- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
- Messages
- 14,219
- Reaction score
- 50,848
So which is it ?:
i'm not sure you are familiar with the rules of boxing, being hit in the "balls" isnt really a thing, that would suggest you think a low blow is someone getting hit in the testicles, it isntUsyk wears his shorts high for this very reason. His team knows he’s weak to the body. This wasn’t a low blow to me. Where do you think his balls are? On his stomach? I get the technical definition of “low blow.” But there’s also the practical definition. Usyk was not hit in the balls there. He got hit in the stomach.
So where on his body do you think he got hit?i'm not sure you are familiar with the rules of boxing, being hit in the "balls" isnt really a thing, that would suggest you think a low blow is someone getting hit in the testicles, it isnt
The bladder which isn't legal. His punch hit the groin protector. That's why the WBA rejected Team Dubois' appeal over the decision.So where on his body do you think he got hit?
no, he didntthe punch was ON the beltline. NOT a low blow. Dubois KO'd usyk. That's the bottomline. But then again this is boxing. PED users get celebrated (Lyin' Ryan), fighters get robbed on a cut (charly suarez) and champions blatantly duck their contenders (canelo)
imagine thats the first punch he throws immediately after the bell ringsusyk should bolo the knackers, test dubious' resolve
The mans an idiot but hes right on this one.the punch was ON the beltline. NOT a low blow. Dubois KO'd usyk. That's the bottomline.
the ref said it wasThe mans an idiot but hes right on this one.
That wasn't a low blow.
In the days of replay and overturns, that's not the case sir.the ref said it was
/end thread
it was 2 fucking years ago...lolIn the days of replay and overturns, that's not the case sir.
If they can review Navarrete-Suarez, they can review Usyk-Dubois.
\continue thread
they did!In the days of replay and overturns, that's not the case sir.
If they can review Navarrete-Suarez, they can review Usyk-Dubois.
\continue thread
An independent organization.they did!
and the WBA decided it was a low blow.
next!
"no biases" is nearly impossible to achieve in all of humanity, nevermind a historically corrupt sport such as boxing.An independent organization.
A boxing council that handles matter with no biases.
Not the organzations themselves.
The WBA reviewed it after Team Dubois protested the referee's call. They had no issue with it. Were they just siding with Team Usyk? I doubt it. Twice as many people thought the shot was low. More recently the WBA didn't side with Tank when he took a knee. The president of the WBA came out and said that it should've been ruled a knockdown and that the ref shouldn't have stopped counting.In the days of replay and overturns, that's not the case sir.
If they can review Navarrete-Suarez, they can review Usyk-Dubois.
\continue thread