Elections Clinton vs Trump Polls thread (Clinton's Bounce Larger than Trump's)

Prediction on Win Margin for Election Night (Electoral College)


  • Total voters
    88
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
OK, so then we cut it down 50%. Sounds good.
Except you won't cut it 50%...the border is much too large to maintain and the people who are stopped will simply just use other avenues of arriving in the states. Seriously I mean all that happens when you're caught is you're turned back around, some family who came all the way from Bolivia or Guatemala isn't going to go "oh well guess we can't make it!" they're going to keep trying until they get in, just like they do now with the current border patrol.

The cost to actual illegal immigration deterrence ratio is terrible, that's why the wall is a retarded idea.

MORE people come to the US legally and overstay than enter a border illegally, and the number of people crossing the border drops every year.

liuvA65N-tiWF1Y675TFhC8k1X5_zRwxmIPYtXoFmt6YiQM1n-sfQZZPBbM4oQq6Au-jFG2qK08D-hDJfr6IrNGw6pMaFpsf2CE0zNTkmlnveigLIRrQlHjuY0lI8xLxc1Iu5DY


Also more Mexicans have gone back to Mexico than immigrated to America since 2005, another reason I'm confused Trump is obsessed with the border: http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/19/more-mexicans-leaving-than-coming-to-the-u-s/
 
Last edited:
Interesting that Nate Silver is giving Trump basically no chance.
Between his call and the polls all summer, we'll get a pretty clear picture of how things will pan out.

One is an elite that just got away with treason among a vile criminal acts that the public knows about. The other isn't taking lobbyists funding. It's pretty obvious where it's going. The train of stupidity and free money enslaving future generations rolls on. Insert women are victims narrative to her campaign with clown music playing in the background.
 
I think Trump has provided Hillary plenty of ammo as well.



Birther Movement
Multiple divorces
multiple bankruptcies
Ban All Muslims
Mexican Judge racebaiting

These debates might be the most entertaining ever.


The judge himself is of Mexican heritage and therefore makes him a conflict of interest. This is called common sense but in a culture of victim hood and stupidity knows no bounds.
 
One is an elite that just got away with treason among a vile criminal acts that the public knows about. The other isn't taking lobbyists funding. It's pretty obvious where it's going. The train of stupidity and free money enslaving future generations rolls on. Insert women are victims narrative to her campaign with clown music playing in the background.
Oooooohhh...kay
 
The judge himself is of Mexican heritage and therefore makes him a conflict of interest. This is called common sense but in a culture of victim hood and stupidity knows no bounds.
LOL. Using that logic, the only people fit to oversee a trial involving Trump would be white males, as he has also made highly prejudicial remarks about Muslims, blacks, and women.

Holy Cow, maybe that explains why Trump is running for president. A cunning plan to ensure only white male judges in all his lawsuits-forever!!!
 
LOL. Using that logic, the only people fit to oversee a trial involving Trump would be white males, as he has also made highly prejudicial remarks about Muslims, blacks, and women.

It's the law. If he cannot give an unbias verdict due to a conflict of interest (Mexican heritage + media race bait + Trumps stance in illegal aliens) he clearly shouldn't be involved. This is common sense stupidity argues otherwise.

Holy Cow, maybe that explains why Trump is running for president. A cunning plan to ensure only white male judges in all his lawsuits-forever!!!

Insert blm sob story here wait wut?
 
The judge himself is of Mexican heritage and therefore makes him a conflict of interest. This is called common sense but in a culture of victim hood and stupidity knows no bounds.

just thought you should know this is a textbook racist comment, as defined by Paul Ryan.
 
just thought you should know this is a textbook racist comment, as defined by Paul Ryan.

If you cannot see how it is a conflict of interest you are an idiot. Thr judge is of mexucan heritage. He is to judge truml who is clamping diwn on illegal immigration. Even thr potential gor a confluct of interest is enough to request another impartial judge. Typical claim of racism usually follows when somebody of lower intelligence cannot handle a conversation. Checkmate.
 
If you cannot see how it is a conflict of interest you are an idiot. Thr judge is of mexucan heritage. He is to judge truml who is clamping diwn on illegal immigration. Even thr potential gor a confluct of interest is enough to request another impartial judge. Typical claim of racism usually follows when somebody of lower intelligence cannot handle a conversation. Checkmate.

