Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You should probably let Mueller know. Maybe he missed a key piece of evidence that you're privy to, and will reopen the investigation.

Well, when it gets to Congress, we'll see what they have to say about it.
 
Progressive/liberals today run on pure emotion. They're a mental roller coaster. Mueller was a literal hero to them a couple of months ago.

Lol that’s exactly what republicans do, run on pure emotion.

Abortion - emotion
Gay marriage - emotion
Single payer - emotion

Every big issue you guys only use emotion. It’s funny
 
Cnn is literally murdering journalism right now.

Disgusting.

I think it counts as necrophilia at this point. The corpse of journalism has been rotting for a long time in the CNN offices. They're just fucking it everyday.
 
Now that they know the public can't legally see anything but a redacted version of the report-
Until we see the completely unredacted report.....

Completely unredacted report......


Completely unredacted report......
Stupid spin by you.

The 'unredacted report viewing call' assumes viewing by Congress and the Gang of 8 as everyone knows certain things around National Security and Ongoing investigations will be redacted from all but Congress and the Gang of 8.

But all the subjective redactions are what they are talking about. The ones where Barr is using his discretion to redact around 'people not charged' and their roles, etc.

So you can continue to resort to spin or deal with the facts and true issues.
 
Nadler and Liberals in 1999 - "Releasing the unredacted Starr report is not possible. There is classified material that needs to be redacted, and salacious material within the report that would be unfair to the President to have released to the public."

Nadler and Liberals in 2019 - "Release everything! No redactions! Redactions mean you're hiding something!"

ROFL, these fucking clowns.
Should we quote what Republicans were saying at the same time? And how that differs from now?


Or better yet forget partisan spin as we all know both sides do it. Instead look at what is IN FACT important. Spin aside what was prior precedent in those prior investigations? Precedent and not spin should dictate in law.

Do you need me to call up precedent for you on the Starr report and other? You will then see who the 'clowns' are.
 
Last edited:
Well, when it gets to Congress, we'll see what they have to say about it.

Is that your new hope? LOL.

It's over, bud. You were bamboozled for two straight years. You just have to come to terms with it. Heal your wounds, don't pick the scabs. Picking scabs just causes more bleeding and pain.
 
Wow dude, you need a reality check.

Nah, I'm good homie.
You shouldn't take everything that the Government gives you at face value.

And this is coming from a retired Veteran.
 
Is that your new hope? LOL.

It's over, bud. You were bamboozled for two straight years. You just have to come to terms with it. Heal your wounds, don't pick the scabs. Picking scabs just causes more bleeding and pain.

Yeah, who needs a Government with checks and balances on the President?
 
Yeah, it's funny...

Who needs Congress to actually have checks and balances on the President.

Nah, just make President Trump emperor already!
And when Congress also says no collusion, they will also be a bunch of shills covering for Trump. Right?
 
And when Congress also says no collusion, they will also be a bunch of shills covering for Trump. Right?

Absolutely not.

It will be Congress doing their job and I will accept it wholeheartedly.
 
Yeah, who needs a Government with checks and balances on the President?

He just went through a TWO year SC investigation to find out if he was up to no good. LOL.

You're just salty it produced facts, and those facts weren't what you wanted to hear. It's over little buddy. Time to move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top