- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 62,122
- Reaction score
- 43,390
Nobody even knows if this is true, let alone who the perpetrator is.
It's been confirmed by credible news outlets and the suspect is in custody, so you're wrong twice.
Nobody even knows if this is true, let alone who the perpetrator is.
Dang, guess it is.![]()
Charlie Kirk shot in Utah: Live updates
Charlie Kirk was shot near the neck during a student Q&A at Utah Valley University, it confirmed to Newsweek. Follow Newsweek's live blog.www.newsweek.com
It likely is true, several outlets have reported this.
When words and expression are equated to violence... this is the result. Hope he is ok. Looks like they got the guy.
Reading comprehension is key. Never said it wasn't true, all i said was we didn't know for sure. And i was correct.It's been confirmed by credible news outlets and the suspect is in custody, so you're wrong twice.
It should be harder for them to get their hands on guns!These leftwing lunatics are truly getting out of hand. Something has to be done.
From the vid it looked like a chest shot, but with AI these days you never know. Waiting for confirmation.
Who the fuck would believe anything that account says LOL
Calling BS,.
Reading comprehension is key. Never said it wasn't true, all i said was we didn't know for sure. And i was correct.
Conservative commentator. Has a podcast etc. Travels to college campuses to discuss and debateI'm not joking: who is Charlie Kirk?
There you are!These leftwing lunatics are truly getting out of hand. Something has to be done.
I read the neck. Def he was shot. Its all over the news.From the vid it looked like a chest shot, but with AI these days you never know. Waiting for confirmation.
I'm not joking: who is Charlie Kirk?
it was that damned Palestinian chickenLarry David’s been radicalized
It's everywhere right now. It's legit. The fact that his condition isn't being released it's probably grim.Who the fuck would believe anything that account says LOL
Calling BS,.
Didn't know at the time i said it.But we do know both things for sure, so that means you're objectively incorrect.