Created a MMA fight Picker GPT

In Jones vs Apinall, the AI does not appear to include the size difference as a factor.

Predicted Winner: Jon Jones
Expected Round: 3
Manner of Victory: Submission

Fight Analysis:
  1. Takedown Accuracy:
    • Tom Aspinall: 80/100 - Aspinall has shown proficiency in his takedown abilities, particularly leveraging his strength and agility.
    • Jon Jones: 95/100 - Jones' wrestling skills are among the best in MMA. His ability to execute takedowns against high-level opponents is exceptional.
  2. Strike Defense:
    • Tom Aspinall: 85/100 - Aspinall displays good striking defense, using his movement and reach effectively.
    • Jon Jones: 90/100 - Jones is known for his ability to avoid damage, utilizing his reach and unique fighting style to keep opponents at bay.
  3. Submission Attempts per Round:
    • Tom Aspinall: 75/100 - Aspinall, while primarily a striker, has shown competence in attempting submissions.
    • Jon Jones: 90/100 - Jones has a versatile submission game, often using his reach and leverage to secure submissions from unconventional positions.
  4. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Tom Aspinall: 80/100 - Aspinall has decent cardio, though there are some questions about his stamina in longer, grueling fights.
    • Jon Jones: 95/100 - Jones has consistently demonstrated the ability to maintain a high level of performance throughout long fights.
  5. Striking Accuracy:
    • Tom Aspinall: 85/100 - Aspinall is an accurate striker, particularly with his boxing skills.
    • Jon Jones: 90/100 - Jones' striking accuracy is excellent, often using a variety of strikes from different ranges to effectively hit his opponents.
  6. Fight IQ/Game Plan:
    • Tom Aspinall: 80/100 - Aspinall is intelligent in the cage, but he hasn't faced as many high-level opponents as Jones.
    • Jon Jones: 95/100 - Jones is known for his exceptional fight IQ, often outsmarting opponents and adapting his strategy mid-fight.
Total Metric Scores:
  • Tom Aspinall: 495/600
  • Jon Jones: 555/600
Conclusion:The analysis predicts a victory for Jon Jones, likely by submission in the 3rd round. Jones' superior wrestling, fight IQ, and submission skills are expected to give him the edge over Aspinall. While Aspinall's striking and athleticism make him a formidable opponent, Jones' experience and versatility in all aspects of MMA are likely to prevail in this matchup.
 
Disagreeing with this analysis (or more the conclusion) of Alex vs Ankalaev. It will be interesting to see how accurate it turns out to be.

Fight Analyst Advanced
Predicted Winner: Magomed Ankalaev
Expected Round: Round 3
Manner of Victory: TKO
Analysis:
  1. Takedown Accuracy:
    • Alex Pereira: 60/100. Pereira's background in kickboxing gives him a striking advantage, but his wrestling and takedown skills, while improving, are not his strongest suit.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 85/100. Ankalaev, with a background in combat sambo, has demonstrated high proficiency in takedowns, particularly against strikers.
  2. Strike Defense:
    • Alex Pereira: 75/100. Pereira has good striking defense, especially in his ability to manage distance and evade power shots.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 80/100. Ankalaev's defense is quite solid, showing good head movement and distance control, crucial against a striker like Pereira.
  3. Submission Attempts per Round:
    • Alex Pereira: 30/100. Submission is not Pereira's go-to strategy, given his striking-focused background.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 70/100. Ankalaev has the ability to execute submissions, but he tends to favor position control and ground-and-pound.
  4. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Alex Pereira: 80/100. Pereira has shown good cardio, especially in stand-up fights, but grappling exchanges could test his stamina.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 85/100. Ankalaev's stamina is well-tested in fights that involve both striking and wrestling, giving him a slight edge.
  5. Power Striking:
    • Alex Pereira: 90/100. Pereira’s striking power is exceptional, making him a constant knockout threat.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 75/100. While Ankalaev is a powerful striker, he might not match Pereira in terms of sheer knockout power.
  6. Fight IQ/Game Plan:
    • Alex Pereira: 75/100. Pereira's fight intelligence is evident in his striking approach but is less proven in mixed martial arts scenarios.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 85/100. Ankalaev shows high fight IQ, often adapting his strategy effectively against different opponents.
Total Metric Scores:
  • Alex Pereira: 410/600
  • Magomed Ankalaev: 480/600
Conclusion: The fight is expected to tilt in Ankalaev's favor primarily due to his superior wrestling, better-rounded skill set, and slightly higher fight IQ. While Pereira's striking power poses a significant threat, Ankalaev's ability to control the fight both on the feet and on the ground, combined with his solid strike defense, makes him the likely victor. The fight is anticipated to end in a TKO in the third round, as Ankalaev wears down Pereira with a mix of striking and grappling, eventually finding an opening to finish the fight.
Here it is with the Beta "Fight Boss" gpt:

