Created a MMA fight Picker GPT

Damn, it's saying I have to upgrade from "free" to "premium" which is a paywall to view your MMA Fight Picker. Any chance you can make it free please?
 
Thanks guys. Let me know if you have more ideas of data I can try and pull to make it even more accurate.
 
TCE said:
Damn, it's saying I have to upgrade from "free" to "premium" which is a paywall to view your MMA Fight Picker. Any chance you can make it free please?
Click to expand...
I can't make it free, because its up to OpenAI. If you have a fight you want to see I can put it in and past results for you.
 
Slobodan said:
Can you do a prediction for Joshua vs Ngannou?
Click to expand...
This is the first Boxing one I have done:
Predicted Winner: Anthony JoshuaExpected Round: Round 8Manner of Victory: Technical Knockout

Fight Analysis:

  • Striking (Boxing Technique):
    • Joshua: 92
    • Ngannou: 75
      • Explanation: Joshua, with a professional boxing background, has a more refined and technical striking ability suited for boxing, giving him a distinct advantage in technique and precision.
  • Power:
    • Joshua: 90
    • Ngannou: 95
      • Explanation: While both are powerful strikers, Ngannou's knockout power is slightly more formidable, even in a boxing context.
  • Defense and Head Movement:
    • Joshua: 85
    • Ngannou: 70
      • Explanation: Joshua's boxing experience has honed his defensive skills, including head movement and guard, which are critical in a boxing match.
  • Footwork and Movement:
    • Joshua: 88
    • Ngannou: 70
      • Explanation: Joshua's footwork, a crucial aspect of boxing, is more advanced, allowing for better positioning and movement around the ring.
  • Stamina and Conditioning:
    • Joshua: 85
    • Ngannou: 75
      • Explanation: Joshua's conditioning for longer, 12-round boxing matches gives him an edge in stamina, especially in the later rounds.
  • Experience in Boxing:
    • Joshua: 95
    • Ngannou: 60
      • Explanation: Joshua's extensive experience in professional boxing, including fighting at the championship level, significantly outweighs Ngannou's experience in this specific sport.
  • Adaptability:
    • Joshua: 80
    • Ngannou: 70
      • Explanation: Joshua's adaptability within the boxing ring, to different styles and situations, is more proven given his boxing-focused career.
Total Score:

  • Joshua: 615
  • Ngannou: 515
Conclusion:In a boxing match, Anthony Joshua's superior technical skills, experience, and ringcraft are likely to prevail. His advantage in defensive skills, footwork, and boxing-specific stamina are key factors. While Ngannou's power poses a constant threat, Joshua's ability to navigate and control a boxing ring, coupled with his experience in longer matches, gives him the edge, leading to a predicted technical knockout in the later rounds.
 
Here are the gpt's pick for UFC 297"
Predicted Winner: Dricus Du PlessisExpected Round: 4Manner of Victory: Submission

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Takedown Accuracy:
    • Sean Strickland: 68/100. Strickland's wrestling base is solid, but he often prefers to strike, using takedowns selectively. His accuracy is good when he chooses to engage in grappling.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 75/100. Du Plessis has a dynamic grappling approach with effective takedowns. His ability to adapt to opponents' movements and find openings for takedowns is notable.
  2. Strike Defense:
    • Sean Strickland: 82/100. Strickland has a high-level defensive striking game, using movement and guard effectively to mitigate incoming damage.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 79/100. Du Plessis has shown resilience in absorbing strikes but can occasionally be caught due to his aggressive offensive style.
  3. Submission Attempts per Round:
    • Sean Strickland: 30/100. Submissions are not a primary aspect of Strickland's strategy, as he tends to focus more on striking and control.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 85/100. Du Plessis is known for his submission skills, frequently looking for opportunities to finish fights on the ground.
  4. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Sean Strickland: 90/100. Strickland has exhibited excellent cardio, maintaining a consistent pace throughout his fights.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 88/100. Du Plessis also shows strong stamina, but his high-output style can sometimes lead to a slight decrease in energy in later rounds.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Sean Strickland: 270/400
  • Dricus Du Plessis: 327/400
Conclusion:Based on these metrics, Dricus Du Plessis holds the advantage, particularly in the realms of submission attempts and takedown accuracy. Strickland's striking defense and cardio are commendable, but Du Plessis' grappling and submission prowess, coupled with his own solid stamina, give him the edge. The fight is expected to be competitive in the initial rounds, with Du Plessis gradually imposing his grappling game. The prediction is for Du Plessis to secure a submission victory in the fourth round.

