Social Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed

My wife's classroom currently has a hole in the ceiling requiring two large garbage cans to catch the leak. Has been there for 2 years.

The schools do not have the funding to hire a bunch of armed guards lol. They don't even have the funds to pay teachers a non-bullshit wage for the work they're doing already.

Charlie Kirk supported cutting funds to public schools. So according to him, they're supposed to take funding cuts, and hire armed guards to walk around the schools at the same time?

Ironically, after he died, several Republicans introduced a bill to cut education funding and named it after Charlie Kirk lol.

Pic or I'm calling bs on the hole.

Local law enforcement (already paid by local govr) are the school resource officers in my area. It isn't paid for by the schools.

Oh and:
The proposed “CHARLIE Act,” short for “Countering Hate and Revolutionary Leftist Indoctrination in Education,” prohibits “purposeful division, dialectical worldviews, critical consciousness or anti-Constitutional indoctrination” in K-12 public schools in the state, according to the bill’s draft language.
 
Last edited:
<23>
I wasn't going to respond to you but I scrolled down the thread and saw someone else did and saw this quote from you so I scrolled up till I found it.

hq720.jpg



A noose seen hanging from a gallows outside the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection is in the custody of federal agents.

As rioters bludgeoned, beat and berated police inside the Capitol and out, a gallows with a bright orange noose was erected as marauders screamed, “Hang Mike Pence.”




You ever get tired of embarrassing yourself?


Do you think that gallow was transported on the same few busses that TPUSA sent?

I know you're dumb, but that discussion you are quoting is specifically about TPUSA sending busses to J6 rally.

I know you aren't very bright, but the whole point of the bus trip was to attend the rally; not hang Mike Pence you dunce.

Where there violent people in DC that day calling for people's heads? Yes. Did they ride there on a TPUSA bus? Evidently 1 out of over 100 riders did.

Do you ever get tired of embarrassing yourself?

Next time you wwant to chime in, go up the basement stairs and ask mommy and daddy if what you're about to say is stupid.
 
Do you think that gallow was transported on the same few busses that TPUSA sent?

I know you're dumb, but that discussion you are quoting is specifically about TPUSA sending busses to J6 rally.

I know you aren't very bright, but the whole point of the bus trip was to attend the rally; not hang Mike Pence you dunce.

Where there violent people in DC that day calling for people's heads? Yes. Did they ride there on a TPUSA bus? Evidently 1 out of over 100 riders did.

Do you ever get tired of embarrassing yourself?

Next time you wwant to chime in, go up the basement stairs and ask mommy and daddy if what you're about to say is stupid.
Why are you talking about buses. Show everyone where a said the gallows was transported on a bus and call me stupid a few more times lmao

Edit: My apologies, I looked back and saw the rest of what you said that people at the rally called for Pence to be hung. Regardless, my initial post that you were originally responding to stands
 
They don’t work to stop a mass shooter.. I know you understand the distinction right? I’ve qualified that statement every time from the beginning

Are you going to start wasting my time now with bad faith arguments?

Real question: do gun bans prevent all mass shootings?

And if the do why arent we banning cars?
 
Why are you talking about buses. Show everyone where a said the gallows was transported on a bus and call me stupid a few more times lmao


I'll remind you why I'm talking about busses since you seemed go be a bit slow:
.... never mind bussing people to the capital on J6.
And oh my, he bused people to a political rally - the horror. Good thing he wasn't posting bail for people rioting - that would qualify him to run for potus in the democrat party.
I'm not doing the repeating myself merry-go-round and call for =/= condone. That "political rally" was a dog whistle for violence with people calling for the hanging of Mike Pence and you know what transpired.
They didnt go there to call for Pence to be hung. He sent a bus for a rally. People at the rally started calling for Pence to be hung.

Read this and you won't keep making the same mistakes:
If you want to ask anything else, go up the basement stairs and ask mommy and daddy if what you're about yo ask makes you look stupid.
 
Weird that gun control works pretty well everywhere that they have actually tried it.

Metal detectors in schools are only an American thing, and they don't appear to be working particularly well.
Metal dectators arent just a american thing.

Following the tragic murder or 15-year-old Elianne Andam, Mayor Sadiq Khan has taken another step in the fight against knife crime by offering all 500 secondary schools in London handheld metal detectors and other resources to screen pupils for weapons.14 Nov 2023


Jamacia. Malasia. Costa rica also.
 
I'll remind you why I'm talking about busses since you seemed go be a bit slow:





Read this and you won't keep making the same mistakes:
If you want to ask anything else, go up the basement stairs and ask mommy and daddy if what you're about yo ask makes you look stupid.
Bud, you've been embarrassed and been called dumb by 800,000 people on this forum, calling me dumb repeatedly isn't gonna make it feel better, it's just overcompensating.

