- Joined
- Oct 3, 2009
- Messages
- 5,712
- Reaction score
- 7,043
HahahahahahahahaAn ex gang leader who spent many years in prison who has broke out of the brain rott of wokeism and expresses rage at the Democratic party for enabling black gangs and now spits vitriol at all gang members and the political party that spreads this cancer in this country...
In other words he is a once perfect example of how "racist America is" but is now designated to being called a moron for actually standing up for his community

What makes people go off like this. Wtf.
Sure but I can link you to numerous black people who say the same shit. The black Hebrews, Louis Farrakhan, the nation of Islam, black people who call themselves kings.Hahahahahahahaha
Edit: @Saye_mc I see you liked this post, in fairness I feel I should let you know I'm laughing at you not with you mate. Imagine seeing the disgusting rant above and putting it through the lens of 'but he's antidemocrat and antiwoke so this rant was him being "designated" to be called a moron.
![]()
An ex gang leader who spent many years in prison who has broke out of the brain rott of wokeism and expresses rage at the Democratic party for enabling black gangs and now spits vitriol at all gang members and the political party that spreads this cancer in this country...
In other words he is a once perfect example of how "racist America is" but is now designated to being called a moron for actually standing up for his community
He speaks just enough "truth" to gain a following only to immediately lead that group into one of the preplanned psyops set up for them. Its a playbook.
Charleston White is someone who instigates conflict between blacks and asians all the while promoting harsh prison sentences for blacks among other things. But he calls out BLM so it gives him credibility with certain demographics.
he also calls out his black community for celebrating known killers like king von and little durk.
he also calls out his black community for celebrating known killers like king von and little durk.
And he is right, his community will never rise from the mire they find themselves in if their role models are vice Lords and GDS who murder their own kind
He's an agent provocateur. Its his job to get on the internet, say crazy things, and influence the minds of impressionable people under the guise of being someone who "tells it like it is" type of character.
i agree I think it's stupid to hold a tbone Infront of a hungry dog... I won't nor can argue against thatYes, he "tells it like it is" when it comes to street gangs and people like King Von. I agree with that. The problem is that he then turns around and dares those same GDs to come to Texas and get him they're really gangstas. He calls them out for not responding and retaliating for King Vons murder. He praises the Crips for killing white people in response to Nipsy's muder. At the end of the day he promotes the same gang violence, street codes, and ghetto nonsense he's supposed to be against. He also wishes death and r*pe on the children of those he has internet beef with. He's a completely messed up individual.
So again, he speaks just enough truth to gain credibility and influence with certain demographics like yourself. He then uses that credibility and influence to turn around and push the same mindset and behaviors he supposed to be against. He pushes reverse racism against whites and asians. He promotes street violence in his own petty internet beefs. He threatens people. He wishes harm on children. He speaks hatred. He dares street gangs to go shoot people to prove they're 'real gangstas'. On top of that he promotes overall ghetto culture and black redneckary. But hey sometimes he calls out blm and gang members so you ignore everything else. You're under mind control.
Read this carefully and see of sinks in: He is an agent provocateur who gets promoted and paid to do this nonsense.
You know, I'm beating a dead horse with this, but every once in a while when I see this douchenozzle come in with the "Your personal attacks just show that you aren't willing to discuss the issue - checkmate!" I want everyone to remember how invested this guy is in avoiding those nasty personal attacks in his own rhetoric. He comes into a thread and will, while targeting specific people, broadly, say that "conservatives are smashing education into paste," accuse people that they "don't care about the truth and care only about towing the party line. You have no interest in honest dialogue, and saw what you considered a "gotcha" as your escape hatch." This is in the thread about the so-called "Don't say gay bill" where this absolute mouthbreather didn't even realize that he had been utterly mislead by BS partisan talking points and took it upon himself to come in and smear not just posters in there but their whole political persuasion based on his own mistake... Then how does he finish off? Not "Shit - I really got this one wrong. Guys, sorry, you're right, I'm wrong - I obviously don't understand what's going on since I didn't even know that all the headlines that form my opinions on politics were outright lying to me." Nope - he says this:
"I called it what a lot of people are calling it, and explained why.
