Law Cheers, Guv Gav for the happiness of California p******!

Lmao...you have 79k+ posts since you joined...and you're telling people to touch grass? You're my favorite little MAGAnadian.
Oh' it's my forever butt hurt stalker, LOL.

Have you figured out who was in the grassy knoll during Kirk's assassination yet?
 
Err...no.

Do you call your mother MAGA when she overcooks your chicken tendies?
Ironically my mother is a brain dead MAGA moron. She won't shut up about Trump her silver she bought. (I said Q, but she hasn't talked about Q in a couple of years actually).
 
No. Your stunted intelligence caused this. I'm sorry if you don't know how stupid you are, and take offense when people point it out.
Bro, let's face facts. You have almost 80k posts on a karate forum lol. How retarded is that shit? You actually care about your little persona of being a "MAGAnadian" and dedicate your time to pointlessly arguing with people online. It doesn't get more pathetic than that.
 
Bro, let's face facts. You have almost 80k posts on a karate forum lol. How retarded is that shit?
Oh', you struggle with math, too? Sheesh. Yeah, it's a real time consuming strain, taking a few seconds to post. Maybe it takes you a hefty amount of time to rub your two braincells together to make a post, to the point where you think 80,000 or so would take a lifetime to make, but most people can do this without straining themselves too much.

Don't let anyone tell you you're stupid, though. You try very hard and that's all that matters.
 
Oh', you struggle with math, too? Sheesh. Yeah, it's a real time consuming strain, taking a few seconds to post. Maybe it takes you a hefty amount of time to rub your two braincells together to make a post, to the point where you think 80,000 or so would take a lifetime to make, but most people can do this without straining themselves too much.

Don't let anyone tell you you're stupid, though. You try very hard and that's all that matters.
It doesn't take math to see your 80k posts or to see that I have 5.5k in 8 years. But it does reflect that you have a pathetic existence and desperately want to be relevant in an anonymous karate forum.
 
It doesn't take math to see your 80k posts or to see that I have 5.5k in 8 years.
I know. It's because you're slow. I mean, you're here every single day. You must just stare at posts all confused as to how to respond, until you manage to slowly single digit type some response.

Like I said, at least you try very hard. I'm proud of you.
 
I know. It's because you're slow. I mean, you're here every single day. You must just stare at posts all confused as to how to respond, until you manage to slowly single digit type some response.

Like I said, at least you try very hard. I'm proud of you.
Am I here everyday? You would fucking know lmao. Yea, I'm slow and I try hard, we get it. You've said it a few times now. Anything else before you go posting another few thousand times?
 
Am I here everyday?
Yes.
You would fucking know lmao.
Everybody knows.
Yea, I'm slow and I try hard, we get it.
I know "we" do, but I doubt you do.
You've said it a few times now.
Yeah, I know. That's how you get retards to understand.
Anything else before you go posting another few thousand times?
You're a dumbass who thinks Charlie Kirk was assassinated by Jews living underground. "Shalom gnomes", as they're commonly known as.
 
Yes.

Everybody knows.

I know "we" do, but I doubt you do.

Yeah, I know. That's how you get retards to understand.

You're a dumbass who thinks Charlie Kirk was assassinated by Jews living underground. "Shalom gnomes", as they're commonly known as.
Quote me saying Jews had anything to do with Kirk's murder. Don't worry, I'll wait.
lol. Is this true @BudKing8806? Were the golems not available?
Let's see what kind of evidence Heretic provides for his claim. I'll bet absolutely nothing.
 
What is it with you MAGA clowns and being unabashed, unashamed idiots? How do you proudly spout such fucking blatantly, patently untrue nonsense?

The primary driving factor in the decline in small bird populations in habitat loss. Full stop. Yes, cats are a factor in the decline of some bird populations, but there are other factors: pesticides killing off insect populations leading to food scarcity for some birds, climate change, WINDOW COLLISIONS.

Sure, maybe there a small number of bird species that are more vulnerable to cat predation, but the overall driving factor in the decline of bird populations is easily humans.
A. I'm not MAGA. It's just stupid to say that. No one who knows my posting around here thinks that. I don't get where the accusation comes from.

B. I'm not talking out of my ass, here. You seem to be, but I'm not. A small sampling of scholarly, peer reviewed sources from an earlier post:

You should:




 
A. I'm not MAGA. It's just stupid to say that. No one who knows my posting around here thinks that. I don't get where the accusation comes from.

B. I'm not talking out of my ass, here. You seem to be, but I'm not. A small sampling of scholarly, peer reviewed sources from an earlier post:
Those graphs don't include habitat loss which is the primary factor.
 
Nah, they get a bad rap. Sure they kill, but their impact on populations are usually overstated.


"There is general agreement that free-roaming cats can pose a significant risk to wildlife populations; however, the credible evidence is quite clear that this risk is limited to very specific contexts (e.g., small islands) and even then is likely only one part of a larger story. Sweeping claims that lack necessary context (e.g., conflating island and mainland environments) confuse the issue and impede productive conversation about how best to manage free-roaming cat populations"
I'm giving you peer reviewed scholarly articles. You're giving me an opinion piece by a cat advocacy group that uses numerous citations to put on the appearance of a scholarly article, but cites more sources against its hypothesis than for its hypothesis, and then just offers critiques of these sources and tries to pass that off as scholarship.

Look, I have little doubt that following cats around to estimate how many birds they are killing is a tall order, and that the data is messy. But same for the affects of pesticides or birds flying into windows. I teach on the third floor of my school, and have seen my share of birds hit the window. I've never had a researcher in a lab coat show up and write it down. But despite all of that, the overwhelming scientific consensus is that cats are the primary cause of population declines in song birds in North America.

I don't mind you holding the contrarian view on this, and I'm even willing to admit that the contrarian view might pan out to be the consensus view at some point in the future. It happens. But let's not go and pretend I'm the one who is putting forth the contrarian view in the moment. I simply presented the scientific consensus view, and some of you are acting like I'm presenting some sort of conspiratorial lunacy.
 
Back
Top