Magomed Ankalaev vs. Alex Pereira
Prediction

  • Prediction Confidence: 70%
  • Winner: Magomed Ankalaev
  • Round: 3 (Normal Fight)
  • Victory Method (Via): Decision
Magomed Ankalaev
  • Record: 18-1
  • Age: 30
  • Experience: Skilled Contender
  • SLpM: 3.46
  • SAcc: 56%
  • TDD: 85%
  • KD: High
  • Clinching Time: Moderate
  • Leg Strike Volume and Accuracy: High
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Excellent
  • Counter Strike Accuracy: High
  • Head Movement: Very Good
  • TD Avg: 1.36
  • TAcc: 33%
  • Submission Attempts and Average per Minute: Low
  • Guard Pass and Retention Rates: Good
  • Submission Defense Rate: Excellent
  • Ground Control Time: Very High
  • Reach: 75 inches
  • Height and Weight Advantage: 6'3", strong for the division
  • Weight Cut: Well-managed
  • Fight Experience: High, against top-level competitors
  • Recent Fight Outcomes: Mostly victories, consistent performance
  • Opponent Analysis: Adapted well against diverse fighting styles
  • Fight Camp Quality: Excellent
  • Mental Toughness: Very High
  • Octagon Jitters: Minimal
  • Injury History: Minor
Alex Pereira
  • Record: 6-1
  • Age: 35
  • Experience: Striking Specialist
  • SLpM: 4.85
  • SAcc: 59%
  • TDD: 75%
  • KD: Very High
  • Clinching Time: Low
  • Leg Strike Volume and Accuracy: Very High
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Good
  • Counter Strike Accuracy: Exceptional
  • Head Movement: Moderate
  • TD Avg: 0.2
  • TAcc: 50%
  • Submission Attempts and Average per Minute: Very Low
  • Guard Pass and Retention Rates: Moderate
  • Submission Defense Rate: Moderate
  • Ground Control Time: Low
  • Reach: 79 inches
  • Height and Weight Advantage: 6'4", powerful striker
  • Weight Cut: Managed
  • Fight Experience: High in striking, moderate in MMA
  • Recent Fight Outcomes: Dominant victories in striking, adapting to MMA
  • Opponent Analysis: Faced more striking-oriented fighters
  • Fight Camp Quality: Good
  • Mental Toughness: High
  • Octagon Jitters: Possible in high-stakes MMA fights
  • Injury History: Not significant
**Detailed Scoring
on Comparable Metrics**
  • Striking: Pereira > Ankalaev
  • Grappling: Ankalaev > Pereira
  • Physical Attributes: Ankalaev ≈ Pereira
  • Fight IQ and Experience: Ankalaev > Pereira (in MMA context)
  • Cardio and Endurance: Ankalaev > Pereira
Final Thoughts on Prediction
This fight presents a classic striker vs. grappler matchup, with Pereira's striking prowess pitted against Ankalaev's grappling and well-rounded MMA skills. Pereira's striking, particularly his knockout power and accuracy, is formidable, but Ankalaev's ability to control the fight, especially with his grappling and ground control, might neutralize Pereira's primary weapons. Ankalaev's takedown defense and ground game could be the key factors, as they allow him to dictate where the fight takes place. While Pereira has a chance to end the fight with his striking, particularly if he can keep it standing, Ankalaev's overall MMA experience, ability to blend striking with wrestling, and superior cardio are likely to give him the edge in a decision victory. The fight could hinge on whether Pereira can land a significant strike before Ankalaev establishes control on the ground.
 
