Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)

Status
Not open for further replies.
bobgeese said:
PS, @Fawlty @andnowweknow @Darkballs

7mxm.jpg





Does this not qualify as turning on Meuller?
Click to expand...

Not that I believe what Vice is saying in that article but if tRUmp had nothing to fear from an insider like Mueller wouldn't that in turn make tRUmp an insider?

<Dylan>
 
tonni said:
You made this exact same post in the previous version.
Click to expand...
He spent so much time coming up with such a witty post, and is so proud, you can expect it copy and pasted into each subsequent iteration.
 
luckyshot said:


"Russia, if you are listening, I hope you are able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily [...] I'd love to see them."

Trump has trained you marmots to yell "No collusion!" as if that's the end of the discussion-- just ignoring the fact that Russia clearly helped him, and he clearly had no problem accepting Russia's help.

From OP:
The Barr summary concludes that, although the Russian government stole intelligence in order to interfere with the election, and reached out to members of the Trump campaign, the Trump campaign did not assist the Russian government in that interference-it merely reaped the benefits of it. Per Barr's analysis, this passive acceptance stops short of collusion.
Click to expand...


So like... There was no collusion. You get that right? Because you just quoted that.
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
Not that I believe what Vice is saying in that article but if tRUmp had nothing to fear from an insider like Mueller wouldn't that in turn make tRUmp an insider?

<Dylan>
Click to expand...

Yes, he's an insider. You know who isn't an insider? All of us.​
 
MikeMcMann said:
"Collusion" does not exist as a chargeable offense so you were never going to get that.

What many of them were for was for "links" or "coordination" (elements of collusion) with Russia, and many people were found guilty for just that.
Click to expand...

ROFL, you are one single MSNBC talking point after another. You railed for months that Manafort alone was proof of collusion and the whole show was all over. Now, that you're standing there with egg on your face you've taken up MSNBC's very own new talking point, that none of this actually mattered and that collusion could never have been proven. It's sad to watch.

Secondly, no your second paragraph is so totally wrong and filled with TDS that it is, again, sad. Nothing Manafort was found guilty of had anything to with attempting to collude with Russia to influence the election, and that is specifically what the investigation was about. That specifically and nothing else. Stop trying to move the goal posts.
 
andnowweknow said:
A Vice opinion piece? C'mon. You're conflating an uber small percentage of "leftists" with the Democratic party.

Shocker Bob is strawmanning it up. Grasping hard.
Click to expand...


LOFuckingL at this.

The nutjobs are BY FAR the base of the democrat party. Sane democrats are rarer than hens teeth.
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
Not that I believe what Vice is saying in that article but if tRUmp had nothing to fear from an insider like Mueller wouldn't that in turn make tRUmp an insider?

<Dylan>
Click to expand...



Remember how I told you for 36 versions of this thread that people in power are never held accountable?

<seedat>



The difference is, I’ve been saying it for 2 years. Vice just figured it out after years of embarrassing themselves.
 
bobgeese said:
LOFuckingL at this.

The nutjobs are BY FAR the base of the democrat party. Sane democrats are rarer than hens teeth.
Click to expand...

It's funny, because they've using that excuse since before Trump got elected. Go ask these folks how crazy it would've been for anyone to suggest that the Dems would be seriously talking about reparations two years ago.

"Never. That's just some loony shit Reps like to say to make the Dems look crazy. No Dem would seriously go for it"

to

"You know, it's actually not a bad idea"
 
lfd0311 said:
ROFL, you are one single MSNBC talking point after another. You railed for months that Manafort alone was proof of collusion and the whole show was all over. Now, that you're standing there with egg on your face you've taken up MSNBC's very own new talking point, that none of this actually mattered and that collusion could never have been proven. It's sad to watch.

Secondly, no your second paragraph is so totally wrong and filled with TDS that it is, again, sad. Nothing Manafort was found guilty of had anything to with attempting to collude with Russia to influence the election, and that is specifically what the investigation was about. That specifically and nothing else. Stop trying to move the goal posts.
Click to expand...



“You know msnbc respects the talking points of Mike McCAN Joe”
 
HereticBD said:
It's funny, because they've using that excuse since before Trump got elected. Go ask these folks how crazy it would've been for anyone to suggest that the Dems would be seriously talking about reparations two years ago.

"Never. That's just some loony shit Reps like to say to make the Dems look crazy. No Dem would seriously go for it"

to

"You know, it's actually not a bad idea"
Click to expand...



Nah bro, democrats are totally sane. They’re running on common sense policies like,

Reparations???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,960
Messages
58,331,120
Members
176,002
Latest member
Shock7

Share this page

Back
Top