This is pretty radical - a guy that earns around $20 million a year, and is (probably legitimately) one of the hardest working CEO's around, tells Stanford University students that any fighter that earns $37 million (not sure what that number is in reference to) will suddenly stop chasing their dreams, lose their competitive drive, and cease seeking to create a legacy.
This is such a bizarre argument in a world in which Lionel Messi, Dak Prescott, LeBron James, Roger Federer, Floyd Mayweather, and Lewis Hamilton all somehow manage to give a shit about what they're doing despite earning WAY in excess of the figures Dana is/has/will talk about in relation to MMA.
So if the rule isn't true for soccer, basketball, American football, tennis, boxing OR motor racing, what exactly is Dana basing this bullshit on? Not even his own life as a hardened promoter who would probably die for his job, given how much of his life he's dedicated to it, alludes to this idea that everybody would just suddenly not bother wanting to earn more because they've earned a certain amount of money.
Does it stop billionaires working? Look, we don't need to go down this pathway to understand that Dana is talking complete nonsense.
BUT HERE'S THE RUB...
The second an MMA fighter started topping these lists, he literally did go off the rails, lose all dedication, embark upon a losing streak, and generally prove Dana White right.
I'm talking of course about Conor McGregor.
Conor McGregor, sadly, is the poster boy for Dana White's argument. But then, every sport has kids that lose focus the second they earn enough money to not give a shit. That's okay, that's collateral damage. But the argument that you should keep pay low to keep your dogs hungry?
Utterly stupid.
Agree? Disagree?