----

Predicted Winner: Raquel PenningtonExpected Round: Decision (5 Rounds)Manner of Victory: Unanimous Decision
Fight Analysis Metrics:
  1. Striking Accuracy:
    • Raquel Pennington: 64/100. Pennington has a methodical striking approach, focusing on accuracy over volume. She lands significant strikes with precision, especially in close-range exchanges.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 58/100. Silva's striking is potent, but she often sacrifices accuracy for power and volume, leading to lower overall striking precision.
  2. Grappling Control:
    • Raquel Pennington: 85/100. Pennington excels in grappling exchanges, showcasing strong control in clinch situations and on the ground. Her ability to maintain positions and apply pressure is a key strength.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 70/100. Silva is a competent grappler but sometimes struggles against more dominant wrestlers. She can maintain control but
often finds difficulty in reversing positions against high-caliber grapplers.
  1. Takedown Defense:
    • Raquel Pennington: 88/100. Pennington's takedown defense is robust, attributed to her solid base and awareness in grappling exchanges. She effectively neutralizes most takedown attempts.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 72/100. Silva has shown vulnerability to takedowns, especially against opponents with strong wrestling backgrounds. She often relies on her jiu-jitsu for defense, which can be a double-edged sword.
  2. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Raquel Pennington: 92/100. Pennington's endurance is one of her standout attributes. She maintains a consistent pace throughout the fight, rarely showing signs of fatigue.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 78/100. Silva's cardio is decent, but in prolonged exchanges and later rounds, she can exhibit signs of slowing down, affecting her performance.
  3. Fight IQ/Adaptability:
    • Raquel Pennington: 86/100. Pennington demonstrates high fight IQ, adapting her strategy as the fight progresses. She's skilled at reading her opponent and adjusting her approach accordingly.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 73/100. Silva shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but she can sometimes be predictable, particularly in her striking patterns and response to pressure.
Total Metric Scores:
  • Raquel Pennington: 415/500
  • Mayra Bueno Silva: 351/500
Conclusion:Raquel Pennington's advantages in grappling control, takedown defense, cardio, and fight IQ position her as the likely winner in this matchup. While Silva is a formidable opponent, Pennington's ability to control the pace and direction of the fight, combined with her consistent performance across rounds, suggests she will secure a unanimous decision victory after five rounds. Silva's striking power and jiu-jitsu skills pose a threat, but Pennington's overall skill set and adaptability give her the edge in this bout.


----

Predicted Winner: Neil MagnyExpected Round: 3Manner of Victory: TKO

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Striking Volume and Efficiency:
    • Neil Magny: 75/100. Magny is known for his high output in striking, often outworking opponents with volume. His reach advantage aids in landing strikes efficiently, though he sometimes lacks significant power.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott has good striking ability with more focus on power than volume. He's efficient in landing impactful strikes but may struggle with the pace set by a high-volume striker like Magny.
  2. Wrestling and Takedown Ability:
    • Neil Magny: 80/100. Magny's wrestling is a key aspect of his game, effectively blending takedowns with his striking. He's adept at controlling opponents on the ground.
    • Mike Malott: 65/100. Malott, while competent in wrestling, may find it challenging to match Magny's wrestling pedigree and experience, especially in defensive scenarios.
  3. Submission Skills:
    • Neil Magny: 60/100. Magny isn't primarily known for his submission skills but can capitalize on opportunities if they present themselves.
    • Mike Malott: 80/100. Malott is more proficient in submissions, posing a threat on the ground with his jiu-jitsu skills. If the fight goes to the ground, his submission acumen could be a decisive factor.
  4. Fight IQ and Adaptability:
    • Neil Magny: 85/100. Magny's experience against top-level competition has honed his fight IQ. He adapts well during fights, adjusting his strategy as needed.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but his experience against varied opponents at the highest level is more limited compared to Magny.
  5. Cardio and Stamina:
    • Neil Magny: 90/100. Magny's cardio is exceptional, often maintaining a high pace throughout his fights, which is a critical component of his fight strategy.
    • Mike Malott: 75/100. Malott has decent cardio but hasn't been tested as extensively in longer, grueling fights. Keeping up with Magny's pace could be challenging.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Neil Magny: 390/500
  • Mike Malott: 360/500
Conclusion:Neil Magny's advantages in striking volume, wrestling ability, fight IQ, and superior cardio make him the favored winner. His ability to maintain a high pace and volume in striking, coupled with effective wrestling, is likely to overwhelm Malott as the fight progresses. While Malott's power and submission skills are noteworthy, Magny's experience and adaptability are expected to steer the fight in his favor, leading to a TKO victory in the third round.
 
