Elections Election Fraud update - evidence coming in so fast we can't keep up

[BFoe]

yet you keep coming back for more. Intardasting

We could’ve ended this thread a week after the election but you guys insist on living in an alternate reality, with your own alternate facts and “alternate electors.” I’m very much looking forward to this thread being shut down.
It was legendary though.

 

[HOLA]

Epic thread. We'll hit 10,000 posts soon. So many delusions shattered. Some are still going...

 

[rj144]

those were also 2 NON-Trump appointed judges. So now they also have evidence that the ones he did appoint are not biased and are just. Just like the justice department. But what if more evidence accumulates, these judges could easily swing and make it 5-4, rather than 2-7. It isnt like Kava and ACB don't hate the democrats and their shit.

So this is it?

Again, there is no real evidence. If there was any shred of credible evidence Trump would not be 1-59 or whatever. Just use common sense and let it die.

 

[Damien Karras]

those were also 2 NON-Trump appointed judges. So now they also have evidence that the ones he did appoint are not biased and are just. Just like the justice department. But what if more evidence accumulates, these judges could easily swing and make it 5-4, rather than 2-7. It isnt like Kava and ACB don't hate the democrats and their shit.

I recommend you take a hard look in the mirror and come to terms with the fact that it's not happening. Stop consuming BS media that has been lying to you from the beginning. They haven't been right once. I'm serious. It's for the sake of your sanity. You have to move on from this.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

2 of the judges said TX had a right to file but they (the 2 SCOTUS judges) would not have granted relief. The case was meritless. On multiple fronts.

of course they did, because relief would mean they would have stopped things right then and there, at that point, without an actual hearing. But they wanted to hear it, and let it play out. Easy to have 3 republican, Trump appointees swing to want to hear it and let it play out in public.

So this is it?

Again, there is no real evidence. If there was any shred of credible evidence Trump would not be 1-59 or whatever. Just use common sense and let it die.

They have ongoing investigations, as apart of the 250+ in GA, including obvious illegal activity on camera, despite what sec of state rep says. Has that case been thrown out? NO. It is ongoing, as evident by the GA legislative hearing on Friday, where they rereviewed the information.

They have 6000 vote flip, now with forensic audits supporting their claims.

There is multiple other stuff ongoing.

 

[HOLA]

A Sherdog War Room Maxim:

The longer the thread is, the more full of shit the content is.

 

[rj144]

of course they did, because relief would mean they would have stopped things right then and there, at that point, without an actual hearing. But they wanted to hear it, and let it play out. Easy to have 3 republican, Trump appointees swing to want to hear it and let it play out in public.



They have ongoing investigations, as apart of the 250+ in GA, including obvious illegal activity on camera, despite what sec of state rep says. Has that case been thrown out? NO. It is ongoing, as evident by the GA legislative hearing on Friday, where they rereviewed the information.

They have 6000 vote flip, now with forensic audits supporting their claims.

There is multiple other stuff ongoing.

Again, if ANYTHING was credible, there wouldn't be BS case after case for 6 weeks.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

Again, if ANYTHING was credible, there wouldn't be BS case after case for 6 weeks.

The Michigan case was literally ruled on this morning, to release the evidence. It has only been audited last week

 

[Damien Karras]

So this is it?

Again, there is no real evidence. If there was any shred of credible evidence Trump would not be 1-59 or whatever. Just use common sense and let it die.

It's not just that they're 1-59. They've been ridiculed by some judges. Some cases have been dropped with prejudice. I mean... it's not just the number of losses but how they're losing, and it's pathetic.

It would be like what Cody McKenzie would look like in a title fight against GSP.

 

[Damien Karras]

The Michigan case was literally ruled on this morning, to release the evidence. It has only been audited last week

holy crap this is sad

 

[Day Drinking]

those were also 2 NON-Trump appointed judges. So now they also have evidence that the ones he did appoint are not biased and are just. Just like the justice department. But what if more evidence accumulates, these judges could easily swing and make it 5-4, rather than 2-7. It isnt like Kava and ACB don't hate the democrats and their shit.

Do you know what the constitution says about overturning the electoral college?

 

[Damien Karras]

Do you know what the constitution says about overturning the electoral college?

he probably thinks it's "when in doubt, litigate"

 

[rj144]

It's not just that they're 1-59. They've been ridiculed by some judges. Some cases have been dropped with prejudice. I mean... it's not just the number of losses but how they're losing, and it's pathetic.

It would be like what Cody McKenzie would look like in a title fight against GSP.

I know. Imagine a fighter starting his pro career 1-59. Would anyone be saying, "Wait until his NEXT fight, that's when he's going to start putting things together."?

 

[cottagecheesefan]

Do you know what the constitution says about overturning the electoral college?

I assume it would go to the house of representatives

 

[Day Drinking]

I assume it would go to the house of representatives

No. It very simply has no way to do it constitutionally.

https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-2/03-electoral-college.html

 

[cottagecheesefan]

No. It very simply has no way to do it constitutionally.

https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-2/03-electoral-college.html

wasn't this already commented on?

They even have RBG saying "Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is January 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College,” the release said. “The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the president on January 20 at noon.”

plus

Just because the EC voted, congress did not count it today

The Constitution gives Congress the final say in the election.
When the Electoral College meets on Monday, each state will formally cast its electoral votes for president. Mr. Biden is expected to receive 306 to Mr. Trump’s 232, making him the winner.

Article II, Section 1 says, “The president of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted.”

To that end, on Jan. 6, envelopes containing certificates showing the electoral results from all 50 states will be carried into the House chamber inside two bound mahogany boxes that date from the 19th century. Representatives of the newly sworn-in House and Senate, called “tellers” for the occasion, will pull them out one by one to determine whether each “seems to be regular in form and authentic” and present them to the president of the Senate — in this case, Mr. Pence — for inspection and approval.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/14/us/politics/congress-election-role.html

 

[smooth assassin]

I know. Imagine a fighter starting his pro career 1-59. Would anyone be saying, "Wait until his NEXT fight, that's when he's going to start putting things together."?

Imagine coming up with an actual applicable comparison, instead you just show your bias

 

[rj144]

wasn't this already commented on?

They even have RBG saying "Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is January 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College,” the release said. “The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the president on January 20 at noon.”

Just because the EC voted, congress did not count it today

The Constitution gives Congress the final say in the election.
When the Electoral College meets on Monday, each state will formally cast its electoral votes for president. Mr. Biden is expected to receive 306 to Mr. Trump’s 232, making him the winner.

Article II, Section 1 says, “The president of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted.”

To that end, on Jan. 6, envelopes containing certificates showing the electoral results from all 50 states will be carried into the House chamber inside two bound mahogany boxes that date from the 19th century. Representatives of the newly sworn-in House and Senate, called “tellers” for the occasion, will pull them out one by one to determine whether each “seems to be regular in form and authentic” and present them to the president of the Senate — in this case, Mr. Pence — for inspection and approval.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/14/us/politics/congress-election-role.html

And ballpark the chances that Congress overturns the EC?

 

[rj144]

Imagine coming up with an actual applicable comparison, instead you just show your bias

I'm showing bias?

 

[hillelslovak87]

I know. Imagine a fighter starting his pro career 1-59. Would anyone be saying, "Wait until his NEXT fight, that's when he's going to start putting things together."?

The GOP has reached the level of Charlie-Z.

"Just you guys wait, you're gonna be coping real soon!"