- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 85,206
- Reaction score
- 19,042
Critics Review of SIN CITY: A DAME TO KILL FOR
Rotten Tomatoes: 43% Approval Rating (50 out of 116 critics like it)
Consensus: A Dame to Kill For boasts the same stylish violence and striking visual palette as the original Sin City, but lacks its predecessor's brutal impact.
New York Daily News - 2/5
Some pop fiction exists in its own world. But once you find that particular planet dull, sitting till the end feels like being trapped in a funhouse. Which brings us to “Sin City: A Dame to Kill For.” The sequel to one of the most visually striking movies of the last 10 years continues the graphic novel-inspired landscape of its predecessor. But the characters don’t click, and the action feels dull. Willis’ dead cop appears in a few dream sequences, which only reminds us what we’re missing. Without a similarly defined hero in the sequel, this “Dame” has nothing to kill for.
Comingsoon.net - 7/10
A relatively worthy follow-up to what was a breakthrough movie for its time loses some luster from the time passed while still delivering the originality of Miller's visuals and Rodriguez's flair for action. For the second time this year, it's Eva Green's presence that saves another sequel to a Frank Miller adaptation after "300: Rise of an Empire" earlier this year, maybe because Ava is a character with a lot of different sides and Green's daring enough to expose more of herself than we've seen before. Even so, one would never think they could tire of Eva Green's naked breasts, yet even they wear out their welcome.
Rolling Stone - 2/4
The followup to 2005's eye-popping Sin City is neither the dazzler I hoped for nor the disaster I feared. Fighters and femme fatales are the staples of Frank Miller's just-famed graphic novels. And Robert Rodriquez was wise to ask Miller to join him again to direct. The movie looks good enough to inspire a million screensavers. It's just that Sin City: A Dame To Kill For doesn't explode onscreen the way the first one did. Miller's monochrome palette, splashed with color that shines like a whore's lip gloss, doesn't startle as it once did. It's like running into an ex-love and realizing that, damn, the thrill is gone.
James Berardinelli - 3/4
For those who appreciated Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller's 2005 campy, kinetic film noir homage, Sin City, the 2014 follow-up, Sin City: A Dame to Kill For is unlikely to disappoint. It's more of the same and, although a good deal of the freshness associated with the original has evaporated and the stories aren't quite as well packaged, the second installment remains enjoyable, fast-paced, and visually inventive. Sin City: A Dame to Kill For isn't likely to win many new converts but it won't drive away those with a penchant for this kind of supremely violent, hyper-stylized content.
Rotten Tomatoes: 43% Approval Rating (50 out of 116 critics like it)
Consensus: A Dame to Kill For boasts the same stylish violence and striking visual palette as the original Sin City, but lacks its predecessor's brutal impact.
![Sin-City-Dame-Kill-For-Poster-082314-Dragonlord.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi1281.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa512%2FDLX76%2FSC2%2FSin-City-Dame-Kill-For-Poster-082314-Dragonlord.jpg&hash=10cb6579bda4d9bdade74783c5865472)
New York Daily News - 2/5
Some pop fiction exists in its own world. But once you find that particular planet dull, sitting till the end feels like being trapped in a funhouse. Which brings us to “Sin City: A Dame to Kill For.” The sequel to one of the most visually striking movies of the last 10 years continues the graphic novel-inspired landscape of its predecessor. But the characters don’t click, and the action feels dull. Willis’ dead cop appears in a few dream sequences, which only reminds us what we’re missing. Without a similarly defined hero in the sequel, this “Dame” has nothing to kill for.
Comingsoon.net - 7/10
A relatively worthy follow-up to what was a breakthrough movie for its time loses some luster from the time passed while still delivering the originality of Miller's visuals and Rodriguez's flair for action. For the second time this year, it's Eva Green's presence that saves another sequel to a Frank Miller adaptation after "300: Rise of an Empire" earlier this year, maybe because Ava is a character with a lot of different sides and Green's daring enough to expose more of herself than we've seen before. Even so, one would never think they could tire of Eva Green's naked breasts, yet even they wear out their welcome.
Rolling Stone - 2/4
The followup to 2005's eye-popping Sin City is neither the dazzler I hoped for nor the disaster I feared. Fighters and femme fatales are the staples of Frank Miller's just-famed graphic novels. And Robert Rodriquez was wise to ask Miller to join him again to direct. The movie looks good enough to inspire a million screensavers. It's just that Sin City: A Dame To Kill For doesn't explode onscreen the way the first one did. Miller's monochrome palette, splashed with color that shines like a whore's lip gloss, doesn't startle as it once did. It's like running into an ex-love and realizing that, damn, the thrill is gone.
James Berardinelli - 3/4
For those who appreciated Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller's 2005 campy, kinetic film noir homage, Sin City, the 2014 follow-up, Sin City: A Dame to Kill For is unlikely to disappoint. It's more of the same and, although a good deal of the freshness associated with the original has evaporated and the stories aren't quite as well packaged, the second installment remains enjoyable, fast-paced, and visually inventive. Sin City: A Dame to Kill For isn't likely to win many new converts but it won't drive away those with a penchant for this kind of supremely violent, hyper-stylized content.