- Joined
- Aug 26, 2014
- Messages
- 14,033
- Reaction score
- 1
Posted on Psychological Science, A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes
Lower Cognitive Ability Predicts Greater Prejudice Through Right-Wing Ideology and Low Intergroup Contact
To many of us this is no surprise. It seems every politician and private citizen we know that is completely ignorant or in denial of very real scientific facts find themselves on the right.
To the rest of you, especially conservatives, what do you have to say about this? Are there any broader implications to be made from it?
What was hilarious to me and extremely ironic is that when I posted an article from psychology today that was citing this study to talk about the issue; several very dim right wingers I know came in commenting that the entire thing was complete bullshit because there was a reference to the huffington post in the article.
Now this was really bizarre, they started saying/thinking that the study was done by the huffington post simply because this article by psychology today made a reference to the paper.
I had to repeat over and over in plain language that the study was done by a peer reviewed psychological research journal, the gold standard in scientific evidence. Obviously this was stupid on my part, not realizing that stupid people have no fucking idea what a peer reviewed research journal even is and those words mean nothing to them.
Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes
Lower Cognitive Ability Predicts Greater Prejudice Through Right-Wing Ideology and Low Intergroup Contact
In an analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative United Kingdom data sets (N = 15,874), we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology
To many of us this is no surprise. It seems every politician and private citizen we know that is completely ignorant or in denial of very real scientific facts find themselves on the right.
To the rest of you, especially conservatives, what do you have to say about this? Are there any broader implications to be made from it?
What was hilarious to me and extremely ironic is that when I posted an article from psychology today that was citing this study to talk about the issue; several very dim right wingers I know came in commenting that the entire thing was complete bullshit because there was a reference to the huffington post in the article.
Now this was really bizarre, they started saying/thinking that the study was done by the huffington post simply because this article by psychology today made a reference to the paper.
I had to repeat over and over in plain language that the study was done by a peer reviewed psychological research journal, the gold standard in scientific evidence. Obviously this was stupid on my part, not realizing that stupid people have no fucking idea what a peer reviewed research journal even is and those words mean nothing to them.
Last edited by a moderator: