- Joined
- Sep 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,020
- Reaction score
- 0
is it OK to say VUK OV AG*OT!Fuck CNN
![]()
Last edited:
is it OK to say VUK OV AG*OT!Fuck CNN
![]()
1 LIKE?Paul Rand is a horrible human being who had to back-step when asked a direct question.
Dem guns doe.....
![]()
Of course. My point is: Unlawful presence is not a crime.
It still is a violation of law which can be punished and has consequences for the alien.
That's just the way it is in the US.
You might want to read this:
https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default...iles_Memoranda/2009/revision_redesign_AFM.PDF
Not watching a CNN video, but if she's breaking a law, the law should be enforced. There's lots of laws I don't like, but I don't get to just break them without consequence.
You could say the same thing in 1860 about a legal free black man and illegally free black man run off the plantation.. Sometimes, fuck the law. In this case, fuck the law. She shouldn't be deported but her parents should be.What a dumb cunt.
Only a dumb ass liberal idiot gets confused as to what the difference between ILLEGAL and LEGAL immigrant is.
She was brought over as a kid and has lived almost her entire life here. She had no control over that.
She shouldn't be deported. The laws should be re-written so that she doesn't have to constantly worry about being deported. She's currently a criminal. She shouldn't be.
Her parents absolutely should be deported though.
You could say the same thing in 1860 about a legal free black man and illegally free black man run off the plantation.. Sometimes, fuck the law. In this case, fuck the law. She shouldn't be deported but her parents should be.
Thats for entry and fraud, not illegal status.
She was brought over as a kid and has lived almost her entire life here. She had no control over that.
She shouldn't be deported. The laws should be re-written so that she doesn't have to constantly worry about being deported. She's currently a criminal. She shouldn't be.
Her parents absolutely should be deported though.
The point in contention is that Trump is targeting ILLEGAL immigrants. You know? Those people who said "fuck you" to the immigration system, snuck across that giant ass border...had sex, made a baby and now dwell in those stupid fuckign sanctuary cities Obama funded, living off of government cheese and guilt.
Fuck em. Send em all back.
That's where the wall comes in. If they make it around the wall and get their children here, they succeeded. Good for them. Their children should be able to stay but they need to go back.I generally agree that it's unfair on several levels to deport someone like that. The objection is that this type of amnesty encourages immigrants to bring their children illegally, since the children have a chance to remain despite their status.
That's where the wall comes in. If they make it around the wall and get their children here, they succeeded. Good for them. Their children should be able to stay but they need to go back.
" when your side has blocked every single attempt at creating laws for these people to regularize their status.
It's mostly people who live in areas with almost no Hispanics that hate us the most.