- Joined
- Jan 18, 2012
- Messages
- 11,943
- Reaction score
- 20,119
Not only do they hold legislative power over them, the contractual ties are deep with most of them..1), the question isnt about total submission to every request, but if even a fraction were accepted due to undue inluence, is that okay or does that skirt the line of what should be acceptable?
2), I could argue that Twitter and social media apps like it are novel in a few ways, but if I accept the similarities to what you decribe that happened historically, I'd still be against it in principle in so far as no content was breaking the law. "New information starts out as misinformation", so im against any suppression against it, especially by proxy from the government.
Those swords are long and sharp.

no you