"Do You Think I Should Be Deported?"

[Liquid Smoke]

yes

So you plead guilty to the crime of creating a shit thread?

See, that's how you ask a direct question. Listen and learn Comrade Killsky.

 

[Joe Wong]

If they are not here legally, then they should be gone. She had 20 years to apply for citizenship. She is obviously not responsible enough to be in the USA.

LOL give me a break. What about all the backwood rednecks and the like that are irresponsible? What should be done with them?

 

[Devout Pessimist]

Nope. Just sad.

Why not both deplorable and sad?

 

[KILL KILL]

We don't have free will in Canada. Canada is a welfare, nanny-state that heavily regulates and taxes everything. You need permission from nanny government to do almost anything. You cannot even defend yourself from criminals in Canada without the nanny state punishing you.

You sound so bitter. Provide examples.

 

[Mr. Shickadance]

We don't have free will in Canada. Canada is a welfare, nanny-state that heavily regulates and taxes everything. You need permission from nanny government to do almost anything. You cannot even defend yourself from criminals in Canada without the nanny state punishing you.

OK so no need to listen to you you don't have free thoughts and are controlled apparently.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

LOL give me a break. What about all the backwood rednecks and the like that are irresponsible? What should be done with them?

The difference is that they were born in the country while the woman is not a legal citizen. What the hell was she doing for 20 years?

 

[Bunk Moreland]

explain

Sticking to a positions and running with it. Not necessarily what trump is doing in the case of deportation.

 

[skullmaskkid]

if you close and police the border in the future then I think most people would be ok with providing a path to citizenship for someone like her

 

[Buck Swope]

So you plead guilty to the crime of creating a shit thread?

See, that's how you ask a direct question. Listen and learn Comrade Killsky.

The irony here is thick.

 

[KILL KILL]

So you plead guilty to the crime of creating a shit thread?

See, that's how you ask a direct question. Listen and learn Comrade Killsky.

It's a solid thread. It has created dialogue.

 

[Seano]

I think that's fair.

Of course its fair. People used to come to the US to try to make a greater life for themselves. Now its just about what area of the country has the easiest to manipulate welfare. We should be about helping people make a better live for themselves. Not supporting them with gov't money for the rest of their lives because they managed to get here somehow.

 

[Joe Wong]

The difference is that they were born in the country while the woman is not a legal citizen. What the hell was she doing for 20 years?

Who knows what she was doing. I was quoting your "not responsible enough to be in the US", as if everyone here is on top of their shit.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

Who knows what she was doing. I was quoting your "not responsible enough to be in the US", as if everyone here is on top of their shit.

I meant it in the context that she had 20 years to apply for citizenship and did not bother to do so. I agree there is nobody who is perfectly responsible, but you would think applying for US citizenship within 20 years of living in a country you are not a citizen of would be a priority. Obviously, something is wrong when there is no desperation for someone to apply for citizenship to a country they are not living in legally.

 

[ILLogic]

Lol, I'm not watching a CNN video. Do you have any non-fiction to share?

Cute punchline. I don't watch CNN, but when did Paul Ryan answering a question become fiction.

 

[skullmaskkid]

I meant it in the context that she had 20 years to apply for citizenship and did not bother to do so. I agree there is nobody who is perfectly responsible, but you would think applying for US citizenship within 20 years of living in a country you are not a citizen of would be a priority. Obviously, something is wrong when there is no desperation for someone to apply for citizenship to a country they are not living in legally.

could they apply for citizenship in that time span?

 

[Mark Hunts FIST]

kick out all the felons first, cut number down to 5 mill illegals, reduce number of new illegals in half and we won't care about people like her.


Edit: I'm not saying half of all illegals are felons.

 

[klnOmega]

Cute punchline. I don't watch CNN, but when did Paul Ryan answering a question become fiction.

I don't trust anything on CNN. Never know how they are going to edit these things.

 

[lecter]

1.- Trump picked him because there wasnt any political cost to picking him.

2.- Thats not what i said, you said that its good that Sessions was picked as AG because it would influence Trump on immigration (why not pick him for the DHS then) because...

3.- Poor choice of words, "his contempt"

4.- As irrelevant as bringing the AG into a discussion about immigration.

5.- Indeed, it has absolutely nothing to do with the AG, you brought Sessions into the discussion, not me.

I was just wondering why people were supporting easily the worst choice of Trump back in his hearing, now i see why.

Regarding this post and you post before this one:
DACA was one of many executive orders of President Obama on immigration. I dislike executive orders but even if Trump would use one to repeal it, he'd just restore the status quo before Barry's paper and pencil policies. That's not a case of a hypocritical 'two bads make on good' it's a case of neutralizing one bad. Trump doesn't have to introduce his own ideas, he's supposed to restore the regular rule of law instead of executive wishy-washy policies which protect illegal aliens from our law depending on the president's feelings. It wouldn't be replaced by Trump's, let alone Sessions' own plans. It's not big-government and overreach to repeal them, it was big government and overreach to introduce them the way Barry did.

Also I never said I want the AG of the US to overstep his powers and take actions regarding deportations of "dreamers".
I said that Sessions, who happens to be our AG, will have Trump's ear and previously was an outspoken opponent of DACA.
So was Mike Pence. I do think that both of their opinions will -realistically- be more important than Paul's. So somehow Barry throwing around executive orders day in day out is not government overstepping but hoping that people who surround the president advice him certain things is?
That's turning a complete blind eye to one side and then expect the other side to be holier than the pope

 

[Devout Pessimist]

could they apply for citizenship in that time span?

Is there a reason she could not apply for citizenship within 20 years?

 

[Mr. Shickadance]

I pay attention to what happens in the USA because it often influences what happens in Canada.

and you cant't blame us we already blamed you