TSaL said:
Here are the gpt's pick for UFC 297"
Predicted Winner: Dricus Du PlessisExpected Round: 4Manner of Victory: Submission

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Takedown Accuracy:
    • Sean Strickland: 68/100. Strickland's wrestling base is solid, but he often prefers to strike, using takedowns selectively. His accuracy is good when he chooses to engage in grappling.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 75/100. Du Plessis has a dynamic grappling approach with effective takedowns. His ability to adapt to opponents' movements and find openings for takedowns is notable.
  2. Strike Defense:
    • Sean Strickland: 82/100. Strickland has a high-level defensive striking game, using movement and guard effectively to mitigate incoming damage.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 79/100. Du Plessis has shown resilience in absorbing strikes but can occasionally be caught due to his aggressive offensive style.
  3. Submission Attempts per Round:
    • Sean Strickland: 30/100. Submissions are not a primary aspect of Strickland's strategy, as he tends to focus more on striking and control.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 85/100. Du Plessis is known for his submission skills, frequently looking for opportunities to finish fights on the ground.
  4. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Sean Strickland: 90/100. Strickland has exhibited excellent cardio, maintaining a consistent pace throughout his fights.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 88/100. Du Plessis also shows strong stamina, but his high-output style can sometimes lead to a slight decrease in energy in later rounds.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Sean Strickland: 270/400
  • Dricus Du Plessis: 327/400
Conclusion:Based on these metrics, Dricus Du Plessis holds the advantage, particularly in the realms of submission attempts and takedown accuracy. Strickland's striking defense and cardio are commendable, but Du Plessis' grappling and submission prowess, coupled with his own solid stamina, give him the edge. The fight is expected to be competitive in the initial rounds, with Du Plessis gradually imposing his grappling game. The prediction is for Du Plessis to secure a submission victory in the fourth round.

----

Predicted Winner: Raquel PenningtonExpected Round: Decision (5 Rounds)Manner of Victory: Unanimous Decision
Fight Analysis Metrics:
  1. Striking Accuracy:
    • Raquel Pennington: 64/100. Pennington has a methodical striking approach, focusing on accuracy over volume. She lands significant strikes with precision, especially in close-range exchanges.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 58/100. Silva's striking is potent, but she often sacrifices accuracy for power and volume, leading to lower overall striking precision.
  2. Grappling Control:
    • Raquel Pennington: 85/100. Pennington excels in grappling exchanges, showcasing strong control in clinch situations and on the ground. Her ability to maintain positions and apply pressure is a key strength.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 70/100. Silva is a competent grappler but sometimes struggles against more dominant wrestlers. She can maintain control but
often finds difficulty in reversing positions against high-caliber grapplers.
  1. Takedown Defense:
    • Raquel Pennington: 88/100. Pennington's takedown defense is robust, attributed to her solid base and awareness in grappling exchanges. She effectively neutralizes most takedown attempts.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 72/100. Silva has shown vulnerability to takedowns, especially against opponents with strong wrestling backgrounds. She often relies on her jiu-jitsu for defense, which can be a double-edged sword.
  2. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Raquel Pennington: 92/100. Pennington's endurance is one of her standout attributes. She maintains a consistent pace throughout the fight, rarely showing signs of fatigue.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 78/100. Silva's cardio is decent, but in prolonged exchanges and later rounds, she can exhibit signs of slowing down, affecting her performance.
  3. Fight IQ/Adaptability:
    • Raquel Pennington: 86/100. Pennington demonstrates high fight IQ, adapting her strategy as the fight progresses. She's skilled at reading her opponent and adjusting her approach accordingly.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 73/100. Silva shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but she can sometimes be predictable, particularly in her striking patterns and response to pressure.
Total Metric Scores:
  • Raquel Pennington: 415/500
  • Mayra Bueno Silva: 351/500
Conclusion:Raquel Pennington's advantages in grappling control, takedown defense, cardio, and fight IQ position her as the likely winner in this matchup. While Silva is a formidable opponent, Pennington's ability to control the pace and direction of the fight, combined with her consistent performance across rounds, suggests she will secure a unanimous decision victory after five rounds. Silva's striking power and jiu-jitsu skills pose a threat, but Pennington's overall skill set and adaptability give her the edge in this bout.