You're focusing on this because you know you can't address the points I raised, and it's a bit disappointing you didn't even try. You're using Shapiro's "make sure you frame the argument" tactic, and it isn't used by people who are honest when discussing important issues.
I give everyone a chance to prove me wrong and some people actually do it. They change my mind, because I don't know everything. You've even seen it happen."
This guy literally came into a thread where he didn't know what the fuck was going on, got blatantly exposed that he didn't know, then finishes off with "Well, you just can't address my points" and spends pages upon pages accusing people of hiding, of falling for Conservative propaganda, after it was made blatantly clear that this guy doesn't tend to actually look beyond headlines on anti-conservative stuff himself. His bloody MO is to come into a thread, treat everyone like they're no-mind partisan hacks, be exactly that himself, and then spend half the time accusing people of being stupid or dodging him while he gets upset that people call him names. He sets the rhetorical bar in the bloody sewer and then gets pissy when people argue at the level he has set it at.
The lack of self reflection behind this guy's partisan bloviation is mind boggling. Shit, it wasn't long ago when some Project Veritas thing came out and he came in and more or less said that you could ignore everything that came out of PV because they had done bad things in their past. His exact words about them were:
"They've lied and deceived too many times to ever be given the benefit of the doubt, and they've done a lot of damage over the years."
Later on, I came in did - again, this dead-horse beating routine of "Here's all the ways you've been a partisan hack" with the intimation being that because he's been so full of shit in the past nobody should give him the benefit of the doubt. I felt like testing his self awareness, to see if he would make the connection that in a thread where he was arguing "These people have been partisan in the past, so we can completely ignore them, without consideration, now" he would realize that I'm pointing out what a partisan shitbag he has been in the past and was saying, about him, that "this person has been such a partisan hack in the past that we can completely ignore him, without consideration, now." It went right over his fucking head, and he actually got quite upset about it, waxing on and on about how he REALLY has black friends and how he's an old soul or some such shit.
This poster, @Loiosh , is the picture of a partisan dirtbag who will come in with political opinions that are a collage of legacy news headlines, call people names, use all sort of shitty anecdotal evidence "I have black friends! I have Trump supporting friends!" and then get pissy when someone doesn't treat him like a serious person. He is more than happy to judge people based on their past performance, but gets pissy about it when he gets held to that standard. He's like Biden, making up a new way his son dies to appeal to every tough audience he has. He's the second most notable lying shitbag in this forum but, unlike the #1, he's not that smart.
Luckily, he has me blocked, so he won't have to suffer through me calling him all these dastardly names. You have my blocked - like you said you did - right @Loiosh ?
Anyway, there is reminder number fifteen of Loiosh's "true character." He's in his "squid-ink-cloud" word wall defense phase now, so buckle in people.
Serious message to @Loiosh - take a step back man. You create this. Every bloody time. It's the stick-up your ass, I know best, "I'm an old soul" routine backed with the fact that you tend to come into things relatively poorly informed that gets everyone so pissy with you. You're basically a raw-nerve or partisan energy, and all that stuff you get back that you don't like? You are setting that tone. You've spent years setting it. Have some god damned self awareness dude!
You know, I'm beating a dead horse with this, but every once in a while when I see this douchenozzle come in with the "Your personal attacks just show that you aren't willing to discuss the issue - checkmate!" I want everyone to remember how invested this guy is in avoiding those nasty personal attacks in his own rhetoric. He comes into a thread and will, while targeting specific people, broadly, say that "conservatives are smashing education into paste," accuse people that they "don't care about the truth and care only about towing the party line. You have no interest in honest dialogue, and saw what you considered a "gotcha" as your escape hatch." This is in the thread about the so-called "Don't say gay bill" where this absolute mouthbreather didn't even realize that he had been utterly mislead by BS partisan talking points and took it upon himself to come in and smear not just posters in there but their whole political persuasion based on his own mistake... Then how does he finish off? Not "Shit - I really got this one wrong. Guys, sorry, you're right, I'm wrong - I obviously don't understand what's going on since I didn't even know that all the headlines that form my opinions on politics were outright lying to me." Nope - he says this:
"I called it what a lot of people are calling it, and explained why.
You're focusing on this because you know you can't address the points I raised, and it's a bit disappointing you didn't even try. You're using Shapiro's "make sure you frame the argument" tactic, and it isn't used by people who are honest when discussing important issues.
