Her changing elements of the story doesn't mean an assault didn't happen. And her attorney doing that just implies more so what I think happened in that I think the attorney encouraged that girl to exaggerate and lie about parts of the story so they would win the case.
Lawyers do that shit to try help their clients win, even if she believed her that she was assaulted - lawyers are snakey and she knew she probably wouldn't win the case unless more forceful descriptions were involved maybe, vs. her saying she went in their willingly, didn't expect that, pushed him off and that was that... which seems to be more likely what happened and what the accuser texted the security guard and sounds authentic as fuck. She just seems naive.
So then her lawyer was probably like 'oh okay, you went into the bathroom?.. you sure you weren't forced in there??? think about it? I think you were forced. Yep. You 'pushed him off' why was he aggressivE? So you had to like, smack and elbow him off right?'
That doesn't mean McGregor didn't attempt to rape her.
Again, that doesn't prove anything what happened in that bathroom. Or that McGregor is innocent.