International Do you support toppling the Iranian Regime?

No, random countries shouldn't be allowed to conspire together to arbitrarily topple any "regime" they want, especially not by military force.

There are governments in western Europe who are very disliked as well, should Trump be able to regime-change them too, or is it only allowed in certain regions?

ILM = International Law Matters.
 
The truth is those who have supported Iran never believed that negotiations like Obama's treaty were securing a denuclearized Iran, and a safer Middle East. They knew Iran was continuing to pursue nuclear development behind the scenes. They knew they continued to build new centrifuges with higher and higher enrichment percentages. You guys want Iran to possess the "nuclear deterrent". All the jawing on the side is disingenuous distraction.

And, with that mask off, knowing those of you who support Iran openly support their ongoing machinations to obtain a nuclear weapon, I am further cemented in my support of Israel to annihilate that program right now, and anyone who participates in it. I pray they are susuccessful.
Muppets can talk, they just dont realize there is a hand up their ass directing their thoughts and words. Thats pretty much your situation and those who think like you. I don't blame you, you are simply sold a false narrative and a lie enough times until you actually believe it. It's classic propganda at its best, its just that its unique to the US, Israel and to an extent the UK.
The rest of the actual world, doesn't believe any of that nonsense and is against this illegal action and breaking of international law.

This has got nothing to do with Iran having a nuclear weapon. They were FULLY compliant with the Obama deal according to the IAEA.

Trump ripped up the deal.

There was no evidence Iran were building a bomb according to our own intelligence service.

Trump ignored our own intelligence reports, and bombed Iran following Israels lead.

This is about regional hedgemony, an attempt at regime change and controlling resources.

Like I said, these are none of your concerns. Unlike Iraq however, Iran is far more powerful and Russia and China aren't going to sit idly by either and allow their ally to be destroyed.

As colonel Macgregor has said "We think we can just blow stuff up, and nothings going to happen to us. We are going to be in for an eduction".

Those like you in particular, but particularly those who actually matter who are in power are going to be taught some tough but necessary lessons in the coming weeks and months, thats for sure.
 
This is about regional hedgemony, an attempt at regime change and controlling resources.
It's "hegemony". LOL, duh, obviously our nation has long sought to undermine Iran's ability to project its power as our prime antagonist in the region.

But please explain to me oh majestic only-man-alive-that-thinks-for-himself, if Trump has signaled he considers the matter resolved with the destruction of the three nuclear sites, where is the regime change? And what resources have seen their control changed by virtue of the American bombing?

Also, if they aren't building a bomb, can you explain why the IAEA found uranium particles enriched to 83.7% at Iranian sites? Explain to me for what purpose they would do that.
 
I don't know, but having the current group of black robe wearing gangsters running things is a toxic situation.

Fortunately Christianity seems to be on the rise and belief in islam is in sharp decline in that country. I sincerely wish the best for the Iranian people.
 
I don't know, but having the current group of black robe wearing gangsters running things is a toxic situation.

Fortunately Christianity seems to be on the rise and belief in islam is in sharp decline in that country. I sincerely wish the best for the Iranian people.

I think this might be lazy propaganda.
 
It's probably AI?

Some other posters cut and paste chatGPT stuff. They present it with some of their own thoughts then you get the cut and paste job.

The idea has been around for a while, but as soon as Israel started targeting Iran there was a glut of posts about Iranians supposedly celebrating their own downfall. I think only one of the photos that were shared was actually legit, present, and realistically plausible.

The rest was an obvious attempt to force a narrative that the West is pushing, that Iranians desperately want rid of the regime and are about to rise up.

We'll see. Seems unlikely, but with all those dead generals, now would be the time. I'm surprised they haven't acted already given how strongly they supposedly feel.
 
No, random countries shouldn't be allowed to conspire together to arbitrarily topple any "regime" they want, especially not by military force.

