Opinion Do people really like Adolf Hitler?

Do you like Adolf Hitler


  • Total voters
    110
  • Poll closed .
Yeah i guess some people are either lying either or both to themselves and others about why they like hitler.

And/or you have an obsence ability and desire to compartmentalize his actions

You also sound like a hitler fan boy, go find a new hero to worship. My friends dad survived a nazi firing squad and then joined the army...THATS a bad ass, not hitler

If a guy raped your mom but was a great artist would you buys his work?? And how would you feel if i did, and casually called you a snow flake for being angry with me?

you and the others that responded yes have some serious issues. Your responses are nothing more than rationalizations and you need rethink this.

@WandyWiolentFan

@CauseImbetta

Dude, you miss the first part of my post?

Morally reprehensible....worst crimes against humanity??

Props to your family btw.

Sorry I offended you.
 
His book is best seller now and when shit gets bad....white people always return to their roots. So I am not surprised a lot of posters here admire Hitler. He was a strong leader.....not weak lib.
 
Dude, you miss the first part of my post?

Morally reprehensible....worst crimes against humanity??

Props to your family btw.

Sorry I offended you.

True you did say that

Apology ppreciated, im not perfect either.

The mom analogy is the best way i can express my feelings
 
With Pol Pot and Miosovics, possibly. With Stalin? Bitch, please. Uncle Joe killed more Russians through purges etc than the Nazis managed in four years of total war. Stalin was just as ruthless as Hitler. The difference between them was their beliefs and motivations(not that it mattered to their victims).

Hitler was a fanatic. He actually believed that shite about the Thousand Year Reich and the destiny of the Aryan Race. By contrast, Stalin was a gangster. He only cared about securing his own power. He was far more pragmatic than Hitler.

whoa motherfucker how about you calm down with the calling people bitch shit. I wasn't talking about kill count but in terms of them being monsters of the 20th century. dont forget about uncle mao
 
I know one person who likes Hitler, but he's a Nazi of sorts so I guess that isn't a surprise.

Why yes, I do have rather colorful acquaintances. And some that are very much against color.
<{hfved}>
 
I'd say, at least in this country (USA) you never get a fair history of things. So you're taught from a young age that Hitler is basically on par with the devil in terms of evil and that's about it. There's no pretext to why or how etc, no attempts at understanding how the events occurred whether they were reprehensible or not (of course they are).

WWI was not necessarily Germany's fault, a number of factors lead to it and if there was blame then it was certainly to be passed around. Afterward the Treaty of Versailles and the Great Depression put Germany in a hopeless, desperate position in which an uprising of some sort was nearly inevitable.

It has it's similarities to ISIS today... Did ISIS spring up out of nowhere? Or out of 20 years and 2 wars, a completely destabilized region and a puppet government that the people in the region reject?

Is ISIS batshit crazy? Of course. But to say they are just purely evil and nothing more is to not tell the story.

The point here is that evil people never classify themselves as evil, they believe their cause is good for some reason, usually based on some flawed ideology.

There's all sorts of reasons that someone could claim the USA is/was evil... we exploit people for political or monetary gain all the fucking time. But whatever, go 'merica. We rock.
 
I'd say, at least in this country (USA) you never get a fair history of things. So you're taught from a young age that Hitler is basically on par with the devil in terms of evil and that's about it. There's no pretext to why or how etc, no attempts at understanding how the events occurred whether they were reprehensible or not (of course they are).

WWI was not necessarily Germany's fault, a number of factors lead to it and if there was blame then it was certainly to be passed around. Afterward the Treaty of Versailles and the Great Depression put Germany in a hopeless, desperate position in which an uprising of some sort was nearly inevitable.

It has it's similarities to ISIS today... Did ISIS spring up out of nowhere? Or out of 20 years and 2 wars, a completely destabilized region and a puppet government that the people in the region reject?

Is ISIS batshit crazy? Of course. But to say they are just purely evil and nothing more is to not tell the story.

The point here is that evil people never classify themselves as evil, they believe their cause is good for some reason, usually based on some flawed ideology.

There's all sorts of reasons that someone could claim the USA is/was evil... we exploit people for political or monetary gain all the fucking time. But whatever, go 'merica. We rock.

What are you really saying? That sociopaths dont see themselves as such? And are created by complex geo political forces?
 
whoa motherfucker how about you calm down with the calling people bitch shit. I wasn't talking about kill count but in terms of them being monsters of the 20th century. dont forget about uncle mao

You cannot seperate the two. They were monsters because they caused the deaths of tens of millions of people. If Hitler had been content to rule Germany and treat the Jews like shit, expel them etc but stop short of killing them, he'd have been an asshole. But not a monster.

And yeah, Mao arguably holds the record as far as kill counts go.

Also: post like a bitch, get treated like a bitch.:)
 
I'd say, at least in this country (USA) you never get a fair history of things. So you're taught from a young age that Hitler is basically on par with the devil in terms of evil and that's about it. There's no pretext to why or how etc, no attempts at understanding how the events occurred whether they were reprehensible or not (of course they are).

WWI was not necessarily Germany's fault, a number of factors lead to it and if there was blame then it was certainly to be passed around. Afterward the Treaty of Versailles and the Great Depression put Germany in a hopeless, desperate position in which an uprising of some sort was nearly inevitable.

It has it's similarities to ISIS today... Did ISIS spring up out of nowhere? Or out of 20 years and 2 wars, a completely destabilized region and a puppet government that the people in the region reject?

Is ISIS batshit crazy? Of course. But to say they are just purely evil and nothing more is to not tell the story.

The point here is that evil people never classify themselves as evil, they believe their cause is good for some reason, usually based on some flawed ideology.

There's all sorts of reasons that someone could claim the USA is/was evil... we exploit people for political or monetary gain all the fucking time. But whatever, go 'merica. We rock.
This is not only an American problem. Pretty much in every country history is taught as black and white. Good vs Evil. Its also the reason why you see so many people across the world who see everything as black and white. Most governments dont really want their population to ask too many questions as an educated society who is focused on whats going on is absolute pain in the ass to rule over in a Democracy. So with the amount of freedom we actually have, you kinda have to dumb down people and simplify things to keep people calm.
 
You cannot seperate the two. They were monsters because they caused the deaths of tens of millions of people. If Hitler had been content to rule Germany and treat the Jews like shit, expel them etc but stop short of killing them, he'd have been an asshole. But not a monster.

And yeah, Mao arguably holds the record as far as kill counts go.

Also: post like a bitch, get treated like a bitch.:)

hitler was never going to stop short of killing them. plus he had a bunch of other people on his kill list. youre separating hitler from reality too with him being content to rule Germany. he had grand plans to make the east living space for germans which would require conquest of those places. even if you somehow contain him to germany, all that aggression would be turned inwards.
 
I'm more of a Genghis Khan kinda dude. Hitler was a gay meth-addict and a coward.
 
I'm more of a Genghis Khan kinda dude. Hitler was a gay meth-addict and a coward.

thing about genghis khan was that his conquests were some of the most pointless conquests in history. all it did was cause lots of and lots of death for the conquered while mongolia remained the same. he is attila the hun on steroids.
 
The man was a genocidal maniac who was pro-socialism, anti-capitalism, pro 'Palestine' (which would make him pro islamofascism), pro collectivism, pro ethnocentrism, anti-individualism, and pro big government. If I was an evil scumbag who didn't care about the fact that he viciously murdered swaths of people, I'd hate him based on his other political policies alone. Those are all tenets that I vehemently disagree with.

Edit: 16 people said 'yes'. That's shameful (unless they're just answering for people in general).
 
Yeah i guess some people are either lying either or both to themselves and others about why they like hitler.

And/or you have an obsence ability and desire to compartmentalize his actions

You also sound like a hitler fan boy, go find a new hero to worship. My friends dad survived a nazi firing squad and then joined the army...THATS a bad ass, not hitler

If a guy raped your mom but was a great artist would you buys his work?? And how would you feel if i did, and casually called you a snow flake for being angry with me?

you and the others that responded yes have some serious issues. Your responses are nothing more than rationalizations and you need rethink this.

@WandyWiolentFan

@CauseImbetta

Triggered lol.

Horrible analogy btw.
 
What are you really saying? That sociopaths dont see themselves as such? And are created by complex geo political forces?

That would be a very simplistic take of course.

How about another example. In school we are largely taught that the mighty USA strolled into WWII and won the war punctuated with the unveiling of the atomic bomb which was a prudent decision to end the war quickly and ultimately save lives that would be lost in a drawn out war.

Go 'merica, WE ROCK!

Except not really, the pacific war was a certainty especially with Russia's involvement on the west side essentially encircling Japan's already completely depleted forces.

No, Mr "negroes were made from mud" Harry Truman nuked two Japanese cities because he wanted the surrender to be on the USA's terms and they didn't want to make concessions to the Russians on the region, it also served as a short lived big stick swing to the Russians... like, seeee this is what WE got.

In the meantime we managed to incinerate a couple civilian populations... meh, they don't look like us, aren't real people... don't matter. It blows me away that more people aren't ASHAMED of that... but instead they wear it like a badge of pride. It would certainly be reasonable that some people might see that act as "evil" right? Harry Truman, president sociopath.

I get that this doubles as weak, liberal revisionist history etc... and I'm not that guy. I'm just saying that we learn things in a manner that isn't always true and distorts the reality of events.
 
"I don't LIKE Hitler, but I do respect the good parts of what he accomplished." -The War Room
 
I'm probably the most pro-genocide poster on Sherdog, and I'm here to tell you that Hitler was a pussy and a failure.

He also chose incorrectly.
 
Back
Top