BETA "Fight Boss" prediction:
Jon Jones vs. Tom Aspinall

Prediction


  • Prediction Confidence: 80%
  • Winner: Jon Jones
  • Round: 5 (Main Event Fight)
  • Victory Method (Via): Decision
Jon Jones

  • Record: 26-1 (1 NC)
  • Age: 35
  • Experience: Elite Veteran
  • SLpM: 4.3
  • SAcc: 57%
  • TDD: 95%
  • KD: Moderate
  • Clinching Time: High
  • Leg Strike Volume and Accuracy: High
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Excellent
  • Counter Strike Accuracy: Exceptional
  • Head Movement: Excellent
  • TD Avg: 2.07
  • TAcc: 47%
  • Submission Attempts and Average per Minute: Moderate
  • Guard Pass and Retention Rates: Excellent
  • Submission Defense Rate: Excellent
  • Ground Control Time: Very High
  • Reach: 84.5 inches
  • Height and Weight Advantage: 6'4", significant reach advantage
  • Weight Cut: Well-managed
  • Fight Experience: Extremely High
  • Recent Fight Outcomes: Dominant, against top-tier opponents
  • Opponent Analysis: Exceptional against a variety of styles
  • Fight Camp Quality: Elite
  • Mental Toughness: Exceptional
  • Octagon Jitters: Unlikely
  • Injury History: Minimal
Tom Aspinall

  • Record: 12-2
  • Age: 29
  • Experience: Rising Contender
  • SLpM: 7.4
  • SAcc: 63%
  • TDD: 80%
  • KD: High
  • Clinching Time: Moderate
  • Leg Strike Volume and Accuracy: High
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Good
  • Counter Strike Accuracy: High
  • Head Movement: Good
  • TD Avg: 1.5
  • TAcc: 70%
  • Submission Attempts and Average per Minute: High
  • Guard Pass and Retention Rates: Good
  • Submission Defense Rate: Good
  • Ground Control Time: Moderate
  • Reach: 78 inches
  • Height and Weight Advantage: 6'5", but reach disadvantage
  • Weight Cut: Well-managed
  • Fight Experience: Moderate, increasing against higher-level opponents
  • Recent Fight Outcomes: Mostly victories, with recent momentum
  • Opponent Analysis: Less experienced against top-tier opponents
  • Fight Camp Quality: Good
  • Mental Toughness: High
  • Octagon Jitters: Possible in higher-profile fights
  • Injury History: Some concerns
Detailed Scoring on Comparable Metrics

  • Striking: Jones > Aspinall
  • Grappling: Jones > Aspinall
  • Physical Attributes: Jones > Aspinall
  • Fight IQ and Experience: Jones > Aspinall
  • Cardio and Endurance: Jones > Aspinall
Final Thoughts on Prediction
Jon Jones' unparalleled experience, fight IQ, and physical attributes give him a distinct advantage in this matchup. Aspinall is a formidable rising contender with impressive striking and grappling skills, but Jones' ability to adapt his fighting style to any opponent, coupled with his exceptional reach, wrestling, and ground control, likely leads to a decision victory for Jones. Aspinall's challenge will be to overcome Jones' reach and experience, finding opportunities to utilize his striking and submission skills. However, Jones' defensive skills, particularly in avoiding significant strikes and managing distance, might neutralize these threats. The fight could be competitive, but Jones' experience in five-round fights and his strategic approach will likely be the deciding factors.
 