----

Predicted Winner: Neil MagnyExpected Round: 3Manner of Victory: TKO

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Striking Volume and Efficiency:
    • Neil Magny: 75/100. Magny is known for his high output in striking, often outworking opponents with volume. His reach advantage aids in landing strikes efficiently, though he sometimes lacks significant power.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott has good striking ability with more focus on power than volume. He's efficient in landing impactful strikes but may struggle with the pace set by a high-volume striker like Magny.
  2. Wrestling and Takedown Ability:
    • Neil Magny: 80/100. Magny's wrestling is a key aspect of his game, effectively blending takedowns with his striking. He's adept at controlling opponents on the ground.
    • Mike Malott: 65/100. Malott, while competent in wrestling, may find it challenging to match Magny's wrestling pedigree and experience, especially in defensive scenarios.
  3. Submission Skills:
    • Neil Magny: 60/100. Magny isn't primarily known for his submission skills but can capitalize on opportunities if they present themselves.
    • Mike Malott: 80/100. Malott is more proficient in submissions, posing a threat on the ground with his jiu-jitsu skills. If the fight goes to the ground, his submission acumen could be a decisive factor.
  4. Fight IQ and Adaptability:
    • Neil Magny: 85/100. Magny's experience against top-level competition has honed his fight IQ. He adapts well during fights, adjusting his strategy as needed.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but his experience against varied opponents at the highest level is more limited compared to Magny.
  5. Cardio and Stamina:
    • Neil Magny: 90/100. Magny's cardio is exceptional, often maintaining a high pace throughout his fights, which is a critical component of his fight strategy.
    • Mike Malott: 75/100. Malott has decent cardio but hasn't been tested as extensively in longer, grueling fights. Keeping up with Magny's pace could be challenging.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Neil Magny: 390/500
  • Mike Malott: 360/500
Conclusion:Neil Magny's advantages in striking volume, wrestling ability, fight IQ, and superior cardio make him the favored winner. His ability to maintain a high pace and volume in striking, coupled with effective wrestling, is likely to overwhelm Malott as the fight progresses. While Malott's power and submission skills are noteworthy, Magny's experience and adaptability are expected to steer the fight in his favor, leading to a TKO victory in the third round.
Click to expand...

These 3 are interesting because I have the complete opposite of the AI machine on all three.

Now, if the AI machine is correct on all 3, then fuck it, I'm gonna pay for plus, because I'm on a picking league where I can win money. This will be highly useful for me, and will make my life a lot easier than finding all the info myself.

Very good and handy tool, TS. Thanks. Feel free to post more fights.
 
TCE said:
These 3 are interesting because I have the complete opposite of the AI machine on all three.

Now, if the AI machine is correct on all 3, then fuck it, I'm gonna pay for plus, because I'm on a picking league where I can win money. This will be highly useful for me, and will make my life a lot easier than finding all the info myself.

Very good and handy tool, TS. Thanks. Feel free to post more fights.
Click to expand...
Roger, It will be interesting to see what happens at UFC 297. Good luck in your picks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCE
This is really cool TS

Perhaps you could have it look at the bookies odds aswell just as an additional input - might be tricky due to how they change based on bets coming in over time etc but if odds are heavily one sided it could be seen as a slight benefit to that fighter

Just some other ideas as aswell (no idea if it already factors any of these in based on what it finds)

Activity levels / time since last fight
Proneness to getting hurt/KOd (ie Hawes on last nights card)
Long losing/winning streak
Big discrepancy in ranking
Big discrepancy in age ( or age > 35 is a negative)

