- Joined
- Feb 25, 2008
- Messages
- 24,023
- Reaction score
- 26,062
Uh, no it's not a "loophole." The threshold for claiming that somebody is factually a child abuser should require indisputable evidence, don't you think? That's a pretty serious accusation. You believe whatever Bluesky tells you to believe but think that asking for indisputable proof is somehow a denial tactic? This is exactly why the Epstein thread is basically now just a leftist circlejerk meme thread."indisputable" is there loophole.