Fun setup but GPT will rate each fight differently every different time. The data it will find won't be useful. So if you'd really want a functioning bot you'd need access to a lot of scraped data.
 
Fun setup but GPT will rate each fight differently every different time. The data it will find won't be useful. So if you'd really want a functioning bot you'd need access to a lot of scraped data.
I have seen some movement when including more data but it been pretty stable doing the same fight multiple times. I think as I keep tinkering I can get it more and more accurate. Your posts help!!
 
Created a MMA fight Picker GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-a4l5RVxni-fight-analyst-advanced

I gave it instructions to look at a fighters then compare then on a few different criteria and give them a weighted score from 1-100. I wouldn't use it to bet on fights or anything. Let me know what you think and if you have idea on how to expand it.
Did you just make this, or have you tested it by looking at how predictive it is in fight results?

I wonder if the analysis is partially swayed by seeing the data of places like the Sherdog Forums, lol
 
Here what's it saying for tonight's fights:
Predicted Winner: Magomed Ankalaev

Expected Round: Round 2

Manner of Victory: Knockout


Detailed Analysis:​

Magomed Ankalaev:​

  1. Weight Cut Amount: 85 - Ankalaev cuts a significant amount of weight but manages it professionally, indicating a high level of conditioning.
  2. Fighter Reach: 90 - With a long reach, Ankalaev can maintain distance and strike effectively.
  3. Training Center: 88 - Training at a top-level center, he receives excellent coaching and sparring opportunities.
  4. Natural Weight Class: Light Heavyweight - Score 95. His natural weight class aligns perfectly with his fighting category, giving him a natural advantage.
    Total Score: 358

Johnny Walker:​

  1. Weight Cut Amount: 78 - Walker cuts a substantial amount of weight but has shown signs of struggle in the past.
  2. Fighter Reach: 85 - Walker has a good reach, but not as advantageous as Ankalaev in striking exchanges.
  3. Training Center: 82 - Training at a reputable center, but slightly behind in terms of resources compared to Ankalaev’s training environment.
  4. Natural Weight Class: Light Heavyweight - Score 92. He is in his natural weight class but has not optimized his performance as well as Ankalaev.
    Total Score: 337

Conclusion:​

The data suggests that Magomed Ankalaev holds a significant advantage in reach and conditioning, with both fighters competing in their natural weight class. Ankalaev's superior training and weight management are likely to contribute to a knockout victory in the second round.
Interesting that it got the right outcome but it got the reach totally wrong. Walker has a 7" reach advantage. Ank was clearly having issues with that.
 
Did you just make this, or have you tested it by looking at how predictive it is in fight results?

I wonder if the analysis is partially swayed by seeing the data of places like the Sherdog Forums, lol
I have not joined a MMA match league to try it out yet. I still think I can make it better.
 
Interesting that it got the right outcome but it got the reach totally wrong. Walker has a 7" reach advantage. Ank was clearly having issues with that.
Great thanks. I'll have to figure our some logic to make sure it double checks it metrics. I have tried having it do it another way, but might need to adjust.
 
Here are the gpt's pick for UFC 297"
Predicted Winner: Dricus Du PlessisExpected Round: 4Manner of Victory: Submission

