- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 10,941
- Reaction score
- 1
Who knows what they discussed, do you? He lied about having a meeting period, so did Kushner, so did Manafort. Then mini Trump went on Fox and said that was the whole story "thats everything", suddenly more information came out the next day and we found out he was lying his Trump ass off again. Let me guess, you want to believe whatever he says...right?
From Bauer:
But this is highly suggestive of a potential violation of the law on two counts. Number one, it demonstrates that the campaign as a whole had the intent to court support, receive support, solicit support from a foreign national source, in this case, the Russia government.
Second, the meeting itself could constitute illegal solicitation of support from a foreign national under campaign finance law. So, it both has broad legal significance, and on that one specific issue of liability, has a more concrete significance.
Yes. I’m talking here about a statute that has been on the books for many years that Congress tightened in 2002 that prohibits receiving and soliciting contributions from a foreign national or providing the foreign national with substantial assistance in trying to influence a U.S. election.
People are trying to pretend different, but the law is literal. What do you think contributions means in regards to campaign finance? As for lying. I've already said I don't like lying. But that's about all ya got so far at least no?