• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

I don't know what RTE. I asked in my initial post if anyone had any details about the case and no one provided any links so I had to do my own research.


That's some details from day one I can't find the pbp for that day

You can find the rest by following the dates on here.

https://www.rte.ie/search/query/McGregor as it happened
 
I know in the USA if you're 51% sure someone did something in a civil case you can/should vote guilty. You can/should only but guilty in a criminal case if you're 99% sure someone did something. Even if you're 97% sure you should vote not guilty.

But I'm really, really sick of these rape cases whether guys get taken to the cleaners in a civil case but there's not even a mention of trying to send him to prison in a criminal case.

The criminal case should come first and then that should open the door for civil litigation. And I'm not saying if you lose the criminal case you can't sue in civil court. I'm just saying there shouldn't be a civil case without a criminal one in cases like this.

Dude gets to rape someone, pay some money and then go back to normal? Nah. GTFO with that.
Outside murder the next worse crime you can do is rape and sometimes murder is justifiable. Rape IS NEVER JUSTIFIABLE.
 
It was turned down for a reason and that is enough
The issue is that a criminal case is “beyond a reasonable doubt,” which is a very high standard. meaning a higher level of certainty is required to convict someone of a crime.

You are confusing the criteria of conviction with the criteria of opening a criminal case. The reason why it didn't go to a criminal court is beyond ridiculous.

The woman was battered, there's reports of her by doctors she was traumatized, had a tampon incrusted in her vagina that had to be surgically removed by a forcep.

Anyone who thinks that was a "consensual" encounter is a moron.
 
I know in the USA if you're 51% sure someone did something in a civil case you can/should vote guilty. You can/should only but guilty in a criminal case if you're 99% sure someone did something. Even if you're 97% sure you should vote not guilty.

But I'm really, really sick of these rape cases whether guys get taken to the cleaners in a civil case but there's not even a mention of trying to send him to prison in a criminal case.

She tried to pursue a criminal case first
 
This "Civil" stuff is very weird in sexual cases. I have no opinion.
Ive never heard about it in my (Euro) country and think it's only a thing in Anglo Common law countries.

Just prosecute criminally if the state thinks we need to protect the citizenry. And then If you fail you fail.

 
Last edited:
Am I understanding this correctly that she slept with someone else the same night after this happened?
 

That's some details from day one I can't find the pbp for that day

You can find the rest by following the dates on here.

https://www.rte.ie/search/query/McGregor as it happened
Not seeing anything I haven't already read. She drank, did cocaine, then went with Conor to his suite with a friend. She claims she was raped, Conor claims they had consensual sex. Her friend does not back up her story. She also doesn't even remember having sex with the other dude.

Like I said, maybe it happened as she says. But I'm personally not convinced and think she was high out of her mind and then regretted it later. The tampon story can easily be explained away by being banged multiple times by two dudes. It's not the worst tampon story I've heard involving sex.
 
Not seeing anything I haven't already read. She drank, did cocaine, then went with Conor to his suite with a friend. She claims she was raped, Conor claims they had consensual sex. Her friend does not back up her story. She also doesn't even remember having sex with the other dude.

Like I said, maybe it happened as she says. But I'm personally not convinced and think she was high out of her mind and then regretted it later. The tampon story can easily be explained away by being banged multiple times by two dudes. It's not the worst tampon story I've heard involving sex.
Wasn't the tampon stuck up her ass?
And who the hell involves tampons during sexually activity?

Actually don't answer. I don't want to know.
 
You are confusing the criteria of conviction with the criteria of opening a criminal case. The reason why it didn't go to a criminal court is beyond ridiculous.

The woman was battered, there's reports of her by doctors she was traumatized, had a tampon incrusted in her vagina that had to be surgically removed by a forcep.

Anyone who thinks that was a "consensual" encounter is a moron.

She battered herself the next day and drove the tampon up herself

She had loving, consensual sex with conor and his mate

I also believe in Santa Claus and the Easter bunny

Fucking low I.q idiots
 
You are confusing the criteria of conviction with the criteria of opening a criminal case. The reason why it didn't go to a criminal court is beyond ridiculous.a

The woman was battered, there's reports of her by doctors she was traumatized, had a tampon incrusted in her vagina that had to be surgically removed by a forcep.

Anyone who thinks that was a "consensual" encounter is a moron.
A case can be opened when there is probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and that the defendant was responsible. A prosecutor evaluates a criminal case to determine if it can be won by assessing the strength of the evidence available, including whether it is sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Prosecutors look to see if the case can be won on those criterias.

I did not say that Conor did not do it, I said that the conviction in civil court is not the same as criminal court. You are over thinking this
 
Last edited:
But he wasn't found guilty Sherbro. Click Bait title got you... It's called being Civilly Liable.
Semantics

In the eyes of normal and decent people he is considered guilty of rape

Not guilty in a legal court

Whatever

Decent human beings consider him guilty of raping that poor woman
 
No word play... You don't know what you are talking about.

The term "guilty" is not used in civil court, but a defendant can be found liable in a civil case:


  • Civil court
    The civil justice system determines liability for injuries, not guilt or innocence. The standard of proof in a civil case is a "preponderance of the evidence," which means the plaintiff must prove it's more likely than not that the defendant is liable. If the defendant is found liable, they must usually pay the victim monetary damages.
Terminology in every day parlance and terminology in a court of law do not always exactly marry

And you know this

You are just trying to be cute with your words
 
Conor being a scumbag and idiot / Girl being a fame chasing slut(why would you do drugs and go to a hotel room with a stranger?) = Nothing new or shocking which shows how fucked up parts of the society are nowadays
 
How do I know they are fake? Because I understand the game from a higher perspective, delve into esoteric understanding of things, and the structure of control that is being presented to a casual participant.
So basically you watched some tiktoks and saw some tweets that your algorithm figured you would like

Like come on dude, it sounds like you are reading off a fucking script
 
Back
Top