dos santos won and defended a championship
cro cop was never #1 at any point
The only reason he wasn't #1 is due to having Fedor and Nog competing at their prime alongside him. Sort of like Malone/Stockton not having a ring.
dos santos won and defended a championship
cro cop was never #1 at any point
have cro cop at 3 but i wouldn't argue if someone had him at 2. he did destroy nog the whole fight, until he got caught. i don't think he would have gotten caught again if they fought.He did climb past Nog in the rankings after the OWGP, though, and Nog was as solid at number 2 as Fedor was at number 1.
Definitely top 10 HW all time.
Mirko CroCop
28-10-2
![]()
![]()
Where do you rank CroCop's career? I have him just creasing the top 25 ever p4p and in the top 5 HW all-time. When at his peak in PRIDE he was one of the most feared strikers in the sport, period. May CroCop's legacy live on.[/QUOTE
Unranked. His career is completely unimpressive when you look at who he beat.
Igor Vovchanchyn had 66 MMA fights and was KO'd only once.
It took Mirko just over a minute to accomplish that feat. In his absolute prime (03-05) Mirko was as good a fighter as I've seen.
Unranked. His career is completely unimpressive when you look at who he beat.
Thats just silly, he lost 3 times in that span. He lost to Randleman who was a shell of his former self and then lost to Nog like 3 seconds after hitting the ground. How is that as good as the best fighter you've ever seen? You must not have seen Fedor, or Anderson, or GSP, or about 15-20 other guys.
Again, please stop. This sort of reasoning is very poor. Silva was also finished twice by much lesser opponents roughly at the same period and from what I can tell you have him as GOAT.
Just stop.
lol at unimpressive wins
If beating Barnett, Vovchanchyn, Herring, Coleman, Wanderlei and Sakuraba doesn't account for anything you probably haven't been watching MMA for very long. I think that's a pretty safe assumption to make.
Good day to troll, huh?
Thats just silly, he lost 3 times in that span. He lost to Randleman who was a shell of his former self and then lost to Nog like 3 seconds after hitting the ground. How is that as good as the best fighter you've ever seen? You must not have seen Fedor, or Anderson, or GSP, or about 15-20 other guys.
The only reason he wasn't #1 is due to having Fedor and Nog competing at their prime alongside him. Sort of like Malone/Stockton not having a ring.
he destroyed nog until it hit the ground. destroyed him. landed 8 liverkicks. what did nog land on him? nogs boxing is considered really good. trained for the brazilian team for the olympics or something like that...
he didn't land anything on cro cop. he was a human punching bag. his takedowns we garbage. if he didn't bumrush cro cop in the second as soon as the bell rang, chances are he wouldn't have gotten the takedown, or the win.
fedors opponents were the level as cro cops in pride. lots of tough fights mixed win with some cans to be crushed.
also, cro cop lost twice from 2003-2005. once to randleman who got lucky (and apparently was "shot" according to you) and once to fedor. so fuck off with that
not to mention he went on to make barnett look bad twice, something no one has ever done. anyone who wants to discredit cro cop needs to remember that. barnett has lost 6 times in almost 17 years. 3 times to cro cop.
Do you really not see how that makes sense?
The fighters from the same era declining at relatively the same time?
Really?