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Takedown Accuracy:
    • Sean Strickland: 68/100. Strickland's wrestling base is solid, but he often prefers to strike, using takedowns selectively. His accuracy is good when he chooses to engage in grappling.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 75/100. Du Plessis has a dynamic grappling approach with effective takedowns. His ability to adapt to opponents' movements and find openings for takedowns is notable.
  2. Strike Defense:
    • Sean Strickland: 82/100. Strickland has a high-level defensive striking game, using movement and guard effectively to mitigate incoming damage.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 79/100. Du Plessis has shown resilience in absorbing strikes but can occasionally be caught due to his aggressive offensive style.
  3. Submission Attempts per Round:
    • Sean Strickland: 30/100. Submissions are not a primary aspect of Strickland's strategy, as he tends to focus more on striking and control.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 85/100. Du Plessis is known for his submission skills, frequently looking for opportunities to finish fights on the ground.
  4. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Sean Strickland: 90/100. Strickland has exhibited excellent cardio, maintaining a consistent pace throughout his fights.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 88/100. Du Plessis also shows strong stamina, but his high-output style can sometimes lead to a slight decrease in energy in later rounds.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Sean Strickland: 270/400
  • Dricus Du Plessis: 327/400
Conclusion:Based on these metrics, Dricus Du Plessis holds the advantage, particularly in the realms of submission attempts and takedown accuracy. Strickland's striking defense and cardio are commendable, but Du Plessis' grappling and submission prowess, coupled with his own solid stamina, give him the edge. The fight is expected to be competitive in the initial rounds, with Du Plessis gradually imposing his grappling game. The prediction is for Du Plessis to secure a submission victory in the fourth round.

----

Predicted Winner: Raquel PenningtonExpected Round: Decision (5 Rounds)Manner of Victory: Unanimous Decision
Fight Analysis Metrics:
  1. Striking Accuracy:
    • Raquel Pennington: 64/100. Pennington has a methodical striking approach, focusing on accuracy over volume. She lands significant strikes with precision, especially in close-range exchanges.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 58/100. Silva's striking is potent, but she often sacrifices accuracy for power and volume, leading to lower overall striking precision.
  2. Grappling Control:
    • Raquel Pennington: 85/100. Pennington excels in grappling exchanges, showcasing strong control in clinch situations and on the ground. Her ability to maintain positions and apply pressure is a key strength.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 70/100. Silva is a competent grappler but sometimes struggles against more dominant wrestlers. She can maintain control but
often finds difficulty in reversing positions against high-caliber grapplers.
  1. Takedown Defense:
    • Raquel Pennington: 88/100. Pennington's takedown defense is robust, attributed to her solid base and awareness in grappling exchanges. She effectively neutralizes most takedown attempts.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 72/100. Silva has shown vulnerability to takedowns, especially against opponents with strong wrestling backgrounds. She often relies on her jiu-jitsu for defense, which can be a double-edged sword.
  2. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Raquel Pennington: 92/100. Pennington's endurance is one of her standout attributes. She maintains a consistent pace throughout the fight, rarely showing signs of fatigue.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 78/100. Silva's cardio is decent, but in prolonged exchanges and later rounds, she can exhibit signs of slowing down, affecting her performance.
  3. Fight IQ/Adaptability:
    • Raquel Pennington: 86/100. Pennington demonstrates high fight IQ, adapting her strategy as the fight progresses. She's skilled at reading her opponent and adjusting her approach accordingly.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 73/100. Silva shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but she can sometimes be predictable, particularly in her striking patterns and response to pressure.
Total Metric Scores:
  • Raquel Pennington: 415/500
  • Mayra Bueno Silva: 351/500
Conclusion:Raquel Pennington's advantages in grappling control, takedown defense, cardio, and fight IQ position her as the likely winner in this matchup. While Silva is a formidable opponent, Pennington's ability to control the pace and direction of the fight, combined with her consistent performance across rounds, suggests she will secure a unanimous decision victory after five rounds. Silva's striking power and jiu-jitsu skills pose a threat, but Pennington's overall skill set and adaptability give her the edge in this bout.


