International Did COVID come from a Lab in China? US Energy Dept asserts it was a lab leak [megathread]



Did this make it into the thread at any point. Holy crap that's a smoking gun on the Fauci and GOF coffin.

This should be called the America virus... Made in China.
 
At this point not believing in the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis makes you a CT nutter.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/wuhan-...beijing-covid-origins-coronavirus-11629037765

The World Needs to Know What Happened at the Wuhan Lab
Was the coronavirus manipulated to infect humans? If so, that will inform our response.

https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2023

Peter Ben Embarek, who led the scientists dispatched by WHO to Wuhan, told a Danish television documentary, broadcast on 12 August, that the Chinese scientists refused to even discuss the lab leak scenario2unless the final report dismissed any need for further investigation.

Having haggled about it until 48 hours before they left China, Ben Embarek said, his Chinese counterpart eventually agreed to discuss the lab leak theory in the report “on the condition we didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis.”


https://nypost.com/2021/08/13/who-scientist-eyes-on-wuhan-lab-that-moved-before-pandemic/

WHO scientist wants closer look at Wuhan lab that moved days before COVID-19 outbreak
 
At this point not believing in the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis makes you a CT nutter.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wuhan-...beijing-covid-origins-coronavirus-11629037765
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wuhan-...beijing-covid-origins-coronavirus-11629037765

The World Needs to Know What Happened at the Wuhan Lab
Was the coronavirus manipulated to infect humans? If so, that will inform our response.

https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2023

Peter Ben Embarek, who led the scientists dispatched by WHO to Wuhan, told a Danish television documentary, broadcast on 12 August, that the Chinese scientists refused to even discuss the lab leak scenario2unless the final report dismissed any need for further investigation.

Having haggled about it until 48 hours before they left China, Ben Embarek said, his Chinese counterpart eventually agreed to discuss the lab leak theory in the report “on the condition we didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis.”


https://nypost.com/2021/08/13/who-scientist-eyes-on-wuhan-lab-that-moved-before-pandemic/

WHO scientist wants closer look at Wuhan lab that moved days before COVID-19 outbreak

Hey @StoneColdSteveAustin, where you at?
 
Anytime these people are on the TV telling us what to do, half the country stands at attention for their next orders.

Keep following the science guys.
 
Head of WHO Team Investigating Origins of Covid-19 Calls For Closer Look at China Lab

Peter Ben Embarek says investigators should seek more information about Wuhan CDC



The Danish head of a World Health Organization-led team that traveled to China earlier this year to probe the origins of Covid-19 called for closer scrutiny of a laboratory near the site of the first known cluster of cases at a market in the central Chinese city of Wuhan.

In comments broadcast by Denmark’s state-owned TV 2 and confirmed to The Wall Street Journal, Peter Ben Embarek, a food-safety specialist, said investigators should seek more information about the lab, a research facility run by the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Ben Embarek’s remarks mark the biggest departure by a member of the WHO’s team from their view, expressed at a news conference in February, that a laboratory incident was too unlikely to merit further studies.

“It’s interesting that the lab relocated on the 2nd of December 2019: That’s the period where it all started,” Dr. Ben Embarek said in the TV interview. “We know that when you move a lab, it disturbs everything…That entire procedure is always a disruptive element in the daily work routine of a lab


https://www.wsj.com/articles/head-o...alls-for-closer-look-at-china-lab-11628807623
 
Fake news????

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/07/16/...-origins/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

Little new evidence has emerged to move the needle in one direction or another, these people said. But the fact that the lab leak theory is being seriously considered by top Biden officials is noteworthy and comes amid a growing openness to the idea even though most scientists who study coronaviruses and who have investigated the origins of the pandemic say the evidence strongly supports a natural origin.

Current intelligence reinforces the belief that the virus most likely originated naturally, from animal-human contact and was not deliberately engineered, the sources said. But that does not preclude the possibility that the virus was the result of an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where coronavirus research was being conducted on bats -- although many scientists familiar with the research say such a leak is unlikely.
LOL at this being the one who is banned on this page :D
 
This is quite entertaining. When you find your evidence, take a closer look and see if the important shit from Hunter Biden's laptop is there while you're at it, will you?
 
I couldn’t care what some retard thinks tbh. I do care what our 3 letter agencies have to say.

Too bad they never said it when it counted. Would have been real nice if those agencies would have spoke up
 
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsr...ied-summary-of-assessment-on-covid-19-origins

"We judge the virus was not developed as a biological weapon. Most agencies also assess with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 probably was not genetically engineered; however, two agencies believe there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way. Finally, the IC assesses China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of COVID-19 emerged"

"Four IC elements and the National Intelligence Council assess with low confidence that the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection was most likely caused by natural exposure to an animal infected with it or a close progenitor virus"

"One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology"

"Analysts at three IC elements remain unable to coalesce around either explanation without additional information"

"China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19. Beijing, however, continues to hinder the global investigation, resist sharing information, and blame other countries"
 
ETUxj79UUAETval.jpg
 
Back
Top