If you take this to the logical conclusion then you're going to run out of judges pretty fast. Anything short of a white male is going to be a conflict of interest.
 
If you take this to the logical conclusion then you're going to run out of judges pretty fast. Anything short of a white male is going to be a conflict of interest.

It's part of the legal system whereby a person is allowed a fair trial. A conflict of interest contradicts fairness. This isn't rocket science. This is just common sense.

I recently watched a fool pick a fight with a little girl and when confronted by a spectator cried racist despite their being a fucking idiot.

Uttering "racist" is the cry of the moron along with the SJWs and victim culture. Intelligence is disregarded by the stupid. Imagine, actual free thinking.
 
If you cannot see how it is a conflict of interest you are an idiot. Thr judge is of mexucan heritage. He is to judge truml who is clamping diwn on illegal immigration. Even thr potential gor a confluct of interest is enough to request another impartial judge. Typical claim of racism usually follows when somebody of lower intelligence cannot handle a conversation. Checkmate.

drunkpost.jpg
 
It's part of the legal system whereby a person is allowed a fair trial. A conflict of interest contradicts fairness. This isn't rocket science. This is just common sense.

I recently watched a fool pick a fight with a little girl and when confronted by a spectator cried racist despite their being a fucking idiot.

Would Judge Joe Brown or Judge Judy be allowed to judge Trump under your fantasy legal system?
 
change your tone and we can have a discussion. Until then, you've shown nothing that equates to free thinking or even base line common sense.
Common sense is a segregated legal system. Trump should only have while judges on his cases. Mexicans ( or anyone who has Mexican blood in them) can have a separate, but equal, legal system.
 
change your tone and we can have a discussion. Until then, you've shown nothing that equates to free thinking or even base line common sense.

There's no legal precedent for what you consider to be "common sense" though. It really is just fantasy shit that you're inventing on the spot.
 
Judge Gonzalo Curiel is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association (SDLRLA). Total conflict of interest.

la-raza-protest-sign.jpg


Aztlan-La-Raza-Whites-Get-Out.gif
 
It really is just fantasy shit that you're inventing on the spot.

Do you want to make a bet? Are you saying that a conflict of interest is not a concern? Again, until you change your tone this conversation is over. Work on an attitude adjustment. Try free thinking.

Disqualifying a Judge from a Criminal Case

A judge may be disqualified from a case if he has a conflict of interest or if his continuing participation in the case seems unfair. A judge has a duty to identify the existence of recusal grounds. Recusal is the disqualification of a judge because of prejudice or conflict of interest.


A judge can be recused by objections from either party. Also, judges can disqualify themselves.

Specific conflicts of interest that require a judge be disqualified include:

  • A substantial financial interest in the case
  • Prior representation in private practice by the judge of a party with an interest in the case
  • A relative of the judge acting as a lawyer in the same case
Judge's Partiality Raised by Motion
Any party may raise the issue of a judge's partiality by motion. Also, the court may raise the issue of a judge's partiality on its own. The party seeking disqualification must raise the issue as soon as the facts suggesting the lack of the judge's impartiality become known.

The defendant can't wait until after an unfavorable result has been reached before he tries to have the judge removed. Sometimes the failure to seek recusal until after an unfavorable result has occurred is considered a waiver of disqualification of the judge, which is not reviewable on appeal.
http://criminal.lawyers.com/criminal-law-basics/disqualifying-a-judge-from-a-criminal-case.html

No precedent?

creepy-tom-cruise-animated-gifs-1.gif


No just the law lol
This is called common sense. Common sense these days is not so common. /discussion
 
Last edited:
Judge Gonzalo Curiel is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association (SDLRLA). Total conflict of interest.

la-raza-protest-sign.jpg


Aztlan-La-Raza-Whites-Get-Out.gif

But you are a racist for delivery of the conflict of interest.

In America, intelligence is dismissed by cries of racist or sexist due to the inability of conversing in a manner that portrays something of higher thinking. It reeks of victim culture but don't worry.

Donald Trump will make America great again.

666cf080-4374-0133-9d85-0af7184f89fb.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,118
Messages
57,969,081
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair
Back
Top