• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Chuck Liddell wouldn't even rank today

None of those guys mean much today. And if you think Chuck would stand a chance with modern Vitor or Overeem, it further proves your delusion.

They meant alot when Chuck fought them.

Seriously TS, how old are you?
 
I'll admit that I've always considered Chuck overrated, but he'd definitely be top 10 today, probably top 5 or at least close

Bones beats him
Gus beats him
DC beats him
Rashad right now I don't think can beat him (though I think Rashad at his best beats Chuck at his best)
Glover beats him
don't think Rumble beats him.
 
Hard to admit because I loved watching Chuck fight, but really he was just a tough bro who banged. Striking has evolved now to the point where every ranked fighter would watch tape on him, pick and angle to step away from the overhand right and then take out Chuck's chin, even in Chuck's prime.

Watching Firas's video of how Rory picked apart Woodley demonstrated how far striking in this sport has come. It's almost on par with boxing now.

quite an amazing post....you claim chuck 'wouldnt rank today'.....then when we are all still recovering from that,you finish us all off with....'its almost on a par with boxing now'
.
outstanding TS outstanding.
 
None of those guys mean much today. And if you think Chuck would stand a chance with modern Vitor or Overeem, it further proves your delusion.

It was almost a decade ago. At the time they were very real fighters. and by "modern day" are you referring to "less horse meat"?
 
I'll admit that I've always considered Chuck overrated, but he'd definitely be top 10 today, probably top 5 or at least close

Bones beats him
Gus beats him
DC beats him
Rashad right now I don't think can beat him (though I think Rashad at his best beats Chuck at his best)
Glover beats him
don't think Rumble beats him.

Only Bones and DC would give Chuck trouble.
 
Dude go back and watch some fights of the iceman in his prime, he was fast, great technique, his ttd was unbelievable and iron chin. To take down chuck was ridiculously hard.
Chuck IMO is much better then glover.

I watched him in his prime, genius.

You are repeating myths. Urban legends. Like Chuck had some magic chin. Bullshit. That Franklin shot would have put him down at any point of his career.

lol at great technique. He could not handle a modern fighter at all. Overhand right vs a a modern fighter. No. Nostalgia is a hell of a drug.

Machida would put a prime Chuck down too. He would knock him out. Weidman would beat him as well. We really should be asking if he would even be ranked at MW today.
 
Chuck fought a steady diet of guys with limited standup until he started getting ko'd. However, he had abilities that would still carry him into the top ten.
 
Dude Babe Ruth would be terrible by today's standards. He was just some fat guy that hit the ball far. Just look at how much more advanced the players are today; he wouldn't stand a chance LOL!!1

I get the point you are making, but that's a terrible analogy.
 
Lol JonesBones is such a New Breeder

Chuck would have whooped ass in any point in human past or future
 
I guess prime Tito and randy wouldn't even get into mma then.
 
I watched him in his prime, genius.

You are repeating myths. Urban legends. Like Chuck had some magic chin. Bullshit. That Franklin shot would have put him down at any point of his career.

lol at great technique. He could not handle a modern fighter at all. Overhand right vs a a modern fighter. No. Nostalgia is a hell of a drug.

Machida would put a prime Chuck down too. He would knock him out. Weidman would beat him as well. We really should be asking if he would even be ranked at MW today.

Your "knowledge" tells us otherwise.
 
Fedor, Chuck and all this old classics that people jack off over wouldn't last in this day an age, the sports evolved.
 
Chuck does not have fast hands or exceptional power, not enough to make a dent in today's game. Nowhere near the hand speed or boxing of Vitor. lol. fucking please.

Glover would take Chuck down and have his way with them. And have little threat from his standing. Rampage destroyed Chuck twice. Chuck had NOTHING for Rampage in his prime. And Glover has a slick ground game. Chuck would be subbed. He would be helpless.

I remember Chuck getting the best of Vitor in terms of boxing a decade ago although todays Vitor is obviously more well rounded standing.

Chuck would likely have problems today with a lot of the better strikers at LHW but I'd pick him vs Davis and Bader. Honestly though I think Chuck would have had problems if he'd fought in Pride during his peak years with besides Rampage, Shogun, Wanderlei, Lil Nog, Hendo, etc around.
 
TS needs to watch Rampage-Chuck 1 and say Chuck didn't have a chin.

He took some bombs in that fight.
 
Chuck is so underrated around here it's embarrassing.

I think he is rated just fine.. He was the most exciting fighter of his generation in the UFC.. But he is not someone who was ever going to walk through the best of his weight class had they all been together in their primes.
 
This isn't true not at all. I don't think he beats Jones, I think he loses to Cormier but I give him a shot vs anyone else at LHW
 
Yeah, but who did he beat? Rampage and Randy got him down. Beating Jeremy Horn, Babalu, and Vernon White is impressive and all, but I would put him as an underdog against anyone in the top 10.

Chuck doesn't actually have many physical gifts, and guys like him are being phased out of the sport. Glover would actually brutalize him for example. Maul him. Choke him unconscious.

You're an idiot. If you placed prime Chuck in today's game, it means he would train like today's fighters. Not to mention the guys he beat when he beat them were pretty damn good at the time. Chuck would be top five. Maybe not a title holder, but he'd be a monster.
 
Back
Top