Crime Congresswoman Lauren Boebert may have run afoul of the law *Update: Lauren Boebert's ex-husband arrested after Colorado restaurant row

He shouldn't have done those things, it was the wrong thing to do.
Ghost of Ripskater
Sinister said:
To think this woman had the nerve to get on stage and incessantly b*tch about how America needs Church. Husband is an abusive pervert, Son is a criminal, and she's out here running around touching Democrats' jimmies in public.
Click to expand...
But that's exactly why America needs church !

---
How do I link pictures and gifs? I am not able to do that since the forum revised its software.
 
Blayt7hh said:
How minor though? I mean he’s 18 so if she’s like 17 it’s not really a thing
Click to expand...


dude. he's recording a minor having sex. it doesn't matter how old he is or how old she is. whether she is 9, 14, 17, it don't matter. the minor is not old enough to legally give consent, and any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

advocating for depiction if underage women engaging in sexual videos is probably not the road to go down. if one of them is a minor it's still very much illegal to record, possess, and distribute footage of any kind of acts of sexual activity with them. this is how people go to prison and have to be segregated from the rest of the inmates. but generally those people are often a fair bit older than 18. doesn't matter though, the law is the law.

but odds are they might just confiscate his shit and let it go if that was really just a personal video and she is is girlfriend and is almost 18 and her parents are okay with it. now if he was a bit older, or if he uploaded it to the internet somewhere or distributed it to someone else or reproduced copies of it on a seperate device it was recorded from, he would be in some very deep shit.

nonetheless for a politician who's MO is to just call everybody she disagrees with a groomer and acting like she's all about protecting the children, its really quite hypocritical when her adult son is out there impregnating minors and making sex tapes with them. it doesn't really look good. especially when that person and some owner of a gay bar got caught feeling each other up in a theater with all kinds of children around.
 
Last edited:
According to the incident summary, a total of six victims were involved in the case, ranging in age from 3 to 64. Boebert was detained along with three other minor suspects whose names were redacted.

An arrest affidavit obtained by The Daily Beast said Boebert sent around a sex tape involving him and a fellow suspect, who’s a minor, in the alleged crime spree.

None of Boebert’s charges are related to the purported sex tape, which police said was also alluded to by another minor quoted in the affidavit. That unnamed minor said the video was sent around to people they knew.

www.thedailybeast.com

Lauren Boebert’s Son Allegedly Made Sex Tape With Crime Spree Accomplice

Boebert was wearing a “Shooters Grill” top that read “Grits N Glory”—a sweatshirt from his family’s now-closed restaurant—during the alleged thefts.
www.thedailybeast.com

distributing child pornography. yikes. there is absolutely no age where that is legal or acceptable.
 
Last edited:
idrankyourbeer said:
According to the incident summary, a total of six victims were involved in the case, ranging in age from 3 to 64. Boebert was detained along with three other minor suspects whose names were redacted.

An arrest affidavit obtained by The Daily Beast said Boebert sent around a sex tape involving him and a fellow suspect, who’s a minor, in the alleged crime spree.

None of Boebert’s charges are related to the purported sex tape, which police said was also alluded to by another minor quoted in the affidavit. That unnamed minor said the video was sent around to people they knew.

www.thedailybeast.com

Lauren Boebert’s Son Allegedly Made Sex Tape With Crime Spree Accomplice

Boebert was wearing a “Shooters Grill” top that read “Grits N Glory”—a sweatshirt from his family’s now-closed restaurant—during the alleged thefts.
www.thedailybeast.com

distributing child pornography. yikes. there is absolutely no age where that is legal or acceptable.
Click to expand...

Like father, like son.
 
idrankyourbeer said:
dude. he's recording a minor having sex. it doesn't matter how old he is or how old she is. whether she is 9, 14, 17, it don't matter. the minor is not old enough to legally give consent, and any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

advocating for depiction if underage women engaging in sexual videos is probably not the road to go down. if one of them is a minor it's still very much illegal to record, possess, and distribute footage of any kind of acts of sexual activity with them. this is how people go to prison and have to be segregated from the rest of the inmates. but generally those people are often a fair bit older than 18. doesn't matter though, the law is the law.

but odds are they might just confiscate his shit and let it go if that was really just a personal video and she is is girlfriend and is almost 18 and her parents are okay with it. now if he was a bit older, or if he uploaded it to the internet somewhere or distributed it to someone else or reproduced copies of it on a seperate device it was recorded from, he would be in some very deep shit.

nonetheless for a politician who's MO is to just call everybody she disagrees with a groomer and acting like she's all about protecting the children, its really quite hypocritical when her adult son is out there impregnating minors and making sex tapes with them. it doesn't really look good. especially when that person and some owner of a gay bar got caught feeling each other up in a theater with all kinds of children around.
Click to expand...
lol give me a break. Nothing I said warranted this crazy response. At 18 it could literally just be a 17 year old he went to class with. Of course it matters. It’s not like he’s magically more mature than her if he turned 18 5 months before her.

