JOSHUAACE. He was a world class cunt and in my hall of fame for being such an arrogant, condescending, and insufferable twat waffle. That thread got quite heated. I was super confident that grayson was going down and ace was overconfident that he would walk. I used scotus case law that specifically relate to use of force (graham v connor and Johnson v flock) and deadly use of force (TN v Garner) and imo, mopped the floor with him so badly that he left sherdog-or blocked me because I wasn’t able to tag him to drag his bitch ass in here and rub his face in it.
Oh, and he claimed he was a renowned defense attorney as well lol. After you read this, do me a favor and see if you can tag him and let him know that he was dead wrong as I said and he can eat a bag of dicks-just in case he hasn’t been running and instead just blocked me because I mopped the floor with him.
In fact, he wanted to bet accounts-loser leaves sherdog forever. Despite my confidence in my assessment, I don’t gamble for any reason. I hate gambling-I don’t do scratch offs or lottery, don’t play slots, sports gambling, etc and I hate it even more now because my YouTube feed commercials were ALL sports betting-betmgm, sportsbook, bitcoin and bitcoin experts that want to teach you to be a millionaire, and other predatory cunts and many of the commercials-you can’t skip. And I was bit especially hard because I watch tons of mma channels, fishing videos (again, a sport-so I must like gambling) and call of duty threads-so again, I would probably like online gambling. I also watch a metric ton of Cenozoic mega fauna video (giant mammals from millions of years ago) and despite how much I hate those commercials, I am not springing for YouTube plus to avoid them-so a few weeks ago, after developing an extremely unhealthy hatred for jon hamm and kevin hart because they’re in every commercial, I looked up how to block gambling ads.
The second reason I wouldn’t bet my 20 year old account was that I have seen the justice system fail over and over again. I have personally seen a jury vote to acquit a career violent felon for felony domestic battery because they didn’t like the victim. She was a pregnant crack whore that her pimp beat with a bicycle. She had a perjury charge-convicted of lying in a court of law, which the defense tried to play up-but it never ever should have mattered because I actually saw the incident taking place. I was on patrol in the ghetto and saw a crowd formed at the entrance of an alley known for drug dealing. There were probably about 20 people. We tried to turn down the alley and we heard people screaming “5-0!!” And no one would Move out of the way-they were purposely blocking the road and warning him that we were there. I took note of who wouldn’t move and I got each of them in my own way when they maybe would have normally gotten the occasional break-not anymore.
Anyway, I was able to see through the crowd that there was a woman on the ground and her bf and pimp was holding a bicycle over his head and he kept bringing it down on her legs. We had to race at high speed to the next alley and when we got there, the bike was on the ground, he was trying to pretend like he was walking away-and he said “the dumb bitch is high and falling down again.” I immediately arrested him-thankfully, he tried to resist and I slammed his face onto the hot cruiser’s trunk that had been baking in the summer sun. We took her to the hospital-again, she was pregnant, and she had bike wheel marks up and down her legs and had a bloody lip and nose-I don’t see him hit her in the face. I testified as to what I saw-him physically hit her with a bike tire, then testified that I know them to be intimate partners, and finally, that upon checking his triple I history (an fbi record of every time you ever got arrested and fingerprinted by law enforcement and it has the dispositions that tell you outcomes, court case numbers, and sentence). It differs from a criminal background d check that only shows what you were convicted of-not the court case numbers and dates-which are required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person in question has had more than 2 previous domestic violence convictions because the third is a felony. This incident put him in the violent habitual offender category and he could have gone away for a long time and he was an absolute asshole every time you dealt with him so it made me happy to know (or believe it would happen) that he was going away for a long time.
Anyway, the jury voted to acquit. I was crushed. Again, I saw it-I saw him beating her with a bike and her perjury conviction didn’t fucking matter.
I knew one of the jurors-roberta. Her father owned the biggest, most profitable car dealership in the area and they were millionaires. She was the VP. She was also married to a former cop who was known to be an incompetent and notoriously lazy coward that went back to school and became an incredibly lazy prosecutor-which should have prevented her from being on the jury in the first place-but her coming from money and influence, she really wanted to be on that jury because it would be fun and interesting: I remember the voir dire (when prosecution and defense question potential jurors to determine whom they want to strike) and I remember one of them asking her despite her husband, could she remain unbiased and she said “on her honor as a mother of two kids.”
Anyway, she always wanted law enforcement business and offered what they called “friends and family benefits” to all law enforcement officers and they had been trying to get a contract with the city to ensure we bought our police cruisers through them. I made an absolute stink over it-telling anyone I could to not buy cars from them. I told friends, other officers, other police departments in the area-again, I was a bear scorned. Well, one of my former partners whom I had never liked (he was a compulsive gambler and when I was a rookie, he would park at the 7-11 and do scratch offs for most of the shift and wouldn’t let me drive and wouldn’t let me get into any action because he was a lazy pos) is really good friends with her. He comes up to me one day and tells me I need to cool it with smearing Roberta’s name all over town.
First, he says that she is good to law enforcement and respects officers more than just about anyone in the city. So I tell him that she was on a jury that unanimously voted to acquit a known violent offender and woman beater as well as being a crack dealer and he had a manslaughter conviction in his past for killing someone and they let him walk. He then says he’s going to level with me-she really really wanted to convict him and so did some of the other jurors, but there was one guy that said “she’s a crack whore and pregnant-fuck her” he mentions that according to roberta, this juror kept railing on about how she smokes cigarettes, drinks alcohol, smokes crack, and sells her body all while carrying a baby which will never have a chance in life. And that is one million percent valid-she was a piece of shit. She was destroying the human baby inside of her with poison and it would never ever be raised by its own mother-thank god, and it would fail to thrive due to health issues associated with smoking crack in utero and health issues associated with drinking and smoking while pregnant. That poor kid didn’t stand a chance in life just based on those health issues that affect how the brain develops and it is proven that such exposure to those particular chemicals stunt growth and have life-long effects. So, yes absolutely, I get it. In fact, she pissed me off to see her hooking on the streets and smoking and drinking and I actually arrested her quite a few times hoping that she would get locked up and the baby-poisoning would cease while she was in lock up, but she kept getting out-bailed out my her pump because a pregnant crack whore is a kink for some people and they paid good money for her.
So my old partner, Dave, is really trying to get me to understand that she didn’t have a chance because that other juror was really the bad guy-not her. I told him that I absolutely don’t give a fuck and that by voting to acquit-she and the other jurors not only allowed a violent criminal to walk on a potential 10+ year stretch-that they allowed a man to beat a pregnant woman without consequences that could have actually killed that baby-that she and the other jurors could have not simply gone along with one piece of shit that condoned the behavior because she was a bad person and not fit to be a mother, but they did so for less than an hour.
That’s how long they deliberated-less than an hour for them to completely dismiss my testimony and the work I put in and the hour I put on the stand being questioned by some sleazy defense attorney who vigorously defended this man and was also, like ace, a condescending cunt.
So that’s why I don’t trust the court system enough to gamble my account.
Again, let me know if you can tag him because I can’t.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...ed-for-assistance-in-her-home.4337082/page-40
