Law Coronavirus the US GOV'T Response analysis Thread v2

But the things they did you'd be calling communism like isolation, tracing, wearing a mask so then how do you suggest we handle it with minimal loss of life? They didn't shut down the whole economy but they did have very strict isolation for those who were at risk or infected.

I don't think there is any easy way out because Americans will call any kind of rule communism and therefore it will only prolong this thing. Americans just don't like rules even if it benefits society as a whole.

You go out lately? Damn near everyone is wearing a mask.

But honestly, the healthy should just go about their business. This virus is not going away and the more healthy people that get it the better.

That way we fuck the second wave in the ass. But having healthy people hide under their beds just guarantees a horrible second wave
 
You go out lately? Damn near everyone is wearing a mask.

But honestly, the healthy should just go about their business. This virus is not going away and the more healthy people that get it the better.

That way we fuck the second wave in the ass. But having healthy people hide under their beds just guarantees a horrible second wave

<Huh2><Huh2><Huh2><Huh2><Huh2>
 
You go out lately? Damn near everyone is wearing a mask.

But honestly, the healthy should just go about their business. This virus is not going away and the more healthy people that get it the better.

That way we fuck the second wave in the ass. But having healthy people hide under their beds just guarantees a horrible second wave

So what you're saying is......

575e755a7681256d104a215f8c2ee784.jpg
 
Someone doesn't understand how healthy immune systems work...

That would be you, the just a flu bro who was claiming the mortality for covid wasn't shit.

It's quite better to keep people healthy as possible while creating a vaccine. I don't expect a Trump fan to understand the idea of capable action, however.

Good of you, completely failing to address yet another piece of information I brought for you to read.
 
That would be you, the just a flu bro who was claiming the mortality for covid wasn't shit.

It's quite better to keep people healthy as possible while creating a vaccine. I don't expect a Trump fan to understand the idea of capable action, however.

Good of you, completely failing to address yet another piece of information I brought for you to read.

Creating a vaccine? When has there ever been a vaccine created for a Coronavirus?

You are going to be waiting a long time inside, mask bro.
 
It's quite better to keep people healthy as possible while creating a vaccine.

LOL @ you waiting for some miracle vaccine to eliminate this virus. They've had how long with the regular old flu? Oh', but they're gonna get this thing under wraps in a few months...

You're such a stooge.

At some point, you're gonna have to come out from under your blanky and just deal with it, buttercup. Fact is, the human immune system can in fact deal with it, much like the flu. It's killing those with weaker immune systems, much like the flu. You'll eventually just have to take some over the counter meds to deal with it...much like the flu.
 
LOL @ you waiting for some miracle vaccine to eliminate this virus. They've had how long with the regular old flu? Oh', but they're gonna get this thing under wraps in a few months...

You're such a stooge.

At some point, you're gonna have to come out from under your blanky and just deal with it, buttercup. Fact is, the human immune system can in fact deal with it, much like the flu. It's killing those with weaker immune systems, much like the flu. You'll eventually just have to take some over the counter meds to deal with it...much like the flu.

Ok, so you're not going to address the implications of removing funding for that team, and are just doing the flu bro routine again. Cool. Saves me the time of further "discussion" with you.

"That's funny, considering it's mortality rate is far lower.

You do know that that influenza's numbers DWARF the Coronavirus right?

Stay afraid though, sheep"
 
Ok, so you're not going to address the implications of removing funding for that team, and are just doing the flu bro routine again. Cool. Saves me the time of further "discussion" with you.

"That's funny, considering it's mortality rate is far lower.

You do know that that influenza's numbers DWARF the Coronavirus right?

Stay afraid though, sheep"

Notice how you have no rebuttal...

Stay afraid, sheep.
 
Notice how you have no rebuttal...

Stay afraid, sheep.

Rebuttal to what? You've yet to make a single cogent point in the entire time these Covid threads have been about, save the flu bro shit that is laid waste by the simple infection and death numbers you incorrectly assessed, and continue to do so.
 
Rebuttal to what? You've yet to make a single cogent point in the entire time these Covid threads have been about, save the flu bro shit that is laid waste by the simple infection and death numbers you incorrectly assessed, and continue to do so.

Let me ask you this, when will you feel safe enough to get back to normal? All of your posts suggest it's when a fantastical vaccine is created that eliminates the virus completely, and nobody, literally NOBODY, can die from it.

Is that about right? If not, please lay out your idea when it will be fine to get back out there.

I await your deflection.
 
Let me ask you this, when will you feel safe enough to get back to normal? All of your posts suggest it's when a fantastical vaccine is created that eliminates the virus completely, and nobody, literally NOBODY, can die from it.

Is that about right? If not, please lay out your idea when it will be fine to get back out there.