Just because we do t like them doesn’t mean we have to throw out common sense
 
Blayt7hh said:
lol give me a break. Nothing I said warranted this crazy response. At 18 it could literally just be a 17 year old he went to class with. Of course it matters. It’s not like he’s magically more mature than her if he turned 18 5 months before her.

Just because we do t like them doesn’t mean we have to throw out common sense
Click to expand...

Dude. You seem to be mixing up two separate things:
  1. Him having sex with a girl under 18. Your argument is perfectly valid for this. The age difference as well as the specific age of consent in the place where the intercourse took place as well, are all things that change the tenor of the events.
  2. Him recording a girl under the age of 18 having sexual intercourse. The age of her partner, or whether the intercourse was consensual is completely irrelevant. The fact that she is under 18 is all that matters for such a recording to be considered child pornography.
He is not in trouble for having sex with a girl who is under 18. He is in trouble for making a video recording of a girl under 18 having sex.
 
JadeOwl said:
Dude. You seem to be mixing up two separate things:
  1. Him having sex with a girl under 18. Your argument is perfectly valid for this. The age difference as well as the specific age of consent in the place where the intercourse took place as well, are all things that change the tenor of the events.
  2. Him recording a girl under the age of 18 having sexual intercourse. The age of her partner, or whether the intercourse was consensual is completely irrelevant. The fact that she is under 18 is all that matters for such a recording to be considered child pornography.
He is not in trouble for having sex with a girl who is under 18. He is in trouble for making a video recording of a girl under 18 having sex.
Click to expand...
If you agree that it’s not an issue that they had sex, how is it anymore of an issue if they made a video? Granted if she didn’t know about it or he’s sharing it and putting on line that changes it, but otherwise I don’t see how the math is different
 
BROWNPRIDE said:
Bro she was a call girl before. Facts just look it up.
Click to expand...

I think that was debunked. I know, CNN not a legitimate source.




amp.cnn.com

Fact check: Democratic group makes multiple false claims in its dramatic allegations about Lauren Boebert's past

A Democratic super PAC has made multiple false claims about Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert while pushing unproven allegations that the right-wing Colorado congresswoman has had abortions and formerly worked as an escort, all of which Boebert vehemently denies.
amp.cnn.com amp.cnn.com
 
MicroBrew said:
He shouldn't have done those things, it was the wrong thing to do.
Ghost of Ripskater

But that's exactly why America needs church !

---
How do I link pictures and gifs? I am not able to do that since the forum revised its software.
Click to expand...
You need to paste the URL into the box that opens when you click the insert image button in the toolbar at the top of the post composition window. It's in the middle next to the insert link button.

That, or you can go the old fashioned route and put the URL between [ IMG ] and [ /IMG ] though you have to remove the spaces.
 
Blayt7hh said:
If you agree that it’s not an issue that they had sex, how is it anymore of an issue if they made a video? Granted if she didn’t know about it or he’s sharing it and putting on line that changes it, but otherwise I don’t see how the math is different
Click to expand...
Because making and distributing that video (which is what they allegedly did) counts as child porn. Child porn is illegal. The main thing here is that they shared/distributed it. There's now a good chance that video of a minor having sex is floating around on the internet.
 
CubicleGangster said:
Because making and distributing that video (which is what they allegedly did) counts as child porn. Child porn is illegal. The main thing here is that they shared/distributed it. There's now a good chance that video of a minor having sex is floating around on the internet.
Click to expand...
If he distributed then sure that’s different. I said that in the post you quoted
 
Blayt7hh said:
If he distributed then sure that’s different. I said that in the post you quoted
Click to expand...
Because filming alone also brings up a whole host of issues. Do you really think there should be more nuance here when it comes to recording minors having sex? I think a hard line in this instance is the correct thing.
 
CubicleGangster said:
Because filming alone also brings up a whole host of issues. Do you really think there should be more nuance here when it comes to recording minors having sex? I think a hard line in this instance is the correct thing.
Click to expand...
No. An 18 year old and a 17 year old doing that is extremely different than a 30 year old and a 17 year old
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,184
Messages
55,474,620
Members
174,787
Latest member
Biden's Diaper

Share this page

Back
Top