- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Messages
- 48,179
- Reaction score
- 105,398
'Should' being the key word, and according to totalitarians like yourself that means 80% of the police force must be 80%.
But what if there's not enough latinos applying? What if the latino applicants are fat, undisciplined, or have criminal records?
What if the current police force may have far fewer problems than the national average with the current racial dynamics?
Should black cops be fired to make room for latino rookies?
What if the local latino population are satisfied with the quality of police in their area?
What if 'If its not broke, don't fix it?'
These just a few hypotheticals that you 'DEI-activists for policing' don't even consider before automatically concluding DEI racial quotas are an improvement in every possible situation.
I already basically asked all those questions and these guys completely avoided every one of them. Don't expect any sort of answer and definitely don't expect the reply to have an ounce of honesty to it either.
Nope, you're not dodging those questions with a handwave.All these hypotheticals have painfully obvious explanations and are far from novel you guys love to pat yourself on the back for smooth-brained observations it’s so pathetic lol
We accept your concession.
You don't have to admit you now know what you were arguing for was retarded, everybody but you and @shockaholic12 already knew it was.
Go in peace, and less retarded.
still waiting for you to happily explain all the specific woke scenes from all the recent comic flops like you said you happily would then cried like a bitch when told to go ahead.
I didn't hand wave I addressed them, which is why you had to delete that part of the post like a bitch when you replied to it.Nope, you're not dodging those questions with a handwave.
Go ahead - Say what the consequences should be for all police departments with Chiefs & Captains that'd tell you your DEI fantasy is an impossibility and you should go fuck yourself.
Say what would happen, if there was any realistic political resistance.
That discussion concluded, and you lost, badly.
We've moved on to something you're losing even worse.
didn't hand wave I addressed them, which is why you had to delete that part of the post like a bitch when you replied to it.
What process do you think a DEI-racial quotas in policing would take to be emplimented?You've lost the plot so fucking hard you are now fantasizing about me, a random on the internet, having a conversation with hypothetical police chiefs where they hypothetically hate DEI and tell me off. This is more pathetic than when Trump hired an obama impersonator to pretend fire. You have to skip off to total fairy tale land to tell yourself I'm getting pretend yelled at. This is rock bottom lol.
This was the first 80% of the post you ignored when you quoted it and said I didn’t answer anythingI haven't deleted a single portion of a single post in this entire thread.
I've been accused of editing/deleting posts before. @Islam Imamate confirmed those accusations were false. Would you like him to confirm you're full of shit?
Don't bother. You're proved yourself to be full kf shit many times in this thread.
What process do you think a DEI-racial quotas in policing would take to be emplimented?
That's your problem, you live in a fantasy world without any realistic means to achieve your dreams.
Do you think some legislatures would pass a law?
Do you think there wouldn't be any research done beforehand? With input from anyone with a background in criminal justice? Has anyone with a bachelors in criminal justice endorsed such a plan? How about a masters? Any experienced policemen? Detectives?
You hear about... or rather you're told... about disparages between racial demographics & racial makeup of cops... and you see a problem.
A problem that needs to be solved by firing the wrong colored police and hiring the correct color of police. And you don't bother listen to the obvious issues that would cause far worse problems.
But to you, the only problem would be solved... because you only notice, and care about, the color of people's skin.
Like all racists.
This was the first 80% of the post you ignored when you quoted it and said I didn’t answer anything
Keep proving you're living in a fantasy land by ignoring my earlier post I mentioned practically all major metropolitan police forces are already understaffed & overworked and outreach programs have have already been to recruit... anyone. Not just latinos but anyone qualified.“Should as yes we should strive for that and take measures to achieve something relative to it. No one is checking the census and saying it has to be 8 out of 10 and exactly reflect stats but you accept getting in that ball park as achieving your goal.
If there aren’t qualified Latinos you want on your team available in the prospect pool you hire someone else and continue looking during the next vacancy. No one needs to be fired to achieve vacancies they happen naturally have you ever had a job why does that need to be explained to you like a toddler?
And what about 'low achieving departments?'If it’s high achieving department it’ll have the system in place to train new recruits well, even the ones that speak Spanish. Duh.
And you have no clue how these issues get on election ballots, do you?If they locals don’t want a policy in their PD that’s what local elections are for. Have you ever left your basement
The process is the DEI department helps assess diversity goals and then when vacancies come up help pass along qualified candidates who can help address said goals to whomever is reviewing applicants. If they are deemed qualified by the hiring team after reviewing they hire them. DEI would probably aid in recruiting by working with say local colleges with criminal Justice programs to reach out to community about careers in the department. You never had a real job? This is elementary stuff it is not complicated.
<Lmaoo>You don’t need to fire anyone good at their job because of this wild idea I don’t think you’ve heard of called “retirement”.
You just said every cop good at their jobs would retire, rather than be fired.... because of the color of their skin. And you're accusing ME of having a brain tumor?You are implying job openings only occur after someone gets fired. You might have a brain tumor.
Because they're bullshit.
Keep proving you're living in a fantasy land by ignoring my earlier post I mentioned practically all major metropolitan police forces are already understaffed & overworked and outreach programs have have already been to recruit... anyone. Not just latinos but anyone qualified.
But the fact is cops have been villanized by the media and politicians to the point that POC communities view their own joining police forces as race traitors. Well done. Mission accomplished.
And what about 'low achieving departments?'
And you have no clue how these issues get on election ballots, do you?
