Elections Election Fraud update - evidence coming in so fast we can't keep up

Status
Not open for further replies.
tenor.gif

are you disputing that this report is not real? I mean, this isn't an opinion of mine, it is an actual report from an audit that was approved by a judge to be released, just this morning.

Here is a different link, as the last link was taken down.

https://www.9and10news.com/content/...higan_Forensics_Report_121320_v2_REDACTED.pdf
 
are you disputing that this report is not real? I mean, this isn't an opinion of mine, it is an actual report from an audit that was approved by a judge to be released, just this morning.

Here is a different link, as the last link was taken down.

https://www.9and10news.com/content/...higan_Forensics_Report_121320_v2_REDACTED.pdf

Wait a second. How can they say a large number of errors = voter fraud? It might set up.a situation where it might happen but that's not what they are implying. This sounds suspect for an independent audit.
 
Wait a second. How can they say a large number of errors = voter fraud? It might set up.a situation where it might happen but that's not what they are implying. This sounds suspect for an independent audit.

They arent implying anything. It is literally what happened, based on the logs of the machines


Date Registered Voters Total Votes Cast Biden Trump Third Party Write-In TOTAL VOTES for President
Nov 3 22,082 16,047 7,769 4,509 145 14 12,423
Nov 5 22,082 18,059 7,289 9,783 255 20 17,327
Nov 21 22,082 16,044 5,960 9,748 241 23 15,949

The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors.
 
Last edited:
They arent implying anything. It is literally what happened, based on the logs of the machines


Date Registered Voters Total Votes Cast Biden Trump Third Party Write-In TOTAL VOTES for President
Nov 3 22,082 16,047 7,769 4,509 145 14 12,423
Nov 5 22,082 18,059 7,289 9,783 255 20 17,327
Nov 21 22,082 16,044 5,960 9,748 241 23 15,949

The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors.

That doesn't imply fraud. Did you read why they implies fraud? Go look and have a read .
 
They arent implying anything. It is literally what happened, based on the logs of the machines


Date Registered Voters Total Votes Cast Biden Trump Third Party Write-In TOTAL VOTES for President
Nov 3 22,082 16,047 7,769 4,509 145 14 12,423
Nov 5 22,082 18,059 7,289 9,783 255 20 17,327
Nov 21 22,082 16,044 5,960 9,748 241 23 15,949

The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors.
Couple of things (I read their report earlier, made a post about it actually:
- # of events =/= # of votes; an event is any step in the process that one ballot goes through (ballot scanned, ballot stored, ballot analysed, data presented to screen, written to disc; n.b.: these are random examples, the report does not specify);
- errors are always present in an error log, the amount, or rather, severity of the error logged varies on the settings one inputs for the recording of the error log, so an error could be any minor thing in the process, which does not affect the process itself, and is not presented to the user; the report states that the vast majority of these errors are actually errors related to the hardware used, the most common ones; they specify only a few, but the most serious one was "not enough memory available to process", which means the system had to use more memory than was originally allocated to the software, and it just grabbed some from elsewhere; does not affect the process;
- the only thing the report states it found, was that there were possibilities to misuse the software, i.e., commit fraud, but nowhere does it state they found that actually happened; they, for instance, state that the config of the software was so broad, that an administrator could have flipped votes, however, they found no evidence of that happening in the logs;
- the 0.7/ 1.3 nonsense was debunked the second it came out, and is found nowhere in the released report.

How's that for leg work @glenwo2? Of to bed now, leg day tomorrow, coincidentally.
 
That doesn't imply fraud. Did you read why they implies fraud? Go look and have a read .
But this is and has been the whole issue all along; they call "us" sheep, but we actually read the bloody reports when they come out, be it the Mueller report, or the one on Altrim County that came out today, or the lawsuits that were filed, the affadavits (I mean, not every single one, I don't have the best "suspension of disbelief"). They only read the bits someone tweeted, completely out of context, and then gloat "This is it!".
 