----

Predicted Winner: Neil MagnyExpected Round: 3Manner of Victory: TKO

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Striking Volume and Efficiency:
    • Neil Magny: 75/100. Magny is known for his high output in striking, often outworking opponents with volume. His reach advantage aids in landing strikes efficiently, though he sometimes lacks significant power.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott has good striking ability with more focus on power than volume. He's efficient in landing impactful strikes but may struggle with the pace set by a high-volume striker like Magny.
  2. Wrestling and Takedown Ability:
    • Neil Magny: 80/100. Magny's wrestling is a key aspect of his game, effectively blending takedowns with his striking. He's adept at controlling opponents on the ground.
    • Mike Malott: 65/100. Malott, while competent in wrestling, may find it challenging to match Magny's wrestling pedigree and experience, especially in defensive scenarios.
  3. Submission Skills:
    • Neil Magny: 60/100. Magny isn't primarily known for his submission skills but can capitalize on opportunities if they present themselves.
    • Mike Malott: 80/100. Malott is more proficient in submissions, posing a threat on the ground with his jiu-jitsu skills. If the fight goes to the ground, his submission acumen could be a decisive factor.
  4. Fight IQ and Adaptability:
    • Neil Magny: 85/100. Magny's experience against top-level competition has honed his fight IQ. He adapts well during fights, adjusting his strategy as needed.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but his experience against varied opponents at the highest level is more limited compared to Magny.
  5. Cardio and Stamina:
    • Neil Magny: 90/100. Magny's cardio is exceptional, often maintaining a high pace throughout his fights, which is a critical component of his fight strategy.
    • Mike Malott: 75/100. Malott has decent cardio but hasn't been tested as extensively in longer, grueling fights. Keeping up with Magny's pace could be challenging.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Neil Magny: 390/500
  • Mike Malott: 360/500
Conclusion:Neil Magny's advantages in striking volume, wrestling ability, fight IQ, and superior cardio make him the favored winner. His ability to maintain a high pace and volume in striking, coupled with effective wrestling, is likely to overwhelm Malott as the fight progresses. While Malott's power and submission skills are noteworthy, Magny's experience and adaptability are expected to steer the fight in his favor, leading to a TKO victory in the third round.
Im going to throw a small bet on all of these, if it works out in profit ill increase amounts!

Thanks for the work here, solid effort
 
Can you do a prediction for Joshua vs Ngannou?
Slobodan, where are from? And why did you ban Kenny Florian?
Im going to throw a small bet on all of these, if it works out in profit ill increase amounts!

Thanks for the work here, solid effort
I'm chucking those picks into a parlay for shits and giggles.
 
Could you do Wand vs Shogun if they had fought in the 05 Gran Prix?
 
Could you do Wand vs Shogun if they had fought in the 05 Gran Prix?

Prediction​

  • Confidence Percentage: 60%
  • Expected Winner: Wanderlei Silva
  • Round: 3
  • Victory Method: KO

Fighter Profiles​

Wanderlei Silva (2005)​

  • Record: 29-3-1, 1 NC (as of 2005)
  • Age: 29
  • Experience: Seasoned, dominant force in PRIDE FC
  • Strikes Landed per Minute (SLpM): Very High
  • Takedown Defense (TDD): Strong
  • Knockdowns (KD): Exceptional
  • Clinching Time: Extensive; often employs Muay Thai clinch
  • Leg Strike Volume: High
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Robust
  • Head Movement: Aggressive, sometimes to a fault
  • Reach Advantage: Neutral
  • Weight Cut: Intense but well-managed
  • Fight Experience: Rich, with victories over top fighters
  • Recent Outcomes: Dominant performances in recent fights
  • Opponent Analysis: Adapted and won against diverse fighting styles
  • Fight Camp Quality: Elite, with access to top training and sparring partners
  • Mental Toughness: Exceptionally high
  • Octagon Jitters: None, highly experienced
  • Injury History: Some concerns, but nothing major affecting performance

Maurício "Shogun" Rua (2005)​

  • Record: 12-2-0 (as of 2005)
  • Age: 23
  • Experience: Emerging talent, showing promise in PRIDE
  • Strikes Landed per Minute (SLpM): High
  • Takedown Defense (TDD): Good
  • Knockdowns (KD): High
  • Clinching Time: Moderate, prefers striking at range
  • Leg Strike Volume: Very High
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Good
  • Head Movement: Effective, but less tested against top-tier opponents
  • Reach Advantage: Slight
  • Weight Cut: Well-managed
  • Fight Experience: Growing, but less varied than Silva
  • Recent Outcomes: Rising trajectory with impressive finishes
  • Opponent Analysis: Strong performances, but fewer against elite fighters
  • Fight Camp Quality: High
  • Mental Toughness: Strong, but less proven under extreme pressure
  • Octagon Jitters: Minimal
  • Injury History: Relatively clean

Comparative Analysis​

  • Striking Power and Aggressiveness: Silva has a slight edge due to his proven track record against high-level opponents.
  • Technique and Precision: Rua shows great promise, but Silva’s experience and adaptability are key.
  • Physical Attributes: Similar, with Rua having a minor reach advantage.
  • Experience in Big Fights: Silva’s extensive experience in high-stakes fights gives him an edge.
  • Ground Game and Takedowns: Both have competent ground games, but this is likely to be a striking-focused battle.

Final Thoughts​

In this 2005 matchup, Silva’s experience and ferocious striking style are likely to be decisive factors. Rua, while exceptionally talented and on a rising trajectory, is facing a more seasoned and battle-hardened Silva. Expect an intense, striking-heavy contest with Silva exploiting his experience and power to secure a knockout victory.
 
Good job TS!

When you buy Amazon, Google and Microsoft, please hire me!
 
I have not joined a MMA match league to try it out yet. I still think I can make it better.
One thing I tried that I always do with other ChatGTP queries is to always instruct it to do a search for current info; this first came out as both having no martial arts experience. After I instructed it to make a search. it came back with the info about martial arts training. The result is pretty wacky and inaccurate, but to be fair, it doesn't have any fight data. Elon Musk has street fighting experience, lol


Fight Analyst Advanced

Revised Prediction​

  • Fighters: Mark Zuckerberg vs. Elon Musk
  • Prediction Confidence: Moderate
  • Expected Winner: Elon Musk
  • Round: 2
  • Victory Method: Decision

Fighter Profiles​

Mark Zuckerberg​

  • Record: 0-0 in professional MMA
  • Age: 39 (as of 2024)
  • Experience: Training in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, recent involvement in jiu-jitsu tournaments
  • Key Metrics: Physical fitness emphasized, but limited competitive experience

Elon Musk​

  • Record: 0-0 in professional MMA
  • Age: 52 (as of 2024)
  • Experience: Childhood training in judo, Kyokushin karate, and taekwondo; recent brief training in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu; street fight experience
  • Key Metrics: Physically robust with diverse martial arts background

Analysis​

Considering both have had some form of martial arts training, albeit at different levels and stages in life, this analysis incorporates their training, physical attributes, and mental toughness.
  1. Martial Arts Training and Skills:
    • Zuckerberg: Has been actively training in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and participating in tournaments. This suggests a more recent and consistent training regime in grappling.
    • Musk: Trained in judo, Kyokushin karate, and taekwondo during childhood, with some recent brief Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu training. His diverse martial arts background could give him an advantage in striking and grappling.
  2. Physical Attributes:
    • Both individuals have been involved in physical training, but their martial arts focus differs. Musk's height and build might offer him some advantage in striking and grappling exchanges.
  3. Mental Toughness and Fight IQ:
    • Both are known for their resilience and mental toughness in the business world. Translating this into a fight scenario could mean better stress management and strategic thinking during the fight.
  4. Real Fight Experience:
    • Musk has some street fight experience from his time growing up in South Africa, which could add to his practical fighting instincts.

Final Thoughts​

  • Elon Musk appears to have a slight edge due to his diverse martial arts background and physical attributes. However, the lack of recent and consistent combat sports competition for both individuals makes this a challenging and unpredictable matchup. Musk's advantage might come from his broader experience in martial arts and physical attributes, leading to a potential decision victory. However, Zuckerberg's recent and focused training in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu should not be underestimated.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top