Maybe you could put some unrealistic matchups in to see what it picks up, a green fighter fresh off the contender series vs somebody in the top 5 of their weight class etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCE
bean88 said:
This is really cool TS

Perhaps you could have it look at the bookies odds aswell just as an additional input - might be tricky due to how they change based on bets coming in over time etc but if odds are heavily one sided it could be seen as a slight benefit to that fighter

Just some other ideas as aswell (no idea if it already factors any of these in based on what it finds)

Activity levels / time since last fight
Proneness to getting hurt/KOd (ie Hawes on last nights card)
Long losing/winning streak
Big discrepancy in ranking
Big discrepancy in age ( or age > 35 is a negative)

Maybe you could put some unrealistic matchups in to see what it picks up, a green fighter fresh off the contender series vs somebody in the top 5 of their weight class etc
Click to expand...
Some good ideas, It should be looking at record but I think weighting the age metric and time off metric might be interesting.

Here is a contender just signed first current champ:

Shin Haraguchi vs Islam Makhachev

Predicted Winner: Islam Makhachev
Expected Round: Round 3
Manner of Victory: Submission

Fighter Analysis:

  1. Shin Haraguchi:
    • Takedown Accuracy: 68/100. Haraguchi has demonstrated above-average takedown skills, particularly when using his speed to close distance. However, against a grappler of Makhachev's caliber, his effectiveness may be reduced.
    • Strike Defense: 72/100. Haraguchi's strike defense is decent, utilizing movement and distance management to evade strikes. This will be crucial against Makhachev's pressure.
    • Submission Attempts per Round: 40/100. Not heavily reliant on submissions, Haraguchi typically focuses more on striking and position control.
    • Cardio/Fight Stamina: 85/100. Haraguchi has shown the ability to maintain a high pace throughout fights, which will be essential in a bout against a pressure fighter like Makhachev.
  2. Islam Makhachev:
    • Takedown Accuracy: 92/100. Makhachev's wrestling is top-notch, with precise timing and control. He's likely to dominate in grappling exchanges.
    • Strike Defense: 80/100. His strike defense is robust, using head movement and guard effectively to mitigate damage while setting up his grappling.
    • Submission Attempts per Round: 75/100. Makhachev is known for his submission skills, especially when he gains dominant positions on the ground.
    • Cardio/Fight Stamina: 88/100. Makhachev maintains a consistent output and control, rarely showing signs of fatigue, which is critical in his grappling-heavy approach.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Shin Haraguchi: 265/400
  • Islam Makhachev: 335/400
Conclusion:Islam Makhachev's superior grappling and submission skills, combined with his effective strike defense, make him the likely winner. Makhachev's ability to control the pace and location of the fight, along with his endurance, gives him a significant advantage. Haraguchi's best chance lies in utilizing his strike defense and cardio to survive the early rounds and look for openings. However, the likelihood of Makhachev securing a dominant position and finishing with a submission by the third round is high.
 
TSaL said:
Here are the gpt's pick for UFC 297"
Predicted Winner: Dricus Du PlessisExpected Round: 4Manner of Victory: Submission

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Takedown Accuracy:
    • Sean Strickland: 68/100. Strickland's wrestling base is solid, but he often prefers to strike, using takedowns selectively. His accuracy is good when he chooses to engage in grappling.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 75/100. Du Plessis has a dynamic grappling approach with effective takedowns. His ability to adapt to opponents' movements and find openings for takedowns is notable.
  2. Strike Defense:
    • Sean Strickland: 82/100. Strickland has a high-level defensive striking game, using movement and guard effectively to mitigate incoming damage.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 79/100. Du Plessis has shown resilience in absorbing strikes but can occasionally be caught due to his aggressive offensive style.
  3. Submission Attempts per Round:
    • Sean Strickland: 30/100. Submissions are not a primary aspect of Strickland's strategy, as he tends to focus more on striking and control.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 85/100. Du Plessis is known for his submission skills, frequently looking for opportunities to finish fights on the ground.
  4. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Sean Strickland: 90/100. Strickland has exhibited excellent cardio, maintaining a consistent pace throughout his fights.
    • Dricus Du Plessis: 88/100. Du Plessis also shows strong stamina, but his high-output style can sometimes lead to a slight decrease in energy in later rounds.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Sean Strickland: 270/400
  • Dricus Du Plessis: 327/400
Conclusion:Based on these metrics, Dricus Du Plessis holds the advantage, particularly in the realms of submission attempts and takedown accuracy. Strickland's striking defense and cardio are commendable, but Du Plessis' grappling and submission prowess, coupled with his own solid stamina, give him the edge. The fight is expected to be competitive in the initial rounds, with Du Plessis gradually imposing his grappling game. The prediction is for Du Plessis to secure a submission victory in the fourth round.

