The extra sentence, iirc, was "I'm sure that's gonna convince everyone to rally together behind the ol' stars n' stripes
".
You might be too dim and/or triggered to recognise that the US is currently vying for influence in several of the world's regions - most especially Asia and Africa. The extra sentence wasn't worth an additional post, but it supports the post I made by making the observation (however snarkily) that, with moves like this, the US is doing exactly the opposite of garnering positive influence. Stirring shit in Asia, with the top dog in the Pacific, is not going to rally nations behind America.
Now, do you have anything to say that's actually on topic, or are you just here to be baited by someone who's not even trying to bait anyone?
I assume that your selective quoting is the result of your being a troll with nothing to add to the topic?
Also, I have a habit of editing lines into my posts. Your assumption that it's a nefarious tactic is retarded and reflects poorly on you.