Elections DNC today in Chicago

I made a poor assumption that you were a DeSantis supporter?? Are you serious right now?! I see you’re now calling DeSantis racist and fascist. Hmm. Let’s revisit an exchange we had awhile back.




Your response?


I told you that you should be ashamed for supporting it. Were you?




<{you!}>

But the NAACP wasn’t lying, were they? Now you openly admit you’re supporting—even proud of— a racist and fascist, but “the libs made you do it”??? Wow.
Do you think Ron DeFascist put his fascism and racism aside to pass amazing laws for FL—or did those laws he signed in fact embody that racism and fascism, just as I’ve always said?
SKYNET lying about his political beliefs for the sake of appearing more credible? I can't believe it, next thing you'll tell me he identifies as a centrist!
Yes, yes, hip hip, hooray, everyone, I'm melting down, guilty as charged.

What are you gonna do about it? You want to rename the meltdown of the year award to SKYNET the Can award. lol Nothing would fill me with pride more.

Your assessment of my contributions here mean as much to me as the floaters I flushed down after breakfast, but you keep up the good work you are doing here.




There you go, carry on now
What I am going to do about it is to afford your position the respect it deserves which is, namely, none at all. You've embarrassed yourself throughout this thread during your meltdown where you've tagged and quoted people left and right to cry about a couch joke while we have a former president who has convinced two thirds of his party that the last election was stolen despite no credible evidence suggesting as much. It makes you seem like an unserious partisan hack with no self awareness.
 
Yeah, I'm not a gambler.

The "Dems" aren't trying to take anyone out, DonOLD is doing that all by himself by acting like laws do not apply to him.

As far as policies go, how's your 401K now vs. 4 years ago? I bet you're good on toilet paper too. All DonOLD has is Hannibal Lecter, electro-sharks, fear, malice, and loathing for anyone that's not one of his cult members.
The derp state is trying to take out Donnie....
 
Yes, yes, hip hip, hooray, everyone, I'm melting down, guilty as charged.

What are you gonna do about it? You want to rename the meltdown of the year award to SKYNET the Can award. lol Nothing would fill me with pride more.
Sorry, Sherbro. There is no way you deserve that honour more than I do.
 
Saying Jan 6’ers used weapons to take the Capital. Said Trump is gonna lock up journalists. Sayings she’s going to fix the housing crisis when she created it. She stood up there and lied, she’s actually more dangerous that I thought. She didn’t all without even flinching.
Jan 6’ers did use weapons.
Trump has threatened to jail journalists (for example here and also reportedly here).
 
I honestly get the impression that you have never really heard Tim Walz speak and don't actually know who he is. In context his comment about Vance is a non-issue, and your reaction to it is not rational.

It feels like you heard he made fun of JD Vance and were told to be offended, but you aren't entirely sure why.
He came into the thread yesterday pretending he didn’t know the couch fucking story was fake and asking people to confirm it was a lie.
KYTENS then went on this hypercritical outrage session calling Walz a POS.

It’s like he went to bed the night before last and this idea popped into his head as a way to attack Walz and get attention

It’s pathetically sad really.
 
SKYNET lying about his political beliefs for the sake of appearing more credible? I can't believe it, next thing you'll tell me he identifies as a centrist!

What I am going to do about it is to afford your position the respect it deserves which is, namely, none at all. You've embarrassed yourself throughout this thread during your meltdown where you've tagged and quoted people left and right to cry about a couch joke while we have a former president who has convinced two thirds of his party that the last election was stolen despite no credible evidence suggesting as much. It makes you seem like an unserious partisan hack with no self awareness.
Toxic partisanship certainly seems like the most likely explanation for the bizarre reaction
 
Can you give details here? I think this criticism has a lot more meat than others but can't remember the details
Kamala did not create the housing crisis, housing policy is much more dependent on local laws.

What caused the housing crisis is NIMBYism at the local level across the country and specifically the major metro areas.
 
no... you just haven't provided anything but slander and insinuation about :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia. what specifically do you think makes me in support of sex change for minors btw? I speak out about this issue more intelligently than you ever have.

I kind of thought school lunch and breakfast and paid leave for the middle class was a real accomplishment btw. Walz is the best politician of my generation man.
Lol at "speak out about this issue", then turn around and vote for it. That doesn't make you "intelligent", it makes you a phony who will sell out your fake beliefs for an egg mcmuffin. The country has already had a lunch program for 80 years, Minnesota just has taxpayers buy lunch for rich kids too.

