If hypothetically you had a special ring that would cause the virus to light up everywhere in your immediate local environs would you put it on?
Or would you just prefer to not know.
I personally am kind of torn on that. I think I would just prefer not to know. Now if I had any elderly that I had to be around (I don't at the moment) I would definitely wear the ring but otherwise I wouldn't wear the ring.
Bloomberg immediately had a story about how that drug can kill you after Trump said that. Imagine spreading fear like that out of spite.CDC approves the drug trump touted.
Naturally, liberals seeth.
You mean the FDA.CDC approves the drug trump touted.
Naturally, liberals seeth.
CDC approves the drug trump touted.
Naturally, liberals seeth.
fuck yeah man, ratings is the only thing that matters (+ those sweet sweet liberal tears)
the more dead/hospitalized the higher the ratings - hopefully at the peak of this democratic hoax flu we have even higher ratings! that will show those in the moronic left who is in charge - surely not some pansy afraid of killing several thousand of his fellow americans for tv ratings
lol these dudes are trying to dox people on a karate forum but they want to cry about civility.Lol at liberals suddenly pretending they care about their 'fellow Americans.' That must he why you spend al your time online viciously attacking them for having a different opinion than you.
Respect is earned over time. And you have to give respect to get respect.
You can't treat everyone else like shit and then turn around and be outraged when they disrespect you.
lol these dudes are trying to dox people on a karate forum but they want to cry about civility.
one shitty media down
It's not taxable, but if your 2020 income exceeds the threshold you will have to pay some or all of it back.So I am pretty ignorant to this stimulus check and how it works. So if you get the $1,200, does that mean on next years tax return it will be $1,200 less? Or is this $1,200 more a less a free $1,200 no strings attached?
Fox News reportedly fears its early downplaying of COVID-19 leaves it open to lawsuits
In early March, "Fox News tried to do their original playbook, which was dismiss it as a hoax, say that this is another partisan attempt by Democrats to hurt Donald Trump, and this was the case where they could not prevent reality,"
When I've been talking to Fox insiders over the last few days, there's a real concern inside the network that their early downplaying of the coronavirus actually exposes Fox News to potential legal action by viewers who maybe were misled and actually have died from this. I've heard Trish Regan's being taken off the air is, you know, reflective of this concern that Fox News is in big trouble by downplaying this virus. ...
one shitty media down
So as an example, if your 2020 income means that you would have received a $1k check instead of the $1,200 check you did get, you would pay back $200?It's not taxable, but if your 2020 income exceeds the threshold you will have to pay some or all of it back.
literally every outlet had times where it downplayed the virusFox News reportedly fears its early downplaying of COVID-19 leaves it open to lawsuits
In early March, "Fox News tried to do their original playbook, which was dismiss it as a hoax, say that this is another partisan attempt by Democrats to hurt Donald Trump, and this was the case where they could not prevent reality,"
When I've been talking to Fox insiders over the last few days, there's a real concern inside the network that their early downplaying of the coronavirus actually exposes Fox News to potential legal action by viewers who maybe were misled and actually have died from this. I've heard Trish Regan's being taken off the air is, you know, reflective of this concern that Fox News is in big trouble by downplaying this virus. ...
one shitty media down