----

Predicted Winner: Raquel PenningtonExpected Round: Decision (5 Rounds)Manner of Victory: Unanimous Decision
Fight Analysis Metrics:
  1. Striking Accuracy:
    • Raquel Pennington: 64/100. Pennington has a methodical striking approach, focusing on accuracy over volume. She lands significant strikes with precision, especially in close-range exchanges.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 58/100. Silva's striking is potent, but she often sacrifices accuracy for power and volume, leading to lower overall striking precision.
  2. Grappling Control:
    • Raquel Pennington: 85/100. Pennington excels in grappling exchanges, showcasing strong control in clinch situations and on the ground. Her ability to maintain positions and apply pressure is a key strength.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 70/100. Silva is a competent grappler but sometimes struggles against more dominant wrestlers. She can maintain control but
often finds difficulty in reversing positions against high-caliber grapplers.
  1. Takedown Defense:
    • Raquel Pennington: 88/100. Pennington's takedown defense is robust, attributed to her solid base and awareness in grappling exchanges. She effectively neutralizes most takedown attempts.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 72/100. Silva has shown vulnerability to takedowns, especially against opponents with strong wrestling backgrounds. She often relies on her jiu-jitsu for defense, which can be a double-edged sword.
  2. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Raquel Pennington: 92/100. Pennington's endurance is one of her standout attributes. She maintains a consistent pace throughout the fight, rarely showing signs of fatigue.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 78/100. Silva's cardio is decent, but in prolonged exchanges and later rounds, she can exhibit signs of slowing down, affecting her performance.
  3. Fight IQ/Adaptability:
    • Raquel Pennington: 86/100. Pennington demonstrates high fight IQ, adapting her strategy as the fight progresses. She's skilled at reading her opponent and adjusting her approach accordingly.
    • Mayra Bueno Silva: 73/100. Silva shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but she can sometimes be predictable, particularly in her striking patterns and response to pressure.
Total Metric Scores:
  • Raquel Pennington: 415/500
  • Mayra Bueno Silva: 351/500
Conclusion:Raquel Pennington's advantages in grappling control, takedown defense, cardio, and fight IQ position her as the likely winner in this matchup. While Silva is a formidable opponent, Pennington's ability to control the pace and direction of the fight, combined with her consistent performance across rounds, suggests she will secure a unanimous decision victory after five rounds. Silva's striking power and jiu-jitsu skills pose a threat, but Pennington's overall skill set and adaptability give her the edge in this bout.


----

Predicted Winner: Neil MagnyExpected Round: 3Manner of Victory: TKO

Fight Analysis Metrics:

  1. Striking Volume and Efficiency:
    • Neil Magny: 75/100. Magny is known for his high output in striking, often outworking opponents with volume. His reach advantage aids in landing strikes efficiently, though he sometimes lacks significant power.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott has good striking ability with more focus on power than volume. He's efficient in landing impactful strikes but may struggle with the pace set by a high-volume striker like Magny.
  2. Wrestling and Takedown Ability:
    • Neil Magny: 80/100. Magny's wrestling is a key aspect of his game, effectively blending takedowns with his striking. He's adept at controlling opponents on the ground.
    • Mike Malott: 65/100. Malott, while competent in wrestling, may find it challenging to match Magny's wrestling pedigree and experience, especially in defensive scenarios.
  3. Submission Skills:
    • Neil Magny: 60/100. Magny isn't primarily known for his submission skills but can capitalize on opportunities if they present themselves.
    • Mike Malott: 80/100. Malott is more proficient in submissions, posing a threat on the ground with his jiu-jitsu skills. If the fight goes to the ground, his submission acumen could be a decisive factor.
  4. Fight IQ and Adaptability:
    • Neil Magny: 85/100. Magny's experience against top-level competition has honed his fight IQ. He adapts well during fights, adjusting his strategy as needed.
    • Mike Malott: 70/100. Malott shows promise in adapting to different fighting styles, but his experience against varied opponents at the highest level is more limited compared to Magny.
  5. Cardio and Stamina:
    • Neil Magny: 90/100. Magny's cardio is exceptional, often maintaining a high pace throughout his fights, which is a critical component of his fight strategy.
    • Mike Malott: 75/100. Malott has decent cardio but hasn't been tested as extensively in longer, grueling fights. Keeping up with Magny's pace could be challenging.
Total Metric Scores:

