- Joined
- Dec 2, 2009
- Messages
- 11,221
- Reaction score
- 9,614
My place is great. No complaints here!
Why don’t you help alleviate the crisis and let some live with you!
My place is great. No complaints here!
Have you not noticed that there is a housing crisis because the market is broken?
And you sound like a parasite
I live in an apartment. I suppose I could accommodate a very neat roommate, but I don't wanna.Why don’t you help alleviate the crisis and let some live with you!
You should get out of real estate. It's an inherently predatory industry.So I should leave money on the table and sell it a discount?
And it's not vacant.if i own a second home, i'm not a landlord nor a bank.
they wouldn't be other peoples houses. they would be the government's.I honestly can’t take anything you say seriously if you think homeless/illegals should be able to set up shop in other people’s homes. Are you smoking crack? Even the bleeding heart Hollywood elites would balk at this lmao.
no it obviously is. you're just delusional.That obviously not true.
You said "every expert". I guess Yale and MIT researchers don't qualify as experts.no it obviously is. you're just delusional.
![]()
U.S. Unauthorized Immigrant Population Reached a Record 14 Million in 2023
The number of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. reached an all-time high after two consecutive years of record growth.www.pewresearch.org
![]()
The Unauthorized Immigrant Population Expands amid Record U.S.-Mexico Border Arrivals
The U.S. unauthorized immigrant population stood at 13.7 million as of mid-2023. The result of strong U.S. economic recovery from the pandemic and displacement in Latin America, the increase in the size of the unauthorized population is accompanied by a diversifying makeup in nationalities. As...www.migrationpolicy.org
i don't care who they belong to or are "owned" by. landlords can get fucked.Nope sorry. This was his reply to people’s second or third homes and people’s houses that are for sale:
“right. so vacant homes.”
While they may be technically vacant they still belong to and are owned by someone else.
they literally aren't experts. they're just random professors.You said "every expert". I guess Yale and MIT researchers don't qualify as experts.
i don't care who they belong to or are "owned" by. landlords can get fucked.
Intetesting theory... its flawed though.No, almost all academic institutions lean left. It's an inherent quality of being liberal - having an open mind and willing to embrace change and learn new perspectives. This is why the more educated someone is, on average, the more they tend to lean left. Expanding your knowledge and awareness naturally creates a more liberal person.
Conservatives would rather look back through rose tinted glasses at the past, than come up with solutions for the present - isn't that what maga stands for? Returning to some mythical time when America was perfect? Before civil rights, before women could vote, before unions and child labor laws, before workplace safety regulation, environmental regulation, etc., etc etc. All you conservatives today take all of this for granted. Breathing clean air, not biting in to bread made with saw dust, not having to have your kids go to a school that was built over some type of a hazardous materials dump, I could go on all day. All of those things, and basically every facet of your life right now was brought about by protest and progressive, liberal thought. If conservatives truly had their way, you would be working in a company town for $1 a day, 7 days a week, 12 hours a day. If conservatives had their way, your boss could legally short you on your paycheck and you would be able to do nothing about it.
That's what education is. Obviously, someone who is more "conservative", is more anchored in tradition and resistant to change. Closed minds, in general, don't mix with endeavors that require accepting change.
Has nothing to do with "left leaning institutions" indoctrinating people. Liberals don't believe in hierarchies - conservatives make it a focal point of their entire ideology, after trickle down of course.
They're all experts in statistical modeling and complex systems. Meanwhile the border data and over stays suggests far more entries than the 11 million that Pew kept consistent for like 2 decades.they literally aren't experts. they're just random professors.
![]()
ah yes, illegal immigration, a notable subsect of *checks notes* business management and engineering. hilarious how much credence you give people with any sort of higher education until they tell your goofy ass to get a vaccine.
Absolute blithering nonsense.Liberals don't believe in hierarchies - conservatives make it a focal point of their entire ideology, after trickle down of course.
Bud, you've been embarrassed and been called dumb by 800,000 people on this forum, calling me dumb repeatedly isn't gonna make it feel better, it's just overcompensating.
Also, bolded
You also left out this, curiously, which is the immediate next sentence out of one of your quotes:
It's what you don't mention that speaks the loudest
Nah, not really. He's been forgotten, just like in real life.Is this thread still about Charlie Kirk?
Because it's obviously not a serious discussion. Not even sure what the point is of nutbars trying to argue that the government should seize people's homes to give to illegals.Sorry but I’ll be damned if I let a bunch of random unhoused people set up shop in my second home.
You were just a few minutes too early before @KAZSoliloquy came in and blew that up, and admitted that yes, he does consider 2nd homes that people use seasonally to be "vacant", and should be seized by the government and given to illegals.And it's not vacant.
I edited before you respondedAs long as you tell yourself its true then its your truth.
At least I dont get lost over conversation I initiated.
You mean you edited after I posted the exact exchange.
Ok. I'll let you slide on the stupid shit you posted because you forgot that you posted other stupid shit.
so about 0.1% of jews believe in life at conception. that solves it!
again, you're floundering. the overwhelming majority of jews do not believe in life at conception. i guess they're just dumb? they don't see how obvious the teachings from the OT are?
LOL. you just quoted someone else using the word "reinstituted". with no evidence it was ever "instituted" in the first place.
you're entitled to your belief. you're not entitled to insist the bible makes it clear. since entire religions based upon the OT don't share that view. if scripture made this point absolutely clear there would be no varying viewpoints. you're trying to insist jews are just dumb. they can't follow what you have deemed to be clear (and again, a large % of christians agreed - and many still do today. the catholic church notwithstanding).
the verse is specific to jeremiah for 1. and for 2, god is supposed to be all knowing. god knows everything that happened or will happen. again, it's saying god knew jeremiah BEFORE he was ever even conceived (and that he was going to be a prophet). do you think it's clear, therefore, that life begins BEFORE conception? i mean, if you want to interpret the passage literally that's what you believe.