International E Jean Carroll Bests Donald J Trump to the Tune of $83 million

  • Thread starter Deleted member 585708
  • Start date
Are there still appeals left in this case or is it a done deal?
 
That's two witnesses. That's literally all it took for Carroll.

I wonder if someone like @PainIsLIfe would argue that if one person accuses Barack Obama of rape sometime in 1994 and has two friends say she told them it happened, Obama would actually see the inside of a courtroom.

I'm not calling him out, im specificslly using him because he isn't an insane zealot. He's still rational and presents the logic of his position. But wtf? Nobody thinks Obama or any other ex president would see a courtroom for this much evidence.
 


donald-trump-mad-about-trial-sketch.jpg


I guess you just can’t flatly call Trump a rapist because it’s bullshit. You need to add the “adjudicated” or “found liable in civil court” before. Doesn’t quite have the the same punch huh? Which is why Slopadopolous just called him a rapist and now has to grovel at Trump’s kneecaps like the dog he is.

Now they bend the knee.


Also, that hag will never see a dime.
 


donald-trump-mad-about-trial-sketch.jpg


I guess you just can’t flatly call Trump a rapist because it’s bullshit. You need to add the “adjudicated” or “found liable in civil court” before. Doesn’t quite have the the same punch huh? Which is why Slopadopolous just called him a rapist and now has to grovel at Trump’s kneecaps like the dog he is.

Now they bend the knee.


Also, that hag will never see a dime.


Sherdog mods and retard “lawyers” absolutely SHOOK
 


donald-trump-mad-about-trial-sketch.jpg


I guess you just can’t flatly call Trump a rapist because it’s bullshit. You need to add the “adjudicated” or “found liable in civil court” before. Doesn’t quite have the the same punch huh?


the fraudy orange adjudicated rapist has a nice ring to it. but hey, at least he's not a fraudy orange adjudicated bad golfer!
 
Last edited:
I'm with you until you went with the "judge wouldn't let him have a defense".

The judge allowed hearsay as "evidence."

Her evidence was that she told her friends about the alleged encounter. Those friends testified that she told them the alleged sexual assault story.

Hearsay is normally never admissible in any court of law. It's basically useless.
 
Back
Top