  • Neil Magny: 390/500
  • Mike Malott: 360/500
Conclusion:Neil Magny's advantages in striking volume, wrestling ability, fight IQ, and superior cardio make him the favored winner. His ability to maintain a high pace and volume in striking, coupled with effective wrestling, is likely to overwhelm Malott as the fight progresses. While Malott's power and submission skills are noteworthy, Magny's experience and adaptability are expected to steer the fight in his favor, leading to a TKO victory in the third round.
Click to expand...
This is impressive.

The only issue is that it's purely logical. A lot of MMA is intuitive and ultimately, chaos. There's also a lot that goes Into the analysis of minds, psychology and other stuff.

That being said, this could still be very useful when taking all of this into account.

I could see myself using it as a tool.
 
You should ask Chat GPT how to improve Powerslap and how to market it as the biggest sport in the world. Maybe create and entrance theme for each contestant
 
AstralPanda said:
This is impressive.

The only issue is that it's purely logical. A lot of MMA is intuitive and ultimately, chaos. There's also a lot that goes Into the analysis of minds, psychology and other stuff.

That being said, this could still be very useful when taking all of this into account.

I could see myself using it as a tool.
Click to expand...
Thanks, your right about it being very unpredictable. I'm not sure the limit of data points I can add so I have a few other gpt's in progress to push it as far as I can to see the results.
 
ookii said:
You should ask Chat GPT how to improve Powerslap and how to market it as the biggest sport in the world. Maybe create and entrance theme for each contestant
Click to expand...
lol. Anyone could do that on Poe.com where you can pose this question to many different AI LLM's.
 
Here is a BETA gpt "Fight Boss" I'm working on. This one I'm trying to add as many metrics and data points it can find on each fighter. Theoretically it could go look at fighters social media posts and coaches posts to help "season" the results. Really anything that could impact a fight. is game.

Neil Magny vs. Mike Malott

Prediction

  • Prediction Confidence: 75%
  • Winner: Neil Magny
  • Round: 3 (Normal Fight)
  • Victory Method (Via): Decision
Neil Magny

  • Record: 26-9
  • Age: 35
  • Experience: Veteran
  • SLpM (Significant Strikes Landed per Minute): 3.96
  • SAcc (Striking Accuracy): 47%
  • TDD (Takedown Defense): 58%
  • KD (Knockdowns): Moderate
  • Clinching Time: High
  • Leg Strike Volume and Accuracy: Moderate
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Good
  • Counter Strike Accuracy: High
  • Head Movement: Excellent
  • TD Avg (Takedowns Average per 15 min): 2.4
  • TAcc (Takedown Accuracy): 43%
  • Submission Attempts and Average per Minute: Low
  • Guard Pass and Retention Rates: Good
  • Submission Defense Rate: Excellent
  • Ground Control Time: High
  • Reach: 80 inches
  • Height and Weight Advantage: 6'3", often has reach advantage
  • Weight Cut: Well-managed
  • Fight Experience: High
  • Recent Fight Outcomes: Mixed, facing high-level competition
  • Opponent Analysis: Experienced against versatile fighters
  • Fight Camp Quality: Excellent
  • Mental Toughness: High
  • Octagon Jitters: Unlikely
  • Injury History: Some issues in the past
Mike Malott

