Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)

Status
Not open for further replies.
He just went through a TWO year SC investigation to find out if he was up to no good. LOL.

You're just salty it produced facts, and those facts weren't what you wanted to hear. It's over little buddy. Time to move on.

Let's let Congress do their job first, "Eh"? ;)
 


Sooooo Presidential...

th
 
We did. We heard loud and clear "NO MORE INDICTMENTS". You guys were soooo sure that Trump Jr was getting indicted for lying about the Trump Tower meeting, and that it was clear proof of collusion. What happened? Did Barr cover that up too?

Tell me, what do you think is in the Mueller report that changes anything?

It's over.
We also hear there are several on-going investigations. Again, if Mueller clears Trump I will fully accept it. I will not accept the summary/conclusions of his appointed AG who is clearly behaving like Trump's defense attorney.

And you can check my posting history - the word "collusion" was bogus from the start (I created a thread on it if you want more of my thoughts).

I can't answer your last question because I don't know what's in the report - that's my whole point. I will wait to see what's in it. What is noted is you're not talking about obstruction, which it appears 10 instances were investigated and Mueller's team already disagreed with Barr's assessment on that front. Why is that?
 
Strychnine......

I don't believe everything the government tells me.....

1 minute later......

I'm gonna wait to hear what the Dems in the house tell me what to think.
 
Chris Wallace, a Republican and Fox news reporter:

"The Attorney General seemed almost to be acting as the counselor for the defense, the counselor for the president, rather than the Attorney General, talking about his motives, his emotions... Really, as I say, making a case for the president."

Yup. Precisely.
 
We also hear there are several on-going investigations. Again, if Mueller clears Trump I will fully accept it. I will not accept the summary/conclusions of his appointed AG who is clearly behaving like Trump's defense attorney.

And you can check my posting history - the word "collusion" was bogus from the start (I created a thread on it if you want more of my thoughts).

I can't answer your last question because I don't know what's in the report - that's my whole point. I will wait to see what's in it. What is noted is you're not talking about obstruction, which it appears 10 instances were investigated and Mueller's team already disagreed with Barr's assessment on that front. Why is that?
 
h8omhqntfxs21.jpg


I'll take "Things that I never thought I would see" for 500, Alex.<Dany07><Dany07><Dany07><Dany07><Dany07><Dany07>
 
Again, if Mueller clears Trump I will fully accept it.

He did. You haven't.

You guys are so utterly desperate. It's really sad. You are honestly convinced that Barr somehow took the report home, let nobody else see it, and completely covered up the whole thing(and magically made Mueller not indict anyone for conspiracy), and the REAL report has everything you want to hear in it.

Seriously, take a good look at how delusional you are over this whole thing. It's fucking embarrassing.
 
He did. You haven't.

You guys are so utterly desperate. It's really sad. You are honestly convinced that Barr somehow took the report home, let nobody else see it, and completely covered up the whole thing(and magically made Mueller not indict anyone for conspiracy), and the REAL report has everything you want to hear in it.

Seriously, take a good look at how delusional you are over this whole thing. It's fucking embarrassing.
Don’t you think Muller would take issue by now with what Barr said
 
Report is out and

Mueller was unable to prove that “no criminal” conduct occurred.

Trump campaign “expected” benefit from Russias illegal actions.

Mueller describes “myriad of Trump associate contacts with Russians”

“While this report does not conclude the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him”
 


If Congress (checks and balances cited here) says nothing is to come of this than that's it. What I won't accept is someone (Barr) who wrote a 10-page letter saying that if he were A.G. wouldn't prosecute the President. Period. Saying it's all good when he's giving speeches that are 100% Trump talking points.

Let's let Congress do their job and let the chips fall where they may. I'll accept that 100%. Full stop.
 
I do t care what the attorney general, the DOJ or the FBI says, I need to hear what @MikeMcMann says about it, he knows more about it than all these people and had proof.

Fucking LOL at mike mclame.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top