Crime Cohen pleads guilty, says he lied

Association isn't enough. Unless the association is directly relevant to the criminal action.
For example, if it includes A directing B to do Y, A is exposed to criminal liability if Y is a criminal action.
So then it must be supported that A did indeed direct B to Y, which is another matter.
 
CNN and the rest of the leftist Democrat propaganda MSM is desperate (along with the FBI and the Democrat party) to sell illegality and their Democrat base is desperate to buy it.
 
So then it must be supported that A did indeed direct B to Y, which is another matter.
Yes, it does.

Would you like to bet on whether there is or will be evidence supporting that assertion?

As an aside, you skipped my poisonous tree inquiry. Should I assume that you aren't sure whether or how it applies here?
 
If these crimes are proven it will be because a crook thought he could become President and then bury any investigation if he came into power. He thought he'd be the boss of the government they way he was with his business.

So you believe a charge regarding Russian Collusion is still coming? Thst was the pretense of this whole investigation. You can't make up a reason to investigate somebody and then use crimes you may find throughout the investigation to justify investigating to begin with.

Now if the opening of the investigation was legit, I'd have no problem with crimes being uncovered in the process of the investigation, even those completely unrelated
 
It takes a special kind of confirmation bias to come to the conclusion that A is guilty of X because B is guilty of Y and is associated with A, though Y does not equal X. The logic just doesn't add up.

Please, explain the calculus.
When everybody but you is headed to prison/cutting deals with the prosecutor, what conclusion will a rational, unbiased person come to about you and your associations?

Crooks plus boss of crooks = a whole fucking bunch of crooks.

Not calculus, simple arithmetic.
 
Yes, it does.

Would you like to bet on whether there is or will be evidence supporting that assertion?

As an aside, you skipped my poisonous tree inquiry. Should I assume that you aren't sure whether or how it applies here?
It may apply to the initial warrant. It would seem that everything under the sun is being found with the "collusion" warrant that is not collusion.
 
I don't understand. One has to do with opposing a witch hunt; the other has to do with those that have already been convicted. Sure, many of those that were convicted were indeed innocent, but that's where your hypocrisy comes in.
The cult member recites the same lies of the cult leader
 
When everybody but you is headed to prison/cutting deals with the prosecutor, what conclusion will a rational, unbiased person come to about you and your associations?

Crooks plus boss of crooks = a whole fucking bunch of crooks.

Not calculus, simple arithmetic.
Simple arithmetic has many innocent men and women behind bars. Don't use lazy cop/prosecutor logic.
 
They make feminine hygiene products for your bleeding issue
Big ones

It’s a funnyonion article you inflamed vag
I wanted to say something, but I didn't know what to say after seeing Hunter's response. My incredulosity was beyond the red line.
 
Last edited:
Simple arithmetic has many innocent men and women behind bars. Don't use lazy cop/prosecutor logic.
Don't believe crooks over law enforcement.

Don't support a Russian stooge.
Find someone else, someone worthy of respect next election.

I'm not biased against Republicans.
I'm biased against Donald Trump because he's morally bankrupt and weighed down with too much baggage.

Find someone else. Don't put all your eggs in that fat basket.
 
I'm pretty excited, its starting to get good. Seeing Trump go down in flames would be even sweeter than seeing Hildog lose to Trump. Would be a good way to bookend the last few years for us folk that think both sides are bat shit cray cray.
 
So failure to disclose is the grand charge you have? No quid pro quo, just meeting and talking with foreign nationals is your Russia burger? Much like campaign finance violations, I really dont care.
That's just what's public information.
 
I'm pretty excited, its starting to get good. Seeing Trump go down in flames would be even sweeter than seeing Hildog lose to Trump. Would be a good way to bookend the last few years for us folk that think both sides are bat shit cray cray.
Yah, whichever side of "Crooked Donald Trump is a traitorous crook" you're on, this is all hugely entertaining to watch.

I've been documenting it all because I'll be looking back on these years in the future and will want to be able to say what happened.
 
Exactly which part of the meeting was illegal? Be specific please. Which law was broken?
Well it'san illegal campaign donation from a foreign government as it is an in kind contribution and the effort to conceal it from the public via perjury is a criminal conspiracy.

Collusion is a lay term in this context as the crime of collusion I believe has to do with price fixing and so would never be applicable in this case. Therefore we have to go by the lay definition of collusion:
"secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others."
By that standard the trump tower meeting and the effort to keep russian contact from the public via perjury is most definitely collusion. Sorry brotha but you'll just have to accept it.
 
Back
Top