Donald Trump Jr.'s Russia email scandal shakes the presidency, v5: NOTHING ILLEGAL

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even people with low intelligence treat serial liars appropriately - they don't trust a word out of their mouths. Yet with Trump, his loyal followers can't seem to have a normal response to his lies. The fucking guy has melted your brains!

If that is true, then why did you come in to defend fake media outlets??

{<huh}

Really gets the noggin joggin
 
If that is true, then why did you come in to defend fake media outlets??

{<huh}

Really gets the noggin joggin
I've cleared this up for you but I'll give it one more try.

I came in here to say that Trump's word is meaningless. That's it. So if he claims "fake news" I don't give a fuck, I'd fact check it because he is a compulsive liar.

It's pretty straight forward man.
 
I've cleared this up for you but I'll give it one more try.

I came in here to say that Trump's word is meaningless. That's it. So if he claims "fake news" I don't give a fuck, I'd fact check it because he is a compulsive liar.

It's pretty straight forward man.

If trumps word is meaningless then why did you just make a thread about a trump quote on Obamacare???

<{vega}>

>I'd fact check it

But you didn't, you just assumed the news wasn't lying and started defending them

Really makes you think
 
If trumps word is meaningless then why did you just make a thread about a trump quote on Obamacare???

<{vega}>

Really makes you think
Did you read the thread? Or the OP? It's pretty obvious to functioning adults but of course if you have to actually think a little it may be out of your league.

I mean, you're in here defending a serial liar. It's just silly.
 
Did you read the thread? Or the OP? It's pretty obvious to functioning adults but of course if you have to actually think a little it may be out of your league.

I mean, you're in here defending a serial liar. It's just silly.

You're the serial liar, you said

"So if he claims "fake news" I don't give a fuck, I'd fact check it because he is a compulsive liar."

Except that situation literally just happened and you didn't fact check it, or even read it, you just started defending a fake news story

You're also embarrassing yourself with the "you're wrong and it should be obvious why" routine that people do when they don't have an argument
 
What are you even rambling about?

He seems rustled by the mere idea of free individuals voluntarily organizing.

I guess he much prefers the coercive forms of leftist groupthink which coincide with his narrative.
 
You're the serial liar, you said

"So if he claims "fake news" I don't give a fuck, I'd fact check it because he is a compulsive liar."

Except that situation literally just happened and you didn't fact check it, or even read it, you just started defending a fake news story

You're also embarrassing yourself with the "you're wrong and it should be obvious why" routine that people do when they don't have an argument

b7pOX75_d.jpg
 
The irony of this post coming from a leftist. Lol

Btw - Sounds like fake news without a source.

I haven't seen any liberals do that. Respect for authority and conformity to social norms are defining features of the right, and it's pretty clear here.

He seems rustled by the mere idea of free individuals voluntarily organizing.

I guess he much prefers the coercive forms of leftist groupthink which coincide with his narrative.

Assuming you're referring to me. Not a fan of groupthink from anywhere, as you can see if you read my posts.
 
I haven't seen any liberals do that. Respect for authority and conformity to social norms are defining features of the right, and it's pretty clear here.

This level of dishonesty is why no one here respects you. Its why we walk all over you Jack.
 
This level of dishonesty is why no one here respects you. Its why we walk all over you Jack.

:) You know that it's very obvious that you all (right-wing hiveminders) have the highest respect for me. That's precisely why you get so upset when I don't agree with you. And you should look up "dishonesty." It doesn't mean "disagreeing with GOP talking points."
 
What propaganda? The DNC's real emails?

Whoa, shame on Russia for exposing the deceitful cunts. That defense didn't work during the election, and it doesn't work now. People don't care who hacked the DNC and informed the people of their treachery. Could've been Osama Bin Laden's cousin, for all people care. People cared about the info, not the messenger.
Maybe that's all you and yours cared about but you don't speak for everyone. And there actually was fake news before Trump usurped the term. Things like pizzagate and the Pope endorsing Trump.
 
Last edited:
Even people with low intelligence treat serial liars appropriately - they don't trust a word out of their mouths.
Congratulations, you just described the so called news media outlets you slavishly follow.
Any day now, right?
Irony, have some, its good for the blood.
 
What part of 'sercet meeting' was true? Don't worry, ill wait...

Uh, because nobody except Putin, Trump, and Putin's pet translator were a part of it. Not a US translator, not Tillerson, not McMaster, not anyone.

Add to that Trump didn't mention it, the White House didn't mention it, even to try to spin it as "look at how wonderful of a job Trump is doing improving our relationship with Russia," which would have been the smart play to try to show Trump's ability on the international stage, and to get ahead of any potential attempt to frame it as further Trump and Russia conspiracy.

Instead, it was reported by our allies as a "WTF, why is Trump buddy buddy with Putin, spending an hour with that corrupt thug alone instead of working to shore up the US's relationship with us."
 
:) You know that it's very obvious that you all (right-wing hiveminders) have the highest respect for me. That's precisely why you get so upset when I don't agree with you. And you should look up "dishonesty." It doesn't mean "disagreeing with GOP talking points."

Oh I get it now. You're mad that you weren't featured in our sigs? You need more attention snowflake? Awww
 
And Trump was totally immune to propaganda against him by a infinite amount of sources on the net, right? That shit's a wash, and complaining about it in this day and age is pathetic. Candidates will be subject to a slew of nonsense on the net from here on out. Believing that Russians were the only people doing this during the elections is absurd. Anyone can make a website, and anyone can spam message boards with bots.



That's adorably hysterical, but I'm Canadian.

Amusing that you're still not addressing the crux of the situation though, which is that if the DNC wasn't a bunch of corrupt bunch of fuckwads behind closed doors, none of this would've been an issue. Not to mention Obama's indifference towards it all. I guess he's a traitor too, since he didn't give a shit when he knew it was going on.
Yeah, so anyone could do it, because the have State sponsored levels of cyber resources available. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top