Media Did Dubois hit Usyk low??

[brundlefly]

It's an opinion so whether they're right or wrong can't be proven.

Nope. That's where you're dead wrong. All it takes is to watch the replay of the punch that dropped usyk. the proof is right there on the tv screen or computer monitor, in living color. Now, you were probably looking at the replay from the angle where it showed usyk's back to screen. but i want you to look at the replay from the angle that is looking directly at the punch as it landed. that is to say, the camera is showing a full frontal of usyk as the punch lands. slow it down. freeze the frame. examine it up close and from across the room, from down below and from sideways... and then play it again, and again and again.... no way to deny it. that punch landed on the beltline.

But maybe you have a point. after all i must have an agenda to keep pushing the truth.

i wonder what could that agenda possibly be?

 

[brundlefly]

Keep it up and this account will be banned just like your last one.

and there you have it..."you better agree with us and go along with our bullshit lies, or we gonna BAN your ass!"

never fails.

 

[Doctor Grudge]

the ref said it was

/end thread

That's a pretty poor argument to say the least.

 

[Kovalev's "Man Bag"]

and there you have it..."you better agree with us and go along with our bullshit lies, or we gonna BAN your ass!"

never fails.

Except you've already been banned before for your nonsense. Your previous accounts were @TownBiz & @intrepid brawler.

 

[brundlefly]

Except you've already been banned before for your nonsense. Your previous accounts were @TownBiz & @intrepid brawler.

wtf are we talking about now? dude, you're off topic...is all this because i'm calling y'all out on this shit?

take my advice. watch knockdown again...then get some much needed help.

 

[Kovalev's "Man Bag"]

wtf are we talking about now? dude, you're off topic...is all this because i'm calling y'all out on this shit?

take my advice. watch knockdown again...then get some much needed help.

It's just a matter of time before you disappear and reappear again under a different name. You're a troll. I'll say it one last time. The shot was ruled low. Most (educated & objective) observers agree no matter who you ask. You couldn't even point out where the beltline was when challenged by another poster in this thread. That's how strong your argument is. Time to get a grip. It's been almost 2 years since the incident. They're heading into a rematch.

 

[brundlefly]

It's just a matter of time before you disappear and reappear again under a different name. You're a troll. I'll say it one last time. The shot was ruled low. Most (educated & objective) observers agree no matter who you ask. You couldn't even point out where the beltline was when challenged by another poster in this thread. That's how strong your argument is. Time to get a grip. It's been almost 2 years since the incident. They're heading into a rematch.

If you have a problem with it being two years ago, why did you even reply to the thread? don't bother to answer. it was a rhetorical question.

you don't even know you're telling on yourself, tryna obfuscate and distract from the truth by talking about it was 2 years ago.... and pretending like its SO OBVIOUS it was a low blow. Dude, this isn't my thread. i didn't start the discussion. this thread began 2 years ago and people are still responding to it, so what does that tell you? i'll tell you this. if dubois had been awarded the ko win he deserved, this thread would nort still be going on.

the fact is, YOU know it was not a low blow. it landed on the beltline. the ref makes the beltline clear before every fight. the commentators and "educated" boxing experts such as tim bradley know what it is too. was bradley lying to the public as well? what was his agenda? to stop the very potentially lucrative fury-usyk rematch?

i just don't understand why you're doing this to yourself. At long last sir, have you no shame?

my advice is to just try and bow out gracefully.

 

[Kovalev's "Man Bag"]

the ref makes the beltline clear before every fight.

Wrong. The ref did not permit beltline shots or else he would've pointed it out in the ring before the glove touch. He didn't have an issue with the height of either fighters' trunks even though Dubois' were even higher than Usyk's were. The beltline is only fair game when the trunks are deemed to be high.

 

[brundlefly]

Wrong. The ref did not permit beltline shots or else he would've pointed it out in the ring before the glove touch. He didn't have an issue with the height of either fighters' trunks even though Dubois' were even higher than Usyk's were. The beltline is only fair game when the trunks are deemed to be high.

dubois got robbed. he knocked out usyk and the world saw it. that's why this thread still exists. but because it's boxing, most people don't care. boxing is considered the dumpster diver of pro sports. it's fucking appalling and disgraceful and officiating like what we saw in this fight is the reason why.

 

[Kovalev's "Man Bag"]

dubois got robbed. he knocked out usyk and the world saw it. that's why this thread still exists. but because it's boxing, most people don't care. boxing is considered the dumpster diver of pro sports. it's fucking appalling and disgraceful and officiating like what we saw in this fight is the reason why.

More crying. The fact is that Luis Pabon, the official who reffed that fight, did not indicate beltline shots were allowed. We have the fight footage. Secondly, for all you know Usyk would've gotten back up if the ref started to count. Your assumption that Usyk wouldn't have beaten the count is purely speculative. It doesn't hold water. We get that you're angry with the call but go throw your tantrum somewhere else.

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

wtf are we talking about now? dude, you're off topic...is all this because i'm calling y'all out on this shit?

take my advice. watch knockdown again...then get some much needed help.