Once again... you don't think 'reaching out to the community' hasn't already been attempted? And its not ongoing? Not to fulfill trashy DEI racial quotas but to recruit any qualified people willing to take the job?
Not sure if you've paid attention to the crime rates in Biden's America but there's not many positive headlines related to crime, and there's not many who want to be policemen in warzones.
<Lmaoo>
You think every cop good at their job is near retirement? You know what the retirement policies are for major metropolitan police forces?
Good god, its like you're trying to set a Warroom record for delusional statements in a thread.
You just said every cop good at their jobs would retire, rather than be fired.... because of the color of their skin. And you're accusing ME of having a brain tumor?
I haven't even brought up the legal challenges of how DEI is against federal law. You can't use the 'But they'd make my company more money' bullshit reasoning on this one.
You haven't addressed why you're not in favor of trying it on state-level first... and why not California?
You still haven't referenced any politicians, anyone with policing backgrounds, or anyone with a criminal justice degree that'd endorse DEI for police departments.
Hell, go get some noteable leftists here in the Warroom to say 'DEI Racial Quotas for Police Departments is a brilliant idea' because none of them are coming to your aid on this one.
And you still aren't stating what the consequences would be for police departments that would refuse... because they're already far too understaffed to begin with.
If you haven't figured it out yet, this is fun for me.
I am very much enjoying watching you flail around and expose yourself as an idiot... again... and again... and again... again... and again.
This is like beating up an annoying retarded kid at recess.
Unless it's a PR job, the main likelihood of someone opening new markets will be more based on them contacts in a particular market which often is down to your networking skills not your skin colour, sexuality, disability or gender. It's such a tiny use case that it's barely worth mentioning. Don't get me wrong if I had a multinational business and was expanding into Saudi Arabia then yeah, a Saudi hire would probably be great to help penetrate that market. By the same token, an Australian that had spent 20 years doing business in Saudi would also have a similar effect.the best person for the job is the one the brings in the most profit to my company, not has the most experience. If I a diverse hire helps open new markets that's the best person for my company.
How dare you bring common sense into a thread about shouting slogans?Unless it's a PR job, the main likelihood of someone opening new markets will be more based on them contacts in a particular market which often is down to your networking skills not your skin colour, sexuality, disability or gender. It's such a tiny use case that it's barely worth mentioning. Don't get me wrong if I had a multinational business and was expanding into Saudi Arabia then yeah, a Saudi hire would probably be great to help penetrate that market. By the same token, an Australian that had spent 20 years doing business in Saudi would also have a similar effect.
You are responding to one of the most hilariously inept and nonsensical posts ever written by a self righteous narcissist.I appreciate you answering the questions.
1. So DEI is about hiring people from different schools, not about race, gender or sexual orientation? DEI has nothing to do with immutable characteristics at all? I don't recall proponents of DEI ever mentioning different schools as a reason for the movement but I do recall them talking about immutable characteristics quite a bit.
2. Your example is that the customer is looking to shop at a business that doesn't just hire people from Harvard, but hires from all the top schools. How would a customer obtain the information about the diversity of schools the employees at each company has? Also do you think it's realistic for a person to pour through the backgrounds of the employees at a handful of companies in order to find the company that has the most diverse educational background? Sounds like a lot of work to go shop somewhere.
3. What are the diverse forklift drivers diverse from exactly? Are we still talking about educational backgrounds or are they diverse due to immutable characteristics?
4. What makes you think that a large group of employees would all bring the exact perspective? What is it about them that makes them all think alike? Are we still talking about educational backgrounds or are we talking about them thinking alike because they're all the same race, gender or sexual orientation?
Unless it's a PR job, the main likelihood of someone opening new markets will be more based on them contacts in a particular market which often is down to your networking skills not your skin colour, sexuality, disability or gender. It's such a tiny use case that it's barely worth mentioning. Don't get me wrong if I had a multinational business and was expanding into Saudi Arabia then yeah, a Saudi hire would probably be great to help penetrate that market. By the same token, an Australian that had spent 20 years doing business in Saudi would also have a similar effect.
You are responding to one of the most hilariously inept and nonsensical posts ever written by a self righteous narcissist.
Implying that a candidate from one Ivy League is different from another or even implying that two people from the same 4 year university would be thought-clones is fucking hilarious.
DEI has nothing to do with diversity of thought or bringing untapped value to companies or consumers. At the fundamental core, diversity of thought has far more to do with the means and geography of your upbringing rather than skin color, gender or sexual orientation.
When the narcissist brings up “people like to buy from people that share their values,” that is woke lexicon for follow this leftist cult of nonsense or else.
Part of the reason western civilization thrives is because un-racist folx buy products and services based on… wait for it… wait for it… the fucking quality of the product or services themselves.
You see, this radical leftist religion is trying to create an issue where there isn’t one in order to grant C suite jobs to grifters, perpetuate divide and ensure perpetual victimhood and votes.
How dare you bring common sense into a thread about shouting slogans?
not going to read this drivel.Remember when you implied "the church of netflix" didn't know what they were talking about when it came to business sense and you guys had the common sense.
I mean who would listen to the dummies from the company that has garnered 250 million+ subscribers across the globe and growing. $9 billion in revenue last year and increasing. What do those dummies know about DEI helping capture new markets? 250 million customers? This is clearly is just shouting slogans and not working, right?
I'm sure you have a long list of media companies that spurn DEI outperforming them and gaining more subscribers. I'll wait till you show us who these smart companies are that keep beating these dummies and their slogans.