There are governments in western Europe who are very disliked as well, should Trump be able to regime-change them too, or is it only allowed in certain regions?

ILM = International Law Matters.

But Bro, we need cheap oil and opium. And our President's Family NEEDS majestic beachfront resorts built on the bones of children!!
 
The idea has been around for a while, but as soon as Israel started targeting Iran there was a glut of posts about Iranians supposedly celebrating their own downfall. I think only one of the photos that were shared was actually legit, present, and realistically plausible.

The rest was an obvious attempt to force a narrative that the West is pushing, that Iranians desperately want rid of the regime and are about to rise up.

We'll see. Seems unlikely, but with all those dead generals, now would be the time. I'm surprised they haven't acted already given how strongly they supposedly feel.

Attacks like this, if they fail, legitimize the reign of the regime for another two generations minimum. Protectionism makes uninformed populations get behind the most insane of zealot lunatic sociopathic con artists.
 
Attacks like this, if they fail, legitimize the reign of the regime for another two generations minimum. Protectionism makes uninformed populations get behind the most insane of zealot lunatic sociopathic con artists.

Absolutely.

That's probably why a desperate Israel will take out Khamenei very soon, IMO.

But all that will happen is the next-in-line will be super-duper legitimized, and it won't be the Western choice, either.
 
Absolutely.

That's probably why a desperate Israel will take out Khamenei very soon, IMO.

But all that will happen is the next-in-line will be super-duper legitimized, and it won't be the Western choice, either.
I’ve been told Ex-Pat Persians that Prince Reza Pahlavi will liberate Iran and transition the country into a liberal democracy….

The only issue is that the guy has never held a job in his entire life so I’m skeptical lmao
 
I’ve been told Ex-Pat Persians that Prince Reza Pahlavi will liberate Iran and transition the country into a liberal democracy….

The only issue is that the guy has never held a job in his entire life so I’m skeptical lmao
Always important to remember that the first wave of expats usually have less of a connection to their former country because if you could flee, you were more likely to be rich and part of the hated regime that got overthrown.
 
No, random countries shouldn't be allowed to conspire together to arbitrarily topple any "regime" they want, especially not by military force.

There are governments in western Europe who are very disliked as well, should Trump be able to regime-change them too, or is it only allowed in certain regions?

ILM = International Law Matters.
This is what I came to say. Just because we don't like someone doesn't means we need to go destroy them and insert ourselves into every fight.
 
Iran has been a SHITTY country to be a citizen of since 2021. And that shittiness is still at it's peak today. If the people haven't risen up by now than there is no hope for them in the future.
 
No, and you don't belong anywhere near the Middle East.
Next time Kuwait screams and cries for our help, we'll just tell them what the almighty Hdfi said. I'm sure they'll understand.
 
Always important to remember that the first wave of expats usually have less of a connection to their former country because if you could flee, you were more likely to be rich and part of the hated regime that got overthrown.
Just breezed through a Reddit ama of an young jranian expat working just to send money to his family(father and sister). They're far from rich and are not a fan of the current regime and are more optimistic of having the prince takeover. Also, leave it to theocracy to make people leave their religion.
 
Just breezed through a Reddit ama of an young jranian expat working just to send money to his family(father and sister). They're far from rich and are not a fan of the current regime and are more optimistic of having the prince takeover. Also, leave it to theocracy to make people leave their religion.
There's next to no evidence that the "prince" has a base of support within Iran. What makes you think he will be popular there?

And like I said, statistically speaking, expats from the first wave tend to be wealthier. Exceptions come with any rules.
 
There's next to no evidence that the "prince" has a base of support within Iran. What makes you think he will be popular there?

And like I said, statistically speaking, expats from the first wave tend to be wealthier. Exceptions come with any rules.
Buddy, I'm just reading an ama. That prince might as well be like the Korean prince ousted by Japan imperial forces(ironically living in Japan)- useless.
 
Back
Top