Also, bolded
Why are you talking about buses. Show everyone where a said the gallows was transported on a bus and call me stupid a few more times lmao

Edit: My apologies, I looked back and saw the rest of what you said that people at the rally called for Pence to be hung. Regardless, my initial post that you were originally responding to stands
You also left out this, curiously, which is the immediate next sentence out of one of your quotes:

Maybe he expressed regret for doing so, I dunno. I suspect not. I know enough about him, regardless.

It's what you don't mention that speaks the loudest
 
And that's why people are done wasting their time with you. The clip, and a few articles, of Kirks dismissal of doing anything to prevent children from getting shot, has been posted several times. I'll even help you out with the stock trumper rebuttal: It didn't count because he was really talking about how awesome the 2nd Amendment was.

Listen kid, you keep doing the same thing with each an every quote of Kirks. You take the most generous interpretation of it, and demand the rest of us adopt the same retarded right-wing spin. If we don't, you start screeching "show me where he said that!" We post the same clip, and you go right back to lying about any context.

And considering you have no problem here accusing each an everyone of us of believing things we've never said (one of your comments to me right before this, was that I secretly want to confiscate all guns), no one cares.
So, that's two things I've asked you to source and you haven't done it. Just deferred to others. Watching your all bark, no bite style of posting is boring, especially when you continue to lie and then intentionally avoid answering any direct questions. I posted a video of Kirk contradicting your words and you somehow think avoiding it and just insisting your claims are the correct ones because "others have posted it!" is some kind of rebuttal. We're done here, Lawyer Boy.

The post you responded to did not only mention that case, it also mentioned:

I guess you can nitpick it by saying he didn't mention kids specifically, only the buildings collapsed on top of them.

But given such crass jokes by Kirk, are you truly surprised people would return the favor?
No it didn't, if you go all the way back to the first post I responded to. That's not what I've been asking for a source for.
 
So, that's two things I've asked you to source and you haven't done it.

Sure have. Done it several times and even reminded you of why you dismissed each time.

Tell you what, let me try arguing the way you have. Ready, here goes: Every example you gave where you whined about people making fun of Kirk, was actually a joke. They were talking about something else. If you don't believe me, then you have to give me a quote that says exactly, "I, [state your name] hereby formally declare that I hate Charlie Kirk." Find me that exact quote. I won't respond until I get that exact quote.

This is the way you argued in the Ghislaine thread (I know you get butthurt whenever we remind you of your positions, but deal with it.) People pointed out that you support Ghislaine. You would cry, "Show me a time where I said 'I support Ghislaine!", only to have people point out a dozen posts where you defend her getting moved to a cushy prison on the basis that you think she's actually helping the trump administration get to the bottom of the Epstein case. When people pointed out that this position means you support Ghislaine (because you do, in fact, 100% support her getting that prison move), you play dumb and yell, "But I never specifically said............"

It's a really dumb way in which you trump supporters both follow every little thing daddy tells you to do, while playing dumb about what you're pushing. It's boring, immature, and on full display in this thread.

Which is why, I could, for the tenth time direct you back to Kirk's comments about the US not doing anything to stop school shootings, because it's just not worth it. I could explain to you, how this means Kirk doesn't give a shit about kids getting shot. Then we can all watch you play dumb while screeching, "But that's not him saying 'I don't care about kids."

But none of us are obligated to argue in such a selectively literal, and stupid, way. Especially not to a some kid who has no problem putting words in our mouths.
 
Kariate Jews believe life begins at conception. The Bible says God knew you before he knit you in the womb. Etc.



You mean the same church that created graven images, call priest Father, venerated saints, call for priest to be celebate, and sold infulgences - all things opposite of the Bible - decided for a few hundred years that life didn't begin at conception is some sort proof that the Bible isnt clear.

<YeahOKJen>




And what do Kariate Jews believe? What did Judah ha-Nasi teach in the Mishna?
so about 0.1% of jews believe in life at conception. that solves it!

again, you're floundering. the overwhelming majority of jews do not believe in life at conception. i guess they're just dumb? they don't see how obvious the teachings from the OT are?



Its weird that you ignore the Cathoic churches on statements on the matter:



-The Catholic Church maintains its consistent teaching that abortion is a grave moral evil, unchanged since the first century, condemning direct abortion as contrary to moral law.


- The exact time when the fetus becomes “animated” has no practical significance as far as the morality of abortion is concerned. By any theory of “animation,” abortion is gravely wrong. Why so? Because every direct abortion is a sin of murder by intent.


And you ignore your own argument in your favor:

  • Although Catholic teaching on abortion has shifted through the centuries, the current position is clear: abortion is murder. This position has been fixed since 1869, when Pope Pius IX REINSTITUTED the doctrine that the soul enters the body at the moment of conception
That little word mean that it was the position at some previous time.
LOL. you just quoted someone else using the word "reinstituted". with no evidence it was ever "instituted" in the first place.
I think that LIFE as we are discussing it begins at conception.
you're entitled to your belief. you're not entitled to insist the bible makes it clear. since entire religions based upon the OT don't share that view. if scripture made this point absolutely clear there would be no varying viewpoints. you're trying to insist jews are just dumb. they can't follow what you have deemed to be clear (and again, a large % of christians agreed - and many still do today. the catholic church notwithstanding).
And that God knew us and his plans for us before he created us. (What the verse says). If that means he knew our soul or that LIFE is even more than we can comprehend I'm not sure.
the verse is specific to jeremiah for 1. and for 2, god is supposed to be all knowing. god knows everything that happened or will happen. again, it's saying god knew jeremiah BEFORE he was ever even conceived (and that he was going to be a prophet). do you think it's clear, therefore, that life begins BEFORE conception? i mean, if you want to interpret the passage literally that's what you believe.
 
No it didn't, if you go all the way back to the first post I responded to. That's not what I've been asking for a source for.
Maybe not in the first post but in that subsequent post he did and anyway I think that video proves the point that Kirk himself was insensitive about rather sensitive matters. Doesn't justify him being murdered of course but it justifies the dark humor at his expense.
 
My wife's classroom currently has a hole in the ceiling requiring two large garbage cans to catch the leak. Has been there for 2 years.

The schools do not have the funding to hire a bunch of armed guards lol. They don't even have the funds to pay teachers a non-bullshit wage for the work they're doing already.
<{fry}>


The school district doesn't have maintenance personnel and a budget for repairs?
 
Well I’m a human and I’ve gone through metal detectors and had to be frisked. Didn’t enjoy it. So now I’ve provided and equal amount of argument, share your source or shut the fuck up.
No, retard. That's not how this works. You cited "studies" in an attempt to back up your claim that metal detectors traumatize people. It's on you to provide those sources. If not, people are safe to assume that you're full of shit.

I, on the other hand, have not cited any studies, and merely have explained a metal detector's purpose, and why it would be helpful in schools, given their purpose. I have nothing to prove. My opinion in based on observation of metal detectors working in airports, court houses, etc, in keeping weapons made of metal out of buildings. That's what my opinion is based on. Metal detectors work. That's it.

Do you follow, or would like me to whip up some pictures for you in MS Paint, so can follow along?

We all know why you won't post your supposed "studies", though. You're either A)misrepresenting the studies you're citing, which will be exposed if you post them, or B) you're talking out of your ass, and think if you just say "Studies say so. Google it" people are just supposed to accept it, or C) your source is so embarrassing, that even you won't post them as evidence of anything, because you know they'll be picked apart and mocked.

Until you provide these "sources" for these "studies", it's safe to assume that you're completely full of shit. Even your fellow lefty explained this very simple concept to you.
 
Maybe not in the first post but in that subsequent post he did and anyway I think that video proves the point that Kirk himself was insensitive about rather sensitive matters. Doesn't justify him being murdered of course but it justifies the dark humor at his expense.
I don't care about the subsequent posts. My question existed before that.
 
No, retard. That's not how this works. You cited "studies" in an attempt to back up your claim that metal detectors traumatize people. It's on you to provide those sources. If not, people are safe to assume that you're full of shit.

I, on the other hand, have not cited any studies, and merely have explained a metal detector's purpose, and why it would be helpful in schools, given their purpose. I have nothing to prove. My opinion in based on observation of metal detectors working in airports, court houses, etc, in keeping weapons made of metal out of buildings. That's what my opinion is based on. Metal detectors work. That's it.

Do you follow, or would like me to whip up some pictures for you in MS Paint, so can follow along?

We all know why you won't post your supposed "studies", though. You're either A)misrepresenting the studies you're citing, which will be exposed if you post them, or B) you're talking out of your ass, and think if you just say "Studies say so. Google it" people are just supposed to accept it, or C) your source is so embarrassing, that even you won't post them as evidence of anything, because you know they'll be picked apart and mocked.

Until you provide these "sources" for these "studies", it's safe to assume that you're completely full of shit. Even your fellow lefty explained this very simple concept to you.
Here’s a hint turd- most of the time I make a claim like that on here I do a quick google to double check and make sure I’m not misremembering. So this is something I’ve known about for a while but I bothered to verify it first. Now why don’t you put in at least the minimum amount of work in your end and show us that you have at least a few working dendrites still firing up there.
 
Here’s a hint turd- most of the time I make a claim like that on here I do a quick google to double check and make sure I’m not misremembering. So this is something I’ve known about for a while but I bothered to verify it first. Now why don’t you put in at least the minimum amount of work in your end and show us that you have at least a few working dendrites still firing up there.
You alluded to studies. Put up or shut up
 
Back
Top