Funny, since you don't respond to being called out on your bullshit

 

[Blastbeat]

Lemme ask you a question. what is it you think you stand to gain by denying reality? I mean, I know this is an anonymous forum so who cares about your reputation on these message boards, right? but I'm thinking you and your fellow denialists are trying to salvage something that must be as important as your self-identity. you don't give a shit if anybody with two brain cells can see that you are lying your ass off. you don't give a good god damn!...i mean, it's right there. in front of your eyes. you could say something less insane such as "well usyk had his belt way up high." but that's not even what you're saying...you're just saying "fcuk reality, it is what i want it to be." damn, son.

no, im not denying reality.
youre biased, very biased. it seems you favor "certain" fighters. ive seen your posts.

the ref ruled it a low blow. did you see Usyk bringing in all those images to the press conference of low blows? there were quite a few of them. i give a damn because whenever you get called out as being wrong, you slink away for a few months and then come back with your airhead takes thinking that people dont remember. Dubois is a paper champ with a gifted belt.

and how about all those headbutts he threw at Hrgovic and was warned by the ref multiple times for? do those just not matter at all?

well guess what, you were wrong about Inoue, you were wrong about the HW division and now youre wrong about Dubois. no amount of whining on your part will prevent you from being wrong. the WBA looked at the replay and determined the ref was in the right. so the ruling stands. and you cant STAND that youre wrong, so you double down and keep posting the same opinions while throwing in insults and jabs at peoples' intelligence for disagreeing with you.

you keep pushing narratives that YOU want to be true, all while claiming thats what other people are doing. the official ruled it low, Dickpuncher got his ass kicked the whole rest of the fight, and the WBA also ruled it low. go back to watching Dontae's Boxing Nation, you drooling invalid.

 

[Blastbeat]

Man was hit in the gut and went down.
We all saw it.

I say Good Day

whats the matter? didnt have a counter for my last argument?

youre not the ref, youre not the WBA, you dont get to make the call!

good day indeed, paper champ defender!

 

[brundlefly]

no, im not denying reality.
youre biased, very biased. it seems you favor "certain" fighters. ive seen your posts.

the ref ruled it a low blow. did you see Usyk bringing in all those images to the press conference of low blows? there were quite a few of them. i give a damn because whenever you get called out as being wrong, you slink away for a few months and then come back with your airhead takes thinking that people dont remember. Dubois is a paper champ with a gifted belt.

and how about all those headbutts he threw at Hrgovic and was warned by the ref multiple times for? do those just not matter at all?

well guess what, you were wrong about Inoue, you were wrong about the HW division and now youre wrong about Dubois. no amount of whining on your part will prevent you from being wrong. the WBA looked at the replay and determined the ref was in the right. so the ruling stands. and you cant STAND that youre wrong, so you double down and keep posting the same opinions while throwing in insults and jabs at peoples' intelligence for disagreeing with you.

you keep pushing narratives that YOU want to be true, all while claiming thats what other people are doing. the official ruled it low, Dickpuncher got his ass kicked the whole rest of the fight, and the WBA also ruled it low. go back to watching Dontae's Boxing Nation, you drooling invalid.

now comes the accusations of racism. what a surprise..you guys are so predictable and pathetic. i say dubois got robbed because the blow wasn't low, so i MUST be racist, right? you see it as, i'm up here trying to disparage your hero. and you need to believe he's unbowed. so, the first thing that comes to your mind is that your race is being attacked.

dude, if that's what all this long ass thread of denialism is about, you should have just said so. i don't have a problem with the fact the only reason you root for uysk is because of his race. just say "i don't give a shit about sport of boxing. i'm just want to see the white guy get the win, no matter how bogus. because even if it's unfair, the W next to his name supports my narrative." i would have long walked away from this thread. i know a lotta other people would have as well. the only reason people are still on here arguing it wasn't a low blow is because we thought you were actually a boxing fan, but that you were a usyk fanboy who was too deluded to see the truth.

now that i know the true reason, there's no further reason for me to respond to any further posts from you on this thread.

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

now that i know the true reason, there's no further reason for me to respond to any further posts from you on this thread.

You've proven to have a bar lower than even Dubois' punches for ignoring people.

 

[randomg1t]

now that i know the true reason, there's no further reason for me to respond to any further posts from you on this thread.

if you could extend that to every user and every thread, that'd be grat.

 

[brundlefly]

if you could extend that to every user and every thread, that'd be grat.

interesting reply. something you wanna just come right out and say?

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

interesting reply. something you wanna just come right out and say?

That wasn't an insinuation, he was very direct with you. It'd be better if you stopped responding to everyone, everywhere. How did you think that was subtle?

 

[randomg1t]

That wasn't an insinuation, he was very direct with you. It'd be better if you stopped responding to everyone, everywhere. How did you think that was subtle?

sharp as a fuckin cue ball, that one.

 

[Hagler]

Except you've already been banned before for your nonsense. Your previous accounts were @TownBiz & @intrepid brawler.

This guy was definitely Turpid Wanker indeed. Let's hope his existence gets more fulfilling at some point.