lol @ the losers using the lame "whining" tactic as their argument.
Sorry if we offended your movement.
Exactly. It's a debate about social norms, which never were exactly like people think they were in their minds. Extremely hyperbolic and frankly a little bit pathetic how "triggered" people are getting in here. I don't understand why so many people feel so threatened about their masculinity. Also there's a lot of irony going on in the way that "SJW"s are supposed to be the emotional ones.Alot of triggered bitches in this thread lol. It is a simple discussion on the evolution of words, meanings and social perception.
If watching a short video on social discussion turns you into this much of a whiny bitch- then goto a dictionary and re-read the definitions of 'masculine'.
This makes me legitimately fucking angry. This is bullshit. You cannot change the definition of a word like that. This is disgusting. The society we live in is a goddamn joke. I wish I could fight these goof ball cunts one by one.
I don't know if I'd use those exact words lol but I agree.... my masculinity is in no way shape or form threatened by this commercial.Yeah, they are. And TS is one of them. Only a pussy would be rustled by a commercial like that.
masculinity doesn't need to prove itself. you know its there when its there. fake masculine dudes are easy to detect:
Confidence, intelligence, Leadership skills, able to withstand adversity. not overly emotional, and being a good communicator.
fake alphas try to compensate with: ,muscles, bragging, being overly aggressive, buying cars and over the top items.
you either are or you aren't. if you aren't thats fine. but nothing you do will make you truly masculine. its just not in your genetics.
/thread
Sounds like something that this queer advocates.
This is what these "woke" losers type these days.
"
Exactly. It's a debate about social norms, which never were exactly like people think they were in their minds. Extremely hyperbolic and frankly a little bit pathetic how "triggered" people are getting in here. I don't understand why so many people feel so threatened about their masculinity. Also there's a lot of irony going on in the way that "SJW"s are supposed to be the emotional ones.
I like being "old school" masculine, but I agree that it's more than being aggressive and dominant. To me, the perfect example of masculinity is someone like my dad. Ex-Firefighter and paramedic, hunter, takes responsibility, very logical and intelligent. Yet, he taught me that a "real man" (whatever that is) is not afraid of his emotions, shows compassion and leads by virtue of bringing people together.
Exploring gender roles is hardly something new.
I'm not so sure that this is a more pressing problem today than before. You could argue the opposite is true in some ways. I mean, if you look at the education system, the increasing avaliability of technology and information has pushed the learning towards student centered learning compared to teacher centered. Meaning that autonomy is a bigger part of the learning process and students are reponsible for problem solving and determining what the problem is in the first place. You could argue our changes toward a more self-deterministic society is exactly why people are struggling with their identities so much.You don't need to be masculine to be put off by the slimy social engineering they are attempting to force on people-- that has literally zero to do with it.
They're not even aiming at the older or masculine demographic, they're aiming at the young and impressionable using an ad that simulates false consensus to pressure and manipulate them.
Remember the study that showed that most people won't speak up in classrooms and will even agree with things that are obviously wrong (1+3 =2, things like that) as long as the others in the class are agreeing with the teacher who is presenting the obviously wrong "information"? That's what this is, what they are attempting, and it should piss you off, assuming you have any sense to begin with.
Saw this on ESPN the other day. The fuck is this all about? Bunch of pussies want the definition of the word masculine changed because it doesn't fit them. The definition of words don't change just because they don't describe you.
One of the guy's defines masculine as "being able to smile, being able to cry, being able to love...and be loved"
That describes a lot of things but it doesn't describe the word masculine.
Another's definition "what does it mean to me to be masculine? It's more a question of what does it mean to be human?"
I hate it when dipshits try to be profound. This dude doesn't even know what the fuck he's saying. He's trying to land himself on some girls tumblr as an inspirational quote meme. I can't believe this shit actually airs on television these days.
I'm not so sure that this is a more pressing problem today than before. You could argue the opposite is true in some ways. I mean, if you look at the education system, the increasing avaliability of technology and information has pushed the learning towards student centered learning compared to teacher centered. Meaning that autonomy is a bigger part of the learning process and students are reponsible for problem solving and determining what the problem is in the first place. You could argue our changes toward a more self-deterministic society is exactly why people are struggling with their identities so much.
Aren't these people doing exactly that? I mean, being self-deterministic and not following along the path of conformity and traditional "social engineering" (I use that term very carefully)? Thinking for themselves?
I think it's a tad stupid, but there's a few reason why I'm not worried.
1. I'm not afraid of the conversation
2. I don't think impending doom is around the corner, in that sexual identity has always been something that's been debated.
3. We are still biological creatures wired a certain way
4. I like "manly" things and so do most people
5. I actually agree that aggressiveness is not a good definition of masculinity.
Jeesh, you're far down the "red pill" rabbit hole huh?1. It's not a conversation. It's not meant to be 2-way in any respect.
2. It's not even about sexual identity
3. Brainwashed people are not effective or healthy, regardless of their initial wiring
4. Me too, for some things. No one should have to, though. The point isn't about whether manliness is a good thing or not. They're bypassing that to attempt to control the language to exclude it altogether from existing since the former attempt didn't work
5. It's not a correct definition either. Women like aggressive men but the word "aggressive" today has been smeared to imply an "out of control" quality, whereas before it used to equate to "pro-active" and able. The previous definition is correct and that's what all women (humans and mammals) prefer in male partners