shift of votes, NOT human error.

So basically, 68% of votes were sent to adjudication for various reasons, and for every Biden vote, he gets 1.3 votes, and Trump gets .7 vote.

But with 68% of votes having errors and sent to adjudication, how can that be reliable, especially with a weighted algorithm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top