I didn't say he was a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile, I said he has no sense of propriety, and you for some weird reason feel obligated to come rushing to his defense and call someone you just heard about 3 weeks ago "the best politician of your lifetime" based on absolutely nothing other than passing all of the same policies California already did years earlier. Hooray, $10 billion in new taxes, a gas tax hike, education getting more expensive yet declining in quality from 5th to 19th. You're what's known as a low information voter who votes based on emotionand vibes and who you hate rather than results. It's not exactly rare, that's most democrats.
 
What I am going to do about it is to afford your position the respect it deserves which is, namely, none at all.
giphy.gif


You've embarrassed yourself throughout this thread during your meltdown where you've tagged and quoted people left and right to cry about a couch joke while we have a former president who has convinced two thirds of his party that the last election was stolen despite no credible evidence suggesting as much. It makes you seem like an unserious partisan hack with no self awareness.
and Im still here to keep you honest.
 
and Im still here to keep you honest.
Quite the contrary, you're here to add partisan white noise to drown out legitimate discussion. Hence your pearl clutching at a throwaway jab during a campaign when the nominee for the GOP is still peddling the lie that the election was stolen which is exponentially more harmful to the national discourse.
 
No, my principled belief is you shouldn't cheat and if you are cheated on, you shouldn't stay with your husband so you can stay in a rich and powerful position.
I think most normal people would say it's ridiculous to say that there's something wrong with trying to keep your family together after infidelity (it's a matter of individual choice), and I'd be surprised if that was your consistent belief.
To pretend like they stayed together because they're family people is ridiculous. Hilary stayed with him because he was one of the most powerful people in the world and it allowed her to eventually run for the presidency based on his achievements. Teaching girls to stay with cheaters so you can get ahead in life is not what good people do.

Also if someone is anti cheating, then they should be anti cheating when it comes to their political foes as well as their political allies. Otherwise that makes you a hypocrite.

Go ahead and twist away Jack.
When people talk about being anti-cheating (and anti-dishonesty, anti-breaking vows, etc.), they're referring to the cheater, not the victim. You really don't know that?
 
This is pretty dumb. 15 vice presidents have become president. “Ceremonial position”? As if taking on the role of president of the United States if something happened to old Biden would just be a “ceremony” and nothing more. Derp.

Everyone and their mom knew Biden likely wasn’t making it 2 terms and she would be the presumptive replacement and voted for Biden’s ticket with that knowledge.

As VP she led voting rights efforts, maternal health rights efforts, pushed gun regulations, etc. Voters seem to like her position on those over trump and JD and trust her to take the mantle on from Joe and some think she may even do better since she’s not old as fuck. Nothing about that makes them sheep.

Is her white guy VP pick a DEI hire because it adds diversify to the ticket? Why is that label only used around here for black politicians?

You're trying too hard and repeating some right wing copy and paste talking points and looking a little sheepish yourself.
*sheep-like

He's too full of himself to be sheepish.
 
He's just leaned into full troll mode. I rarely engage with him because of this but I had a weak moment today lol
I assure you that it's a sincere belief that saying that being cheated on is morally worse than cheating is really stupid, and not something you'd say if you didn't see a partisan angle. And the fact that you're associating with someone like SR says a lot too.
 
I think most normal people would say it's ridiculous to say that there's something wrong with trying to keep your family together after infidelity (it's a matter of individual choice), and I'd be surprised if that was your consistent belief.

When people talk about being anti-cheating (and anti-dishonesty, anti-breaking vows, etc.), they're referring to the cheater, not the victim. You really don't know that?
It is interesting to see the side that wants to restrict no fault divorce fault Hillary for not getting a divorce while excusing Donald for having gotten two already with one on the way.
 
Quite the contrary, you're here to add partisan white noise to drown out legitimate discussion. Hence your pearl clutching at a throwaway jab during a campaign when the nominee for the GOP is still peddling the lie that the election was stolen which is exponentially more harmful to the national discourse.
Basically you showing off how ignorant you are and conveniently disposed of my actual views, just like you interjected into an exchange I had with another poster despite acknowleding my replies which totally expose you and the other poster as being deceitful. But you are a mod and you clearly have no interest in addressing my views in good faith despite how wrong you are so often, essentially because your shit dont stink
 
Back
Top