US oil companies were in Venezuela since 1920 right until Huge Chavez nationalized everything. For literally decades, Venezuelans were on average among the richest people in Latin America.
Venezuela was even the 4th richest country in the world in the 1950's. So obviously the oil money did reach the people.
I don't follow you man. I thought you were more rational than this.
1. Maduro, international law, double standard
Was Maduro bad ? Yeah absolutely. He was a fucking tyrant. He let his people starve when he was eating at Salt Bae. Certified POS.
Should it be dissociated from what Trump did because it's also very bad for the future of the whole world and deligitimize international law and safeguards ? Yes too.
You can't criticize Israel when they break international law and be all up for it when it's the US that does it.
Sounds a hell lot that you're in favour of it because it will ultimately benefit your own country.
2. Oil nationalization = poverty ?
It's not because oil/gas are nationalised that a country is poor. You guys seem to think only Venezuela has nationalized its reserves for some reason and that proves that it's always a failure ?
Ever heard of Norway, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Malaysia, Algeria ? They have all nationalized their oil/gas reserves and it has been a major success for them. It did even work well for Russia, despite the corruption involved, but it granted them economical stability for decades.
Venezuela was led by an incompetent and corrupt administration, so it didn't work out.
I can give counter examples when the oil sector is entirely private and the country is run to the ground by those private oil companies, for the same reasons: incompetence and corruption.
Want the example? Nigeria. All the oil and gas are in the private sector. And it's a total mess where no Nigerians benefit from. Does it mean it can't work out ? No it can in certain cases.
You know that the private oil conglomerates optimize shareholders profits, not national interest right ? You also know that private oil firms have historically supported coups, funded militias and pressured governments?
3. Long term
Trump talking about "running Venezuela" means the world is becoming the wild west. If you're strong you take what you want. Was it already the case ? Yes to a lesser degree. Way lesser.
No way anyone blames Putin or israel without someone saying "trump did it yesterday!".
Plus there is a clear pattern of taking off a dictator without an "after" plan means 20 years later you get the same dictator. And in don't see no plan for the political stability of Venezuela being laid off.
3. Conclusion
I'm sorry but honestly you're just repeating the most "en vogue" talking points. I doubt you knew much about Venezuela economical situation in the 1920s just one week ago. Or what year they nationalized oil. But this "info" is parroted everywhere since the last 48h so here you are repeating it.
It's disappointing man, because I really do have a lot of esteem for you. Your absolutist position is taking me off guard.
There's something else but I'm telling you by DM because I don't want you to take it the wrong way