I give everyone a chance to prove me wrong and some people actually do it. They change my mind, because I don't know everything. You've even seen it happen."
This guy literally came into a thread where he didn't know what the fuck was going on, got blatantly exposed that he didn't know, then finishes off with "Well, you just can't address my points" and spends pages upon pages accusing people of hiding, of falling for Conservative propaganda, after it was made blatantly clear that this guy doesn't tend to actually look beyond headlines on anti-conservative stuff himself. His bloody MO is to come into a thread, treat everyone like they're no-mind partisan hacks, be exactly that himself, and then spend half the time accusing people of being stupid or dodging him while he gets upset that people call him names. He sets the rhetorical bar in the bloody sewer and then gets pissy when people argue at the level he has set it at.
The lack of self reflection behind this guy's partisan bloviation is mind boggling. Shit, it wasn't long ago when some Project Veritas thing came out and he came in and more or less said that you could ignore everything that came out of PV because they had done bad things in their past. His exact words about them were:
"They've lied and deceived too many times to ever be given the benefit of the doubt, and they've done a lot of damage over the years."
Later on, I came in did - again, this dead-horse beating routine of "Here's all the ways you've been a partisan hack" with the intimation being that because he's been so full of shit in the past nobody should give him the benefit of the doubt. I felt like testing his self awareness, to see if he would make the connection that in a thread where he was arguing "These people have been partisan in the past, so we can completely ignore them, without consideration, now" he would realize that I'm pointing out what a partisan shitbag he has been in the past and was saying, about him, that "this person has been such a partisan hack in the past that we can completely ignore him, without consideration, now." It went right over his fucking head, and he actually got quite upset about it, waxing on and on about how he REALLY has black friends and how he's an old soul or some such shit.
This poster, @Loiosh , is the picture of a partisan dirtbag who will come in with political opinions that are a collage of legacy news headlines, call people names, use all sort of shitty anecdotal evidence "I have black friends! I have Trump supporting friends!" and then get pissy when someone doesn't treat him like a serious person. He is more than happy to judge people based on their past performance, but gets pissy about it when he gets held to that standard. He's like Biden, making up a new way his son dies to appeal to every tough audience he has. He's the second most notable lying shitbag in this forum but, unlike the #1, he's not that smart.
Luckily, he has me blocked, so he won't have to suffer through me calling him all these dastardly names. You have my blocked - like you said you did - right @Loiosh ?
Anyway, there is reminder number fifteen of Loiosh's "true character." He's in his "squid-ink-cloud" word wall defense phase now, so buckle in people.
Serious message to @Loiosh - take a step back man. You create this. Every bloody time. It's the stick-up your ass, I know best, "I'm an old soul" routine backed with the fact that you tend to come into things relatively poorly informed that gets everyone so pissy with you. You're basically a raw-nerve or partisan energy, and all that stuff you get back that you don't like? You are setting that tone. You've spent years setting it. Have some god damned self awareness dude!

What makes people go off like this. Wtf.
Reading is gayJfc guys, can we start using spoilers
Not everyone has had a chance to read those books yet
Racism - treating people differently based on their skin colourQuixote was initially considered delusional, but the book wrestles with the question of whether it's better to see the world as it is, or as it should be.
Dantes was idealistic and naïve before being betrayed, he didn't share Quixote's delusions. His hatred gives him power but the central question of that story is the price of hatred; film adaptations make this price very clear but the book is more ambiguous.
Quixote's origin is more extreme than Dates', whose naivete is common in youth. Dantes being betrayed and buried in a hole can be seen as the process of simply growing older and becoming more realistic, having optimism beaten out of him.
I don't lie or obfuscate and everything I say is in good faith. If you disagree with anything I say, discuss it with me, I have always been open to being proven wrong.
I'd specifically like to hear you explain why I'm racist, it's a common rhetorical trick used by the far right to attack progressive ideals. I don't know who or what you are, I have my suspicions due to the nature of your attacks but I keep them to myself.
And what exactly is my true nature?
To be clear, your repeated attacks on my character don't matter. They're nothing more than evidence you aren't interested in discussing the actual issues. I think if you could easily prove me wrong you would, but you choose instead to attack me and dismiss them without consideration.