Couple of things (I read their report earlier, made a post about it actually:
- # of events =/= # of votes; an event is any step in the process that one ballot goes through (ballot scanned, ballot stored, ballot analysed, data presented to screen, written to disc; n.b.: these are random examples, the report does not specify);
- errors are always present in an error log, the amount, or rather, severity of the error logged varies on the settings one inputs for the recording of the error log, so an error could be any minor thing in the process, which does not affect the process itself, and is not presented to the user; the report states that the vast majority of these errors are actually errors related to the hardware used, the most common ones; they specify only a few, but the most serious one was "not enough memory available to process", which means the system had to use more memory than was originally allocated to the software, and it just grabbed some from elsewhere; does not affect the process;
- the only thing the report states it found, was that there were possibilities to misuse the software, i.e., commit fraud, but nowhere does it state they found that actually happened; they, for instance, state that the config of the software was so broad, that an administrator could have flipped votes, however, they found no evidence of that happening in the logs;
- the 0.7/ 1.3 nonsense was debunked the second it came out, and is found nowhere in the released report.

How's that for leg work @glenwo2? Of to bed now, leg day tomorrow, coincidentally.

As for the 1.3 to .7, I said "That brings up the whole adjudication the algorithm they have continued to mentioned in these various hearings, where Biden gets 1.3 votes, and Trump gets .7. That is what is accounting for these shift of votes, NOT human error." I did not say that was in the report.

In terms of actual errors, you can nit pick minor details, but you should at least reference the actual switch of votes, which is the most important part
 
As for the 1.3 to .7, I said "That brings up the whole adjudication the algorithm they have continued to mentioned in these various hearings, where Biden gets 1.3 votes, and Trump gets .7. That is what is accounting for these shift of votes, NOT human error." I did not say that was in the report.

In terms of actual errors, you can nit pick minor details, but you should at least reference the actual switch of votes, which is the most important part
I stand corrected.

It's simple math; that was the margin of error, mathimatically.

And it's not nitpicking, never does the report state that an error from the error log caused a problem with the tabulation.

Again: why didn't the Trump campaign ask for a hand recount in this county?
 
Last edited:
I stand corrected, guess I just ignored that one, because it just states that it has been mentioned in hearings, but provide nothing to back it up. They audited the thing, so finding THAT would have to have been priority number 1, and there was nothing. It's simple math; that was the margin of error, mathimatically.

They literally found the 6000 vote switch, which started this audit. That isn't disputed. I don't trust a machine that has such a high error right and can switch 6000 votes. Especially when the governor and secretary of state (democrats) try to stop this report from being released.
 
They literally found the 6000 vote switch, which started this audit. That isn't disputed. I don't trust a machine that has such a high error right and can switch 6000 votes. Especially when the governor and secretary of state (democrats) try to stop this report from being released.
I edited my reply, read over the part where you said you didn't say it was in the report, so I jumped to rechecking the report.
The vote switch has been explained as human error, as it was. None of that is disputed in the report. It gives explanations of what could have happened. Read J.3, page 18. It never says it did happen, it says it could have happened. They say RCV was enabled, but never show that configuration. "Allow an operator to", "thus allowing any operator". Never says it happened, but it could have.
 
I edited my reply, read over the part where you said you didn't say it was in the report, so I jumped to rechecking the report.
The vote switch has been explained as human error, as it was. None of that is disputed in the report. It gives explanations of what could have happened. Read J.3, page 18. It never says it did happen, it says it could have happened. They say RCV was enabled, but never show that configuration. "Allow an operator to", "thus allowing any operator". Never says it happened, but it could have.

But what you fail to mention is the office originally reported a glitch, then changed their report to human error. Without making these people testify again, with new evidence, it is their word vs facts. This court case literally was ruled this morning, this now leads to further subpoenas and investigations, these things take time.

I think it is suspect when the clerks have to change their OFFICIAL statements, and then the democratic secretary of state has to try and intervene, and hide evidence. You guys joke about, "omg this is now third world cause of Trump" ... but places like Detroit are pretty much 3rd world, so no surprise this shit happens. Democrats hiding their crimes in plain sight.

Here is Benson trying to hide all this

https://www.freep.com/story/news/po...n-antrim-case-trump-allege-errors/3885816001/

This is all coming to a head.

As I mentioned earlier, there are still 250+ investigations in GA alone (as is this case in MI with the dominion machines). Here is one now leading to further investigations directly related to Stacey Abrams and the democrats leading up to this upcoming election. These are actual investigations, not my opinions. They are occurring because of investigations from the presidential election.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/vo...under-investigation-seeking-out-of-state-dead

These cases continue to build. As evident last week with Texas, we can see multiple states join in and create a SOCTUS case at a moments notice. Let it simmer and come to a boil right meow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top