I will trust the advice of the preeminent health experts, not Trump, Pence or people with zero qualifications, much less idiots who say it's just like the flu in it's affects.Nobody but you weirdos and the President have been talking about miracles and miracle cures. Shit-tier projection there.

It'd be nice if you'd read the articles you dismiss off hand. Your critiques always show you never read even the first couple paragraphs. Maybe that's why you've consistently bitched out of info brought to you, like the detailing of the Air Bridge corruption, the admin refusing the manufacture of millions of masks months ago, the staggering ineptitude Dr. Bright's whistleblower complaint detailed, the president pushing a malaria drug (which all of you conveniently shut the fuck up about, odd), or having the FBI, FEMA and HHS steal medical supplies from states who used taxpayer dollars to pay for said supplies a second time.

Silent on all of that, but hey, you've got a great "critique" with this "Bitch, we don't need a vaccine, ain't even gotta worry about it!!" argument to add to the flu bro stuff.
 
I await your deflection.

...

I will trust the advice of the preeminent health experts, not Trump, Pence or people with zero qualifications, much less idiots who say it's just like the flu in it's affects.Nobody but you weirdos and the President have been talking about miracles and miracle cures. Shit-tier projection there.

It'd be nice if you'd read the articles you dismiss off hand. Your critiques always show you never read even the first couple paragraphs. Maybe that's why you've consistently bitched out of info brought to you, like the detailing of the Air Bridge corruption, the admin refusing the manufacture of millions of masks months ago, the staggering ineptitude Dr. Bright's whistleblower complaint detailed, the president pushing a malaria drug (which all of you conveniently shut the fuck up about, odd), or having the FBI, FEMA and HHS steal medical supplies from states who used taxpayer dollars to pay for said supplies a second time.

Silent on all of that, but hey, you've got a great "critique" with this "Bitch, we don't need a vaccine, ain't even gotta worry about it!!" argument to add to the flu bro stuff.

<WellThere>
 

Do you have any idea or argument for the removal of a scientist and his team, who have already made breakthroughs regarding the disease, who are working on a vaccine, having their funding removed due to the President's blaming of China?

Any actual critique or argument, save the hyperbolic crap about me wanting everything perfect, or whatever you're trying to say with that?

Anything on topic? This thread is about the US Government's response, after all.....
 
Do you have any idea or argument for the removal of a scientist and his team, who have already made breakthroughs regarding the disease, who are working on a vaccine, having their funding removed due to the President's blaming of China?

Any actual critique or argument, save the hyperbolic crap about me wanting everything perfect, or whatever you're trying to say with that?

Anything on topic? This thread is about the US Government's response, after all.....

Deflection +

Answer the question, or continue being humiliated. The choice is yours.
 
Deflection +

Answer the question, or continue being humiliated. The choice is yours.
He's kinda got a point though. You do have a tendancy to run from arguments that show data and instead parrot Trumps latest talking points. You aren't look very good here
 
Deflection +

Answer the question, or continue being humiliated. The choice is yours.

Your question, which I already answered, does not at all reflect my position, or the position of anyone else I've seen. It's mere hyperbolic nonsense you're projecting forth and making into my position, dishonestly so.

Again, on topic, do you have a problem with a key researcher on this virus having his team's funding removed at such a critical time by the White House? What arguments to could you possibly have to support such an inept action?

What about the Bright whistleblower complaint, or any of the myriad actions by this admin that you've conveniently bitched out of arguing for?

He's kinda got a point though. You do have a tendancy to run from arguments that show data and instead parrot Trumps latest talking points. You aren't look very good here

I already addressed his asinine question too.....
 
He's kinda got a point though. You do have a tendancy to run from arguments that show data and instead parrot Trumps latest talking points. You aren't look very good here

When do you think it is okay to get back to normal? When a government person you like says so?

No sheep. No sheep at all...
 
Your question, which I already answered, does not at all reflect my position, or the position of anyone else I've seen. It's mere hyperbolic nonsense you're projecting forth and making into my position, dishonestly so.

Again, on topic, do you have a problem with a key researcher on this virus having his team's funding removed at such a critical time by the White House? What arguments to could you possibly have to support such an inept action?

What about the Bright whistleblower complaint, or any of the myriad actions by this admin that you've conveniently bitched out of arguing for?



I already addressed his asinine question too.....

I will ask one more time. When do YOU think it will be fine to get back out there? If you're answer is "When someone other than poopy head Trump, or anyone in poopy head Trump's administration tells me so", you've only proven my point.
 
When do you think it is okay to get back to normal? When a government person you like says so?

No sheep. No sheep at all...
When we don't have tens of thousands of cases a day? You already know my stance. We fucked up from the beginning by allowing all these non essential stores stay open. We needed fast testing early and competent leadership. Not someone saying it will magically go away when he's been given information in January about the virus
 
Back
Top