  • Record: 8-1-1
  • Age: 30
  • Experience: Rising Contender
  • SLpM: 4.12
  • SAcc: 52%
  • TDD: 66%
  • KD: High
  • Clinching Time: Moderate
  • Leg Strike Volume and Accuracy: High
  • Knockout Recovery Rate: Unknown
  • Counter Strike Accuracy: Moderate
  • Head Movement: Good
  • TD Avg: 1.8
  • TAcc: 50%
  • Submission Attempts and Average per Minute: High
  • Guard Pass and Retention Rates: Moderate
  • Submission Defense Rate: Good
  • Ground Control Time: Moderate
  • Reach: 73 inches
  • Height and Weight Advantage: 6'0", typically at a reach disadvantage
  • Weight Cut: Well-managed
  • Fight Experience: Moderate
  • Recent Fight Outcomes: Mostly victories in lower-tier competitions
  • Opponent Analysis: Less experienced against high-caliber opponents
  • Fight Camp Quality: Good
  • Mental Toughness: Good
  • Octagon Jitters: Possible in higher-profile fights
  • Injury History: Minor
Detailed Scoring on Comparable Metrics

  • Striking: Magny > Malott
  • Grappling: Magny ≈ Malott
  • Physical Attributes: Magny > Malott
  • Fight IQ and Experience: Magny > Malott
  • Cardio and Endurance: Magny > Malott
Final Thoughts on Prediction
Neil Magny's experience, reach advantage, and striking versatility give him a significant edge in this matchup. Mike Malott is a rising talent with impressive striking and submission skills, but Magny's ability to control the distance and pace, coupled with his octagon experience against top-tier opponents, likely leads to a decision victory for Magny. Malott's challenge will be to close the distance and utilize his grappling and submission skills, but Magny's takedown defense and clinch control might neutralize these threats.
 
Well, I’ll be damned. A white belt thread that is actually awesome. Good job TS!
Now, what we need is a Pereira - Ankalaev prediction.

And, just to be done with it, the fight everyone wants to see but will never happen Jones - Aspinall.
 
Disagreeing with this analysis (or more the conclusion) of Alex vs Ankalaev. It will be interesting to see how accurate it turns out to be.

Fight Analyst Advanced
Predicted Winner: Magomed Ankalaev
Expected Round: Round 3
Manner of Victory: TKO
Analysis:
  1. Takedown Accuracy:
    • Alex Pereira: 60/100. Pereira's background in kickboxing gives him a striking advantage, but his wrestling and takedown skills, while improving, are not his strongest suit.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 85/100. Ankalaev, with a background in combat sambo, has demonstrated high proficiency in takedowns, particularly against strikers.
  2. Strike Defense:
    • Alex Pereira: 75/100. Pereira has good striking defense, especially in his ability to manage distance and evade power shots.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 80/100. Ankalaev's defense is quite solid, showing good head movement and distance control, crucial against a striker like Pereira.
  3. Submission Attempts per Round:
    • Alex Pereira: 30/100. Submission is not Pereira's go-to strategy, given his striking-focused background.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 70/100. Ankalaev has the ability to execute submissions, but he tends to favor position control and ground-and-pound.
  4. Cardio/Fight Stamina:
    • Alex Pereira: 80/100. Pereira has shown good cardio, especially in stand-up fights, but grappling exchanges could test his stamina.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 85/100. Ankalaev's stamina is well-tested in fights that involve both striking and wrestling, giving him a slight edge.
  5. Power Striking:
    • Alex Pereira: 90/100. Pereira’s striking power is exceptional, making him a constant knockout threat.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 75/100. While Ankalaev is a powerful striker, he might not match Pereira in terms of sheer knockout power.
  6. Fight IQ/Game Plan:
    • Alex Pereira: 75/100. Pereira's fight intelligence is evident in his striking approach but is less proven in mixed martial arts scenarios.
    • Magomed Ankalaev: 85/100. Ankalaev shows high fight IQ, often adapting his strategy effectively against different opponents.
Total Metric Scores:
  • Alex Pereira: 410/600
  • Magomed Ankalaev: 480/600
Conclusion: The fight is expected to tilt in Ankalaev's favor primarily due to his superior wrestling, better-rounded skill set, and slightly higher fight IQ. While Pereira's striking power poses a significant threat, Ankalaev's ability to control the fight both on the feet and on the ground, combined with his solid strike defense, makes him the likely victor. The fight is anticipated to end in a TKO in the third round, as Ankalaev wears down Pereira with a mix of striking and grappling, eventually finding an opening to finish the fight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,266,709
Messages
57,420,829
Members
175,700
Latest member
xojeny

Share this page

Back
Top