Social DEI is so dead

[ermac88]

Implemented by a bunch of ivy league weirdos. Brilliant.

Im not following.

What implemented by Ivy League weirdos?

what and as opposed to, who?

 

[Fox by the Sea]

I dont understand what you are trying to type?

Im not following.

Give this poor man a diversity spot in the top 40 best universities in Kentucky.
he's doing his best.

 

[ermac88]

Give this poor man a diversity spot in the top 40 best universities in Kentucky.
he's doing his best.

Hahaha.

I think its the inverse little buckaroo.

But as you are confident in your erudition, perhaps you can decipher what they attempted to communicate, on their behalf?


Im eager to hear your interpretation and contribution.

 

[esotamoc]

I saw them too and I believe it, I just can't see where 450 points come from.

And my point is, if there's a 120-point difference at Harvard, how can there be a 450-point difference at "elite universities," "leading universities" or whatever term they used?



It's extremely unlikely that they're getting rejected everywhere. Not in any significant numbers at least.

Even that kid that had near-perfect SATs a few years back and became famous for getting rejected from about 10 top schools actually did get accepted by 2-4 schools. I can't find the names of these schools anywhere but I'd be willing to bet, they're also extremely high-quality. So he got rejected from MIT, Stanford, and Caltech but accepted to UVA or Rice or Vanderbilt or something.



I think you're the one showing your bias, friend.

Facts are facts and the numbers are very clear. Asians have greater levels of education, higher per year earnings, and greater net worth than all groups, whites included. When broken down further, some subgroups like Indians, Chinese, Koreans are on the high end of this and Hmong, Cambodians, on the lower end. And SAT scores align very closely with wealth.

Your personal story doesn't change the trend because it's an outlier, an exception. Just like the Obama girls being born to wealth and privilege doesn't change that blacks overall have the lowest wealth, income, scores, etc.



It can be argued that Affirmative Action achieved true meritocracy because it took into account the structures that produce certain scores.

Maybe he doesn't want to be judged for being Asian and being representative of a particular group.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Hahaha.

I think its the inverse little buckaroo.

But as you are confident in your erudition, perhaps you can decipher what they attempted to communicate, on their behalf?


Im eager to hear your interpretation and contribution.

It is more than obvious enough.

 

[SuperAlly]

Hahaha.

I think its the inverse little buckaroo.

But as you are confident in your erudition, perhaps you can decipher what they attempted to communicate, on their behalf?


Im eager to hear your interpretation and contribution.

 

[ermac88]

It is more than obvious enough.

It makes sense to you.

"Implemented by a bunch of ivy league weirdos. Brilliant."

Implemented where? in what context? Ive League academia?

What are Ivy League weirdos? As opposed to who? High school dropouts?

No, what you typed makes zero sense.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

It makes sense to you.

"Implemented by a bunch of ivy league weirdos. Brilliant."

Implemented where? in what context? Ive League academia?

What are Ivy League weirdos? As opposed to who? High school dropouts?

No, what you typed makes zero sense.

Everywhere they can.

As opposed to everyone else at this point.

 

[Mr Holmes]

It is more than obvious enough.

Its pretty easy to follow what you're saying.

 

[ermac88]

Everywhere they can.

As opposed to everyone else at this point.

So people who participated in premiere academic institutions, our societies intelligentsia /elite those are the " Ivy League weirdos?"

are implementing DEI everywhere they can? (all facets of presumably American society)


That what you are saying?

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

So people who participated in premiere academic institutions, our societies intelligentsia /elite those are the " Ivy League weirdos?"

are implementing DEI everywhere they can? (all facets of presumably American society)


That what you are saying?

Yep, the Brahminic Confucian weirdos have gone mad.

 

[Hog-train]

This is irrelevant.

The fact that there are a lot of poor asians doesn’t change the fact that the biggest correlating factor for high sat scores is family wealth. The fact that poor asians existing doesn’t magically make them the ones getting denied from Ivy League schools.

Parental income is actually the biggest indicator that a child will succeed and has the highest correlating factor out of every known data point.

It’s the main point that the mod in this thread was missing. It’s easier to get a high sat score when you are going to the best schools where their whole curriculum is around doing good on these tests.

I’ve seen those same kids in uni. Get the best scores in high school then just fizzle out and become nobodies due to the structural change.

How is that irrelevant? All the poor Asians in NYC still have a handicap in admissions despite being from poor backgrounds simply for the color of their skin.

 

[ermac88]

Yep, the Brahminic Confucian weirdos have gone mad.

Of course. As always, the smartest most successful members of our society have run a muck

we should defer to sherbros and dumbest members of our society

"We love the uneducated." - Trump

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Of course. As always, the smartest most successful members of our society have run a muck

we should defer to sherbros and dumbest members of our society

"We love the uneducated." - Trump

Trump even walked that back.

There is booksmart, learn for the test smart and many other kind of smart.
You can defer to the dumbest, we will walk another path.
Successful is a relative term, there are plenty of people with that outside of their bubble.

 

[ermac88]

There is booksmart, learn for the test smart and many other kind of smart.
You can defer to the dumbest, we will walk another path.

I see where you are coming from now. Cheers


"We love the uneducated." - Trump

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

I see where you are coming from now. Cheers


"We love the uneducated." - Trump

The uncredentialed need some loving, but it should be way more skilled and focused.

I cannot come from where the Orange is coming with that.

I am not know in this digital jungle as someone who praises Trump.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Even the most subservient of the american colonies are giving up the dei shit

 

[Mr Holmes]

 

[WhiteMousse]

Well the thing is that these companies never cared about minorities to begin with. They went with this kind of thing because they thought it would get them more money, or better publicity which would theoretically make them more money. If a company is doing something, or not doing something, it's not because they care about people. It's because they think they will get better margins.

 

[SuperAlly]

Canada - proud of stupidity