- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
- Messages
- 25,901
- Reaction score
- 23,474
If cops are going to sit around with their thumbs up their ass for 45 minutes then what are some volunteers going to do? Who is liable if the volunteer fucks up and shoots someone who doesn’t have a gun? Or sprays and prays and hits innocent people as they’re shooting at the bad guy? Or if a teacher/vollunteer has a weapon stolen bc they weren’t storing it correctly?
Not all people are created equal and parents have skin in the game here. Also ulvade seems to be the odd man out and it looks to me like people and cops engage shooters when need arises in a lot of cases. You can set a standard of training required for this ya know
A person is always responsible for what they do with their gun. Worst case you will be judged in if what you did was reasonable. I'm assuming whatever the fuck happened to get a gun pointed at a person is super serious and if it's not weapons shouldn't be drawn. Again you can set standards of training in what is and isn't a threat and train to that standard.
The criminal is responsible for causing the crossfire. It's also super odd to me that it seems more people worry bout crossfire than a lunatic having free time to operate unchallenged. Ulvade Virginia tech and columbine could have used a little crossfire , ya know ?
I don't understand how a weapon that is on your person gets stolen unless deliberately attacked in an attempt to get said weapon. In which case said person should be treated as an extreme threat/shooter. You don't take it off if you carry at school seems a simple enough rule to follow. If it's not in a holster or on a sling attached to you it's not properly stored.