- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 15,802
- Reaction score
- 19,084
Where?Plenty of dems are complaining
I'm not sure which regulations you are referring to, but you could say I believe American tax revenue should be used to improve the lives of Americans.So progressive regulations aren't a bad thing within reason to you, and you probably feel that we can use capital to pay for the poor?
I feel good with the ticket. And I'm a curmudgeon sometimes.Where?
Well, you said Medicare for all, affordable college and strong social safety net. All of these are paid for by taxes, but also by regulating the system to make it happen. Ie. Force change on a systemic level.I'm not sure which regulations you are referring to, but you could say I believe American tax revenue should be used to improve the lives of Americans.
I’d take Bernie if he wasn’t too old for it. But I’m a socialist Marxist communist antifa shillI feel good with the ticket. And I'm a curmudgeon sometimes.
You see his interview with Theo Von? Dude looks and sounds old, but still has a very quick wit.I’d take Bernie if he wasn’t too old for it. But I’m a socialist Marxist communist antifa shill
Yep. Only his body has aged. He is still brilliant.You see his interview with Theo Von? Dude looks and sounds old, but still has a very quick wit.
Yeah. Even the way he sits is old Jewish style, like he's gotta bad neck.Yep. Only his body has aged. He is still brilliant.
I don't see as going this far either. It's the association because we're under the same general ideology that bugs me.Disagree. Even though I have a strong preference for Democrats winning national elections over Republicans, I have lots of disagreements with Democrats, and I don't feel that whatever they say, I'm saying. It should go the other way too. People should be accountable for their own actions, and organizations are accountable for the actions of their leadership, but everyone who agrees with me about some things doesn't speak for me about everything.
Yeah, looks like the stories are reporting on some level of shitstorm. No one I read was involved in that, and I don't think any prominent politicians were.
I think it’s pointless to talk about supporting policies when you're not a politician and you're just totally tribalistic on all real-world discussions.So progressive regulations within reason aren't a bad thing to you, and you probably feel that we can use capital to pay for the poor?
I think it's pointless to stick on deez nuts, but here we are.I think it’s pointless to talk about supporting policies when you're not a politician and you're just totally tribalistic on all real-world discussions.
It's a bad look for people saying it. I just don't think it's fair to blame other people for who didn't say it for it.I don't see as going this far either. It's the association because we're under the same general ideology that bugs me.
Look at the number of democrats who say the Trump assassination attempt was fake. In the big scheme, I assume it's a negligible number, but it has been trending quite a few times on Twitter. Is it a huge deal? No. Do I think it's bad look? Oh, yes.
Not really interested in your usual unpleasantness, but I'm just saying that "I support X" doesn't work if all you do is lie about people who would actually implement X. In what sense do you support it, then? Has Holmes ever criticized Republicans for voting against the stuff he says he supports?I think it's pointless to stick on deez nuts, but here we are.
I'm just saying that all you do is argue, even with people on your own side. Just chill out every now and then lolNot really interested in your usual unpleasantness, but I'm just saying that "I support X" doesn't work if all you do is lie about people who would actually implement X. In what sense do you support it, then? Has Holmes ever criticized Republicans for voting against the stuff he says he supports?
I never said that though, in fact I've said the opposite. At the state and local level there are many great Republicans out there in red states.By your definition you can't be a centrist unless you vote for democrats.![]()
that's what I thought. NPR is a propaganda network and I have less trust in them than I do breaking points or even Kyle kulinski. because NPR hides the lies much better and more skillfully... nearly never tells a direct lie, but steers people with the way that they frame things. there is nearly always an agenda with NPR.I was just curious as to if you actually watched those videos because I think they do a good job of demonstrating their blind spots but I don't necessarily expect anyone to watch them.
Alternative media is IMO generally less reliable than mainstream outlets so I would not equate Breaking Points with NPR or other more reputable sources. Of course every media org is going to have some biases even if unconscious ones but I think alternative media and especially online populist leaning media has a problem with their fact checking standards.
Even when FOX News was blatantly lying about the 2020 election they had internal fact checkers, called the "brain room", flagging all the false claims despite pundits like Carlson ignoring their warnings. Idk if Breaking Points even has fact checkers.
the correct term is sophist.I think generally you need to stop being such a cunt.
That's actually pretty good. Look at you, with the old Greek terminology.the correct term is sophist.
NoNPR is a propaganda network