• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

"Do You Think I Should Be Deported?"

First if you actually belived they were going to deport 11 million people then I don't know what to say.

If you have a criminal record you should be gone.

Then if you came here as an adult then you committed a crime and might stay if you meet the requirements and take the decided punishment. This is the same for older minors that crossed without family.

If you were very young and meet the requirements then their should be a parh for citizenship.
 
Paul Ryan fielded some tough questions at the town hall the other night. The woman in the video was brought into the country as a child and has lived here for over 20 years. She asked Ryan if he thinks she should be deported. His response.



Short synopsis;
- No, he doesn't think she should be deported
- No mass deportation
- Trump team is focused on violent illegals

What do you guys think? This seems to directly contradict Trump's campaign promises of deporting 11 million illegals. I think many predicted this would occur from the onset.

UPDATE: I can't believe I need to add this, but since so many people failed to comprehend the point of the OP, I'll restate. The question isn't whether YOU believe the woman should be deported, it's whether or not what Paul Ryan says contradicts Trump's campaign promise to deport all illegals.


hello there KILL KILL,

Mr. Ryan was decidedly lukewarm in his "support" of Mr. Trump during the 2016 elections, so it really doesn't surprise me that he's not onboard with the idea of mass deportations.

i think Ryan's main objectives remain the same as they've always been; to lower taxes on the wealthy whilst figuring out a way to send Social Security monies out of the public sector and on to Wall Street.

more surprising to me is how a staggering proportion of Trump cabinet nominees seem to hold views that are antithetical to the President elect.

- IGIT
 
Paul Ryan fielded some tough questions at the town hall the other night. The woman in the video was brought into the country as a child and has lived here for over 20 years. She asked Ryan if he thinks she should be deported. His response.



Short synopsis;
- No, he doesn't think she should be deported
- No mass deportation
- Trump team is focused on violent illegals

What do you guys think? This seems to directly contradict Trump's campaign promises of deporting 11 million illegals. I think many predicted this would occur from the onset.

UPDATE: I can't believe I need to add this, but since so many people failed to comprehend the point of the OP, I'll restate. The question isn't whether YOU believe the woman should be deported, it's whether or not what Paul Ryan says contradicts Trump's campaign promise to deport all illegals.

cfbf6548ab86fe0eb1b254a25a2b2c823ea816000bad50b4ff7a04aa0e0aec59.jpg
 
Right, and I'm telling you it's lazy thinking on your part to believe everyone who disagrees with your perspective hates brown people.

Believe what you want, but you look foolish opening a statement with:

Again, give me one valid reason to oppose the DREAM act.
 
Again, which law is she violating? link to criminal code please.
Dude your posts in this thread are terrible opposite to your usual posts.
Now you're denying that unlawful presence is a violation of law? lmao, don't make a fool out of yourself.
It's not a crime, it's a violation of federal immigration law and can be punished, not by criminal but civil penalties (removal)
 
Every illegal can be deported. We're not going to line up buses or planes, it's not that easy. It will take time. Lots of time. We didn't get here overnight, and we won't fix it overnight. Secure the border, then start deporting as you encounter them. Schools, hospitals, traffic stops, seeking employment, etc.
It may take 20 years to get a good start, but talking does nothing. So let's get started. Many will self-deport once there are no monetary benefits to being here illegally.
And the 11 million figure is laughable. I would guess we have three or four times that many here at present. No telling, really. Maybe more.

No minds will be changed on the internet today, so I guess this particular topic is not going to be constructive and I will agree to disagree.
 
Again, give me one valid reason to oppose the DREAM act.

Think about what you're saying to me:

Those who defend the Dream Act hate brown people.
Please engage me in a conversation where you defend the Dream Act.

No thanks. I know how this ends. For the record, I never said that I do or do not agree with the Dream Act, I said people may have objections that don't fit nicely into your "you must hate brown people" box. It took me all of 5 seconds to Google some objections.

It seems like your position is concrete, so there's nothing else to speak about here.
 
Every illegal can be deported. We're not going to line up buses or planes, it's not that easy. It will take time. Lots of time. We didn't get here overnight, and we won't fix it overnight. Secure the border, then start deporting as you encounter them. Schools, hospitals, traffic stops, seeking employment, etc.
It may take 20 years to get a good start, but talking does nothing. So let's get started. Many will self-deport once there are no monetary benefits to being here illegally.
And the 11 million figure is laughable. I would guess we have three or four times that many here at present. No telling, really. Maybe more.

No minds will be changed on the internet today, so I guess this particular topic is not going to be constructive and I will agree to disagree.
Wait you think there's at least 44 million illegal immigrants?
 
Again, give me one valid reason to oppose the DREAM act.

Who judges the validity of said reason(s)? You? Pass.
We already know you have your mind made up and racism/xenophobia is the only possible explanation. You stated it verbatim in this thread.
Hard to reason with that.
 
Dude your posts in this thread are terrible opposite to your usual posts.
Now you're denying that unlawful presence is a violation of law? lmao, don't make a fool out of yourself.
It's not a crime, it's a violation of federal immigration law and can be punished, not by criminal but civil penalties (removal)

1.- No, im denying that unlawful presence is a crime.

2.- So you accept she is not a criminal by default which is the point i was arguing.
 
Who judges the validity of said reason(s)? You? Pass.
We already know you have your mind made up and racism/xenophobia is the only possible explanation. You stated it verbatim in this thread.
Hard to reason with that.

Valid as in logically consistent, if you claim you opposed illegals because they are illegal or because they are moochers why are you opposing legislation that would help those that contribute to regularize its status?
 
Wait you think there's at least 44 million illegal immigrants?

I have no idea. Nobody does. I didn't say "at least 44 million", either. You're putting words in my mouth by stating it that way. I think there are FAR more than this administration would ever report, I'll leave it at that.
 
And the 11 million figure is laughable. I would guess we have three or four times that many here at present. No telling, really. Maybe more.

No minds will be changed on the internet today, so I guess this particular topic is not going to be constructive and I will agree to disagree.

11 million x 4 = 44 million

You guess there's at least that many illegal immigrants?

I have no idea. Nobody does. I didn't say "at least 44 million", either. You're putting words in my mouth by stating it that way. I think there are FAR more than this administration would ever report, I'll leave it at that.
 
11 million x 4 = 44 million

You guess there's at least that many illegal immigrants?

I've already answered that I have no idea except that it is a multiple of 11. I did not say "at least 44 million". But it may indeed be 30-40 million. I don't know. And neither do you. Nobody does. That is the point.
 
Back
Top