Social Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed

I honestly can’t take anything you say seriously if you think homeless/illegals should be able to set up shop in other people’s homes. Are you smoking crack? Even the bleeding heart Hollywood elites would balk at this lmao.
they wouldn't be other peoples houses. they would be the government's.
 
That obviously not true.
no it obviously is. you're just delusional.


 
no it obviously is. you're just delusional.


You said "every expert". I guess Yale and MIT researchers don't qualify as experts.
 
Nope sorry. This was his reply to people’s second or third homes and people’s houses that are for sale:

“right. so vacant homes.”

While they may be technically vacant they still belong to and are owned by someone else.
i don't care who they belong to or are "owned" by. landlords can get fucked.
 
You said "every expert". I guess Yale and MIT researchers don't qualify as experts.
they literally aren't experts. they're just random professors.

IMG-0880.jpg


ah yes, illegal immigration, a notable subsect of *checks notes* business management and engineering. hilarious how much credence you give people with any sort of higher education until they tell your goofy ass to get a vaccine.
 
No, almost all academic institutions lean left. It's an inherent quality of being liberal - having an open mind and willing to embrace change and learn new perspectives. This is why the more educated someone is, on average, the more they tend to lean left. Expanding your knowledge and awareness naturally creates a more liberal person.

Conservatives would rather look back through rose tinted glasses at the past, than come up with solutions for the present - isn't that what maga stands for? Returning to some mythical time when America was perfect? Before civil rights, before women could vote, before unions and child labor laws, before workplace safety regulation, environmental regulation, etc., etc etc. All you conservatives today take all of this for granted. Breathing clean air, not biting in to bread made with saw dust, not having to have your kids go to a school that was built over some type of a hazardous materials dump, I could go on all day. All of those things, and basically every facet of your life right now was brought about by protest and progressive, liberal thought. If conservatives truly had their way, you would be working in a company town for $1 a day, 7 days a week, 12 hours a day. If conservatives had their way, your boss could legally short you on your paycheck and you would be able to do nothing about it.

That's what education is. Obviously, someone who is more "conservative", is more anchored in tradition and resistant to change. Closed minds, in general, don't mix with endeavors that require accepting change.

Has nothing to do with "left leaning institutions" indoctrinating people. Liberals don't believe in hierarchies - conservatives make it a focal point of their entire ideology, after trickle down of course.
Intetesting theory... its flawed though.



In the 90s it was republicans more likely to be college educated......

College isnt viewed the same way nowadays As it was back then.

its literally the fact that women attend and graduate more now that altered the stats in recent years..


Women now earn more college degrees than men globally, a trend seen across many countries, with recent data showing women aged 25-34 in the U.S. at 47% with a bachelor's degree versus 37% of men, and similar patterns in Australia where women make up over 60% of graduates in recent years, reversing a historical male advantage in higher education


Voters with Degrees: In recent years, approximately 55% of voters with a bachelor's degree or more formal education align with the Democratic Party, while around 42% associate with the Republican Party.


All it is, is women are more liberal and go to college more now and graduate more. I mean... your version is a fun way to shit on conservatives Though.. just not rooted in logic or reality
 
Last edited:
they literally aren't experts. they're just random professors.

IMG-0880.jpg


ah yes, illegal immigration, a notable subsect of *checks notes* business management and engineering. hilarious how much credence you give people with any sort of higher education until they tell your goofy ass to get a vaccine.
They're all experts in statistical modeling and complex systems. Meanwhile the border data and over stays suggests far more entries than the 11 million that Pew kept consistent for like 2 decades.
 
Bud, you've been embarrassed and been called dumb by 800,000 people on this forum, calling me dumb repeatedly isn't gonna make it feel better, it's just overcompensating.

As long as you tell yourself its true then its your truth.

At least I dont get lost over conversation I initiated.


Also, bolded

You also left out this, curiously, which is the immediate next sentence out of one of your quotes:



It's what you don't mention that speaks the loudest

You mean you edited after I posted the exact exchange.

Ok. I'll let you slide on the stupid shit you posted because you forgot that you posted other stupid shit.
 
Sorry but I’ll be damned if I let a bunch of random unhoused people set up shop in my second home.
Because it's obviously not a serious discussion. Not even sure what the point is of nutbars trying to argue that the government should seize people's homes to give to illegals.


And it's not vacant.
You were just a few minutes too early before @KAZSoliloquy came in and blew that up, and admitted that yes, he does consider 2nd homes that people use seasonally to be "vacant", and should be seized by the government and given to illegals.

I say we start with Bernie Sanders and Laticia James and confiscate all of their properties to move hobos and illegals into.
 
As long as you tell yourself its true then its your truth.

At least I dont get lost over conversation I initiated.




You mean you edited after I posted the exact exchange.

Ok. I'll let you slide on the stupid shit you posted because you forgot that you posted other stupid shit.
I edited before you responded

I also got lost cuz I ain't paying full attention and don't take,you cereally and you are legendarily dumb so it's pretty easy to believe you'd post dumb shit
 
so about 0.1% of jews believe in life at conception. that solves it!

The rest take it from the Talmud - much later than the Torah. Even later than Christ.

again, you're floundering. the overwhelming majority of jews do not believe in life at conception. i guess they're just dumb? they don't see how obvious the teachings from the OT are?

We're discussing originalism. I asked you to cite a source that questions it before the year 400. You have yet to produce 1.


LOL. you just quoted someone else using the word "reinstituted". with no evidence it was ever "instituted" in the first place.

While I do hate appeals to authority, he is an academic scholar of Catholic history.


you're entitled to your belief. you're not entitled to insist the bible makes it clear. since entire religions based upon the OT don't share that view. if scripture made this point absolutely clear there would be no varying viewpoints. you're trying to insist jews are just dumb. they can't follow what you have deemed to be clear (and again, a large % of christians agreed - and many still do today. the catholic church notwithstanding).

You purposely asked my belief.


the verse is specific to jeremiah for 1. and for 2, god is supposed to be all knowing. god knows everything that happened or will happen. again, it's saying god knew jeremiah BEFORE he was ever even conceived (and that he was going to be a prophet). do you think it's clear, therefore, that life begins BEFORE conception? i mean, if you want to interpret the passage literally that's what you believe.

Ok, so only Jeremiah had a soul at conception?

Isaiah: "The Lord called me before my birth, from within the womb he called my name"

Psalms: "Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in Your book were written all of my days, when as yet there was none of them.

Galations: "But when he had set me apart before I was born"


The verse didnt say I knew you would be born and that I knew your future. The verse said God knew him.

I suppose you will argue that those verses don't mean the child had a soul, but remember you started